(09-12-2015 07:16 PM)Niner *** Laude Wrote:  Score should of have been worse with these stats (11 total yards at the half for PC). Looked pretty good for the most part, defense is much improved. Might surprise some people this year...



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

We won't be surprised.

What is the deal with all the high snaps? From what I've read the first game had lots of high snaps and I noticed many in Saturday's game as well. Isn't that something that should be relatively easy to correct?

I guess I was the only dummy to pick Presbyterian to win. I guess that is what I get picking by my denomination....I thought they would be "predestined" to win....

(09-12-2015 07:16 PM)Niner *** Laude Wrote:  Score should of have been worse with these stats (11 total yards at the half for PC). Looked pretty good for the most part, defense is much improved. Might surprise some people this year...



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Damn Niner, this is a family establishment. Your user name was caught by the profanity filter.

edit: Since I brought it up, that spelling always bothered me. It's "come". The other spelling is the equivalent of "Drive-Thru". But what can you expect from the online porn community.

(09-14-2015 11:12 AM)nastybunch Wrote:  I guess I was the only dummy to pick Presbyterian to win. I guess that is what I get picking by my denomination....I thought they would be "predestined" to win....

They looked really bad. They had 9 passing yards the whole game