(06-26-2015 12:48 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  None of what you posted proves that gays will not become any more monogamous after marriage.

Dude I didn't even claim that. Did you not ask me to provide a link for the high STD rates?

(06-26-2015 12:35 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 12:11 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 12:09 PM)Paul M Wrote:  There will be no increase in monogamy.

I love these definitive responses from Paul, all knower. (NOT)

Are you saying that gays needed a change in the law in order to make a personal commitment?

Sounds like we are headed for a sh*tload of gay divorces.

How will the judge determine which one is the man and which is the woman in a divorce case ?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

(06-26-2015 01:08 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 12:35 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 12:11 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 12:09 PM)Paul M Wrote:  There will be no increase in monogamy.

I love these definitive responses from Paul, all knower. (NOT)

Are you saying that gays needed a change in the law in order to make a personal commitment?

Sounds like we are headed for a sh*tload of gay divorces.

How will the judge determine which one is the man and which is the woman in a divorce case ?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Ask who is the pitcher and who is the catcher?

(06-26-2015 01:08 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 12:35 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 12:11 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 12:09 PM)Paul M Wrote:  There will be no increase in monogamy.

I love these definitive responses from Paul, all knower. (NOT)

Are you saying that gays needed a change in the law in order to make a personal commitment?

Sounds like we are headed for a sh*tload of gay divorces.

How will the judge determine which one is the man and which is the woman in a divorce case ?

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

You mean, which one gets screwed over with alimony? I have no idea.

I cant wait for child custody cases, and the stuff that will get aired out during those hearings. Judges just thought they had heard everything.

(06-26-2015 10:34 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Probably. But the real issue is that there are other dynamics at play here. What you'll likely see is a reduction in the increase caused by online hookups, unsafe sex, and drug use running uncontrolled in certain sectors in the community.

This ruling wont change much to stem the 'party' crowd's behavior.

I don't share your confidence. It appears as the the hard fought lessons the homosexual community learned in the 90's regarding sexual best practices have been forgotten or ignored. I'm not sure how or why marriage would change that. You don't need the federal gov't to practice exclusivity.

(06-26-2015 11:46 AM)shere khan Wrote:  It will curb the amount of sex they have and lead to obesity and bitchieness though

Lol, welcome to marriage!

Shifty. Link for proof monogamy wouldn't increase.

Will out of wedlock births decrease?

(06-26-2015 12:48 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  None of what you posted proves that gays will not become any more monogamous after marriage.

You can't prove a future event but based on the lifestyle to date there's plenty of reason to believe it's not likely. Also, it's not like monogamy makes gay sex OK in the first place.

Quit trying to put a negative spin on such a positive achievement.