(05-11-2015 09:21 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:18 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 07:05 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(05-10-2015 02:00 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(05-10-2015 01:59 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  One of those isn't a lie...But that group doesn't claim him.

Lindsey Graham is gay???

Long running rumor, Google it. Not sure of the validity or what Tom thinks he knows, but the rumor has been going on for years.

He's about as straight as Mr. Bachmann.

Hateful vitriol.

Only if you consider being homosexual to be wrong or a negative, which I clearly don't. Might as well consider me calling a tall person out on being tall hateful vitriol.

(05-11-2015 09:26 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:21 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:18 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 07:05 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(05-10-2015 02:00 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Lindsey Graham is gay???

Long running rumor, Google it. Not sure of the validity or what Tom thinks he knows, but the rumor has been going on for years.

He's about as straight as Mr. Bachmann.

Hateful vitriol.

Only if you consider being homosexual to be wrong or a negative, which I clearly don't. Might as well consider me calling a tall person out on being tall hateful vitriol.

Slanderous hateful vitriol*

(05-11-2015 09:27 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:26 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:21 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:18 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 07:05 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Long running rumor, Google it. Not sure of the validity or what Tom thinks he knows, but the rumor has been going on for years.

He's about as straight as Mr. Bachmann.

Hateful vitriol.

Only if you consider being homosexual to be wrong or a negative, which I clearly don't. Might as well consider me calling a tall person out on being tall hateful vitriol.

Slanderous hateful vitriol*

Ugh, slander is spoken, libel is written. Way to make a worthless post somehow worth even less.

(05-11-2015 09:04 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  The economy is a mixed bag right now. Some aspects have improved, some have worsened, some have stagnated.

Getting better but we are much better off than we were 6 years ago.

Carson is going to make things fun. Have you seen his " other groups" interview?

(05-11-2015 09:43 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Carson is going to make things fun. Have you seen his " other groups" interview?

He also thinks we should rethink how SCOTUS rulings affect the executive office.

(05-11-2015 09:32 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:27 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:26 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:21 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:18 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  He's about as straight as Mr. Bachmann.

Hateful vitriol.

Only if you consider being homosexual to be wrong or a negative, which I clearly don't. Might as well consider me calling a tall person out on being tall hateful vitriol.

Slanderous hateful vitriol*

Ugh, slander is spoken, libel is written. Way to make a worthless post somehow worth even less.

Oh, you're going to get all semantic on me now. Keep reaching, kid.

(05-11-2015 09:52 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:32 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:27 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:26 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:21 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  Hateful vitriol.

Only if you consider being homosexual to be wrong or a negative, which I clearly don't. Might as well consider me calling a tall person out on being tall hateful vitriol.

Slanderous hateful vitriol*

Ugh, slander is spoken, libel is written. Way to make a worthless post somehow worth even less.

Oh, you're going to get all semantic on me now. Keep reaching, kid.

You just keep making stupid comments, boy.

(05-11-2015 09:58 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:52 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:32 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:27 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:26 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Only if you consider being homosexual to be wrong or a negative, which I clearly don't. Might as well consider me calling a tall person out on being tall hateful vitriol.

Slanderous hateful vitriol*

Ugh, slander is spoken, libel is written. Way to make a worthless post somehow worth even less.

Oh, you're going to get all semantic on me now. Keep reaching, kid.

You just keep making stupid comments, boy.

If I called Janet Napolitano a bull-dyke, wouldn't that be on the same level of the comments you've made? Or no?

(05-11-2015 10:01 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:58 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:52 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:32 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:27 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  Slanderous hateful vitriol*

Ugh, slander is spoken, libel is written. Way to make a worthless post somehow worth even less.

Oh, you're going to get all semantic on me now. Keep reaching, kid.

You just keep making stupid comments, boy.

If I called Janet Napolitano a bull-dyke, wouldn't that be on the same level of the comments you've made? Or no?

Of course not, because you're not commenting on her sexuality by saying bull-dyke, you're commenting on her masculinity in a pejorative sense. The obvious example would be simply calling her a lesbian, but I'm guessing you knew I'd agree that it'd be the same and instead went for broke. But, like always, you embarrassed yourself and proved yourself to be a terrible spokesperson for your ideology.

You would do better to post less, and admit when you're wrong. Which, in this thread alone, is now twice.

(05-11-2015 10:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 10:01 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:58 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:52 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:32 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Ugh, slander is spoken, libel is written. Way to make a worthless post somehow worth even less.

Oh, you're going to get all semantic on me now. Keep reaching, kid.

You just keep making stupid comments, boy.

If I called Janet Napolitano a bull-dyke, wouldn't that be on the same level of the comments you've made? Or no?

Of course not, because you're not commenting on her sexuality by saying bull-dyke, you're commenting on her masculinity in a pejorative sense. The obvious example would be simply calling her a lesbian, but I'm guessing you knew I'd agree that it'd be the same and instead went for broke. But, like always, you embarrassed yourself and proved yourself to be a terrible spokesperson for your ideology.

You would do better to post less, and admit when you're wrong. Which, in this thread alone, is now twice.

Oh, so we are back to semantics. Wonderful.

Let's see. You seem certain on the fact that a married man is gay. Based on absolutely nothing. I guess you just have super gaydar and are ultra keen on those things. Not libelous.

You perpetuate the double standard that is given to the "sides" of the political spectrum. You also are somewhat desperate with the "Bro, it's libel, not slander!" semantic poo-poo.

And Lindsey Graham too....my goodness....muh gaydar.

(05-11-2015 10:17 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 10:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 10:01 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:58 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:52 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  Oh, you're going to get all semantic on me now. Keep reaching, kid.

You just keep making stupid comments, boy.

If I called Janet Napolitano a bull-dyke, wouldn't that be on the same level of the comments you've made? Or no?

Of course not, because you're not commenting on her sexuality by saying bull-dyke, you're commenting on her masculinity in a pejorative sense. The obvious example would be simply calling her a lesbian, but I'm guessing you knew I'd agree that it'd be the same and instead went for broke. But, like always, you embarrassed yourself and proved yourself to be a terrible spokesperson for your ideology.

You would do better to post less, and admit when you're wrong. Which, in this thread alone, is now twice.

Oh, so we are back to semantics. Wonderful.

Let's see. You seem certain on the fact that a married man is gay. Based on absolutely nothing. I guess you just have super gaydar and are ultra keen on those things. Not libelous.

You perpetuate the double standard that is given to the "sides" of the political spectrum. You also are somewhat desperate with the "Bro, it's libel, not slander!" semantic poo-poo.

Nope, we were never in a semantic argument, I just corrected your incorrect statement. Seems like you're having a problem distinguishing the difference, but that doesn't mean your statement about the bull-dyke just goes by the wayside. You were wrong there, too. Can I get an admission of fault? Or even confusion? Or hell, just a little introspection on your part?

(05-11-2015 02:10 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 10:17 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 10:08 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 10:01 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:58 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  You just keep making stupid comments, boy.

If I called Janet Napolitano a bull-dyke, wouldn't that be on the same level of the comments you've made? Or no?

Of course not, because you're not commenting on her sexuality by saying bull-dyke, you're commenting on her masculinity in a pejorative sense. The obvious example would be simply calling her a lesbian, but I'm guessing you knew I'd agree that it'd be the same and instead went for broke. But, like always, you embarrassed yourself and proved yourself to be a terrible spokesperson for your ideology.

You would do better to post less, and admit when you're wrong. Which, in this thread alone, is now twice.

Oh, so we are back to semantics. Wonderful.

Let's see. You seem certain on the fact that a married man is gay. Based on absolutely nothing. I guess you just have super gaydar and are ultra keen on those things. Not libelous.

You perpetuate the double standard that is given to the "sides" of the political spectrum. You also are somewhat desperate with the "Bro, it's libel, not slander!" semantic poo-poo.

Nope, we were never in a semantic argument, I just corrected your incorrect statement. Seems like you're having a problem distinguishing the difference, but that doesn't mean your statement about the bull-dyke just goes by the wayside. You were wrong there, too. Can I get an admission of fault? Or even confusion? Or hell, just a little introspection on your part?

You cannot get an admission of fault because I made no such statement. What I did, however, was pose a speculative question for you to compare two statements (one of which you said, the other of which I suggested as a hypothetical). You stated that the two statements do not equate. I assume because your gaydar is only operational when attempting to perpetuate libelous nonsense against right-wingers who ruffle your feathers from time to time.

(05-11-2015 07:55 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  

(05-10-2015 01:59 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(05-10-2015 09:27 AM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  Can't wait for Harry "Rooster Cogburn" Reid to start telling lies about these candidates. A couple of possibilities:

Mike Huckabee - "He's Jewish."
Lindsey Graham - "He's gay."
Ben Carson - "He's white."
Ted Cruz - "He's Irish."
Carly Fiorino - "He's transgender."
Rand Paul - "He's a vet."
Marco Rubio - "He really is Andy Guzman."

One of those isn't a lie...But that group doesn't claim him.

I'll swear on a Bible that I put that one in specifically to see if you'd respond.

I don't doubt that for a second. Chuckled out loud when I first read it, actually.

Quote:You cannot get an admission of fault because I made no such statement.

You mean besides this statement?

(05-11-2015 09:27 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:26 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:21 AM)shiftyeagle Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 09:18 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(05-11-2015 07:05 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Long running rumor, Google it. Not sure of the validity or what Tom thinks he knows, but the rumor has been going on for years.

He's about as straight as Mr. Bachmann.

Hateful vitriol.

Only if you consider being homosexual to be wrong or a negative, which I clearly don't. Might as well consider me calling a tall person out on being tall hateful vitriol.

Slanderous hateful vitriol*

I really do wish you had even an ounce of wanting a legitimate discussion here, instead of this sort of nonsense.