I don't understand why the libs on here are marginalizing her for being a comedian... they typically take their marching orders from comedians. (See Jon Stewart, John Oliver, Stephen Colbert, Bill Maher, etc)

(04-17-2015 07:52 AM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 02:44 PM)fsquid Wrote:  she may be a liar, but she is ******* funny

No she isn't. Lowest common denominator humor is all she's got. She's a typical leftist, Hollywood pig.

I agree...I find foul mouthed women unfunny also.

I don't have any problem with women being foul mouthed, I just don't find her very funny.

I'm not sure who this woman is ........



I thought she played on the TV show "Party of Five"?

(04-17-2015 07:56 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I don't understand why the libs on here are marginalizing her for being a comedian... they typically take their marching orders from comedians. (See Jon Stewart, John Oliver, Stephen Colbert, Bill Maher, etc)

What are these "marching orders" you speak of?

(04-16-2015 02:09 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  as are all leftists

Quote:Comedian Sarah Silverman admitted that a story she told about wage discrimination (in which she even went so far as to call out a specific employer by name) was a lie — and then said people who might consider her lie a reason to question the movement she was supporting were “maniacs.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/41...id=1274245

Liar.

(04-17-2015 09:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 07:56 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I don't understand why the libs on here are marginalizing her for being a comedian... they typically take their marching orders from comedians. (See Jon Stewart, John Oliver, Stephen Colbert, Bill Maher, etc)

What are these "marching orders" you speak of?

They tell the incredibly gullible majority of liberals how to think, how to feel about social issues, and how to feel about conservatives. Then, when they lose their credibility, well, they're just comedians, after all.

(04-17-2015 09:22 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 09:03 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 07:56 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  I don't understand why the libs on here are marginalizing her for being a comedian... they typically take their marching orders from comedians. (See Jon Stewart, John Oliver, Stephen Colbert, Bill Maher, etc)

What are these "marching orders" you speak of?

They tell the incredibly gullible majority of liberals how to think, how to feel about social issues, and how to feel about conservatives. Then, when they lose their credibility, well, they're just comedians, after all.

Great point.

And they are quite literally marching orders

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...01573.html

(04-16-2015 03:40 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 03:13 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 03:05 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 02:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 02:09 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  as are all leftists


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/41...id=1274245

News flash

Sarah Silverman is a comedian.

She wasn't telling jokes. Are you saying her credibility is diminished due to her profession? Because that would be an interesting juxtaposition when you published the threat about Chris Rock.

I'm saying that comedians have been known to prank people. Everything they do should be taken with a grain of salt.

This wasn't a prank. She lied, got called out on by the person she lied about, and then apologized.

Have you ever told a lie?

(04-17-2015 09:30 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 03:40 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 03:13 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 03:05 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 02:43 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  News flash

Sarah Silverman is a comedian.

She wasn't telling jokes. Are you saying her credibility is diminished due to her profession? Because that would be an interesting juxtaposition when you published the threat about Chris Rock.

I'm saying that comedians have been known to prank people. Everything they do should be taken with a grain of salt.

This wasn't a prank. She lied, got called out on by the person she lied about, and then apologized.

Have you ever told a lie?

Senor Officer, I am US ceetisen.

Hands Up don't Shoot! That was a lie!

(04-17-2015 09:45 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Hands Up don't Shoot! That was a lie!

Really? Because several eye witnesses said it happened so how is it that YOU know it's a lie?

(04-17-2015 09:46 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 09:45 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Hands Up don't Shoot! That was a lie!

Really? Because several eye witnesses said it happened so how is it that YOU know it's a lie?

Oh, Fit...

(04-17-2015 09:46 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 09:46 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 09:45 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Hands Up don't Shoot! That was a lie!

Really? Because several eye witnesses said it happened so how is it that YOU know it's a lie?

Oh, Fit...

Lots of people testified as to what they saw. No one, save for those people, actually knows what happened.

(04-17-2015 09:48 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 09:46 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 09:46 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 09:45 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Hands Up don't Shoot! That was a lie!

Really? Because several eye witnesses said it happened so how is it that YOU know it's a lie?

Oh, Fit...

Lots of people testified as to what they saw. No one, save for those people, actually knows what happened.

Yet the Department of Justice’s March 4, 2015, investigative report on the shooting of Michael Brown found federal investigators could not confirm witness accounts that Brown signaled surrender before being killed execution-style. The department’s descriptions of about 40 witness testimonies show the original claims that Brown had his hands up were not accurate.

Some witnesses who claimed they saw Brown’s hands raised had testimonies that were inconsistent with physical and forensic evidence. Some admitted to federal investigators they felt pressured to retell the narrative that was being spread after Brown’s shooting. Others recanted their initial testimonies saying they had heard it through media reports or via social media. A few witnesses said Brown had his hands out to his side with his palms up, as if saying “What?” Others said Brown’s hands were not raised, as he was charging at Wilson. A few said Brown’s hands were “balled up.”

Investigators narrowed down the “hands up” claim to a witness – Witness 128 – who had told his family and neighbors his inaccurate version of events as crowds gathered minutes and hours after the shooting, the report says. Another witness could not confirm what she saw because of her poor vision, but she heard a man running around the apartments along the street where Wilson shot Brown. The man was saying something to the effect of, “The police shot my friend and his hands were up.” The witness said that “quickly became the narrative on the street, and to her frustration, people used it both as an excuse to riot and to create a ‘block party’ atmosphere.”

From what you posted

"A few witnesses said Brown had his hands out to his side with his palms up, as if saying “What?”

(04-17-2015 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  From what you posted

"A few witnesses said Brown had his hands out to his side with his palms up, as if saying “What?”

This can also be a "Come at me bro" kind of pose.

(04-17-2015 10:02 AM)TheEagleWay Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  From what you posted

"A few witnesses said Brown had his hands out to his side with his palms up, as if saying “What?”

This can also be a "Come at me bro" kind of pose.

Exactly. That's my point. We don't know what it was.

(04-16-2015 06:26 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Are you saying her singular lie is somehow a counterargument against the issue of wage discrimination in the US?

I'm saying the two are not related at all.

(04-17-2015 10:06 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 10:02 AM)TheEagleWay Wrote:  

(04-17-2015 09:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  From what you posted

"A few witnesses said Brown had his hands out to his side with his palms up, as if saying “What?”

This can also be a "Come at me bro" kind of pose.

Exactly. That's my point. We don't know what it was.

We do....

"Investigators narrowed down the “hands up” claim to a witness – Witness 128 – who had told his family and neighbors his inaccurate version of events as crowds gathered minutes and hours after the shooting, the report says"

They found the guy who made up this claim and spread the lie.