http://newsbusters.org/blogs/pj-gladnick...ed-foreign

An oatmeal cookie! An oatmeal cookie to the first intrepid reporter who asks Hillary Clinton the really important question about her private email server. No, that question isn't about the legality of her use of private email or even her lack of transparency. According to Christopher Budd in his article at GeekWire, the truly important matter here is the security of Hillary's "homebrew" email server.

Budd presents the frighting but very possible spectacle about the likelihood of all of her emails being accessed by foreign intelligence agents: - See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/pj-gladnick...rL3eM.dpuf

(03-10-2015 12:12 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  http://newsbusters.org/blogs/pj-gladnick...ed-foreign
An oatmeal cookie! An oatmeal cookie to the first intrepid reporter who asks Hillary Clinton the really important question about her private email server. No, that question isn't about the legality of her use of private email or even her lack of transparency. According to Christopher Budd in his article at GeekWire, the truly important matter here is the security of Hillary's "homebrew" email server.
Budd presents the frighting but very possible spectacle about the likelihood of all of her emails being accessed by foreign intelligence agents: - See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/pj-gladnick...rL3eM.dpuf

If that happened, then this is not merely criminal, but may also be capital.

A hack was the first thing I thought about when I heard she broke the law and had her
own server.

(03-10-2015 01:43 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  A hack was the first thing I thought about when I heard she broke the law and had her
own server.

Security is the PRIMARY reason NOT to do what she did. Forget all the politics, what she did was STUPID from a national security point of view.

It's all good, folks.

Cankles said most of her deleted emails were between her and her loving husband, and she simply made a mistake.

Just a simple mistake, like Benghazi.

Weird how the same people who don't trust the government and live privacy seem to want someone else's private emails to become public.

Consider this, she said all her e-mail was already archived since it was sent to .Gov addresses. That only applies to Federal Government Employees. E-mail to foreign governments and foreign businesses would only be recorded on her server. I bet the 55,000 pages of e-mails are mostly to US Government Employees. Any e-mail where she solicited foreign money for the Clinton Foundation will likely be erased in case third party inspection is mandated by the courts.

(03-10-2015 08:26 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Weird how the same people who don't trust the government and live privacy seem to want someone else's private emails to become public.

.GOV e-mails are subject to FOI requests, .Clinton are not. When you use employer e-mail it is a legal standard that all content belongs to the employer, she by-passed that too with .Clinton

(03-10-2015 02:23 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(03-10-2015 01:43 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  A hack was the first thing I thought about when I heard she broke the law and had her
own server.

Security is the PRIMARY reason NOT to do what she did. Forget all the politics, what she did was STUPID from a national security point of view.

Well maintaining national security is one side of the argument, but then again she didn't have to walk around with two phones did she?

(03-10-2015 08:45 PM)ODUgradstudent Wrote:  

(03-10-2015 02:23 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(03-10-2015 01:43 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  A hack was the first thing I thought about when I heard she broke the law and had her
own server.

Security is the PRIMARY reason NOT to do what she did. Forget all the politics, what she did was STUPID from a national security point of view.

Well maintaining national security is one side of the argument, but then again she didn't have to walk around with two phones did she?

Not sure I understand the two phone argument. I have both Business and personal e-mails linked on my phone.

(03-10-2015 08:47 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(03-10-2015 08:45 PM)ODUgradstudent Wrote:  

(03-10-2015 02:23 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(03-10-2015 01:43 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  A hack was the first thing I thought about when I heard she broke the law and had her
own server.

Security is the PRIMARY reason NOT to do what she did. Forget all the politics, what she did was STUPID from a national security point of view.

Well maintaining national security is one side of the argument, but then again she didn't have to walk around with two phones did she?

Not sure I understand the two phone argument. I have both Business and personal e-mails linked on my phone.

With nous like that you could be Hillary's technical advisor!



In all seriousness to explain the comment, one of her excuses was that she would have needed two phones for her to use an official email account as well as her own.

gizmodo Wrote:In a press conference at the United Nations, Hillary Clinton just admitted that the initial reasoning behind her using a personal email account for official business as secretary of state was simple: She didn't want to carry around two phones. "I thought it would be easier to carry one device for my work," she said.

http://gizmodo.com/hillary-clinton-i-use...1690599305

Sometimes I text message my Co workers through private accounts. Just because she emailed feds through her private account doesn't mean it was some kind of conspiracy. They could have been come recipes.

(03-10-2015 08:26 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Weird how the same people who don't trust the government and live privacy seem to want someone else's private emails to become public.

They are not PRIVATE. Why is that so hard to understand?

(03-10-2015 08:26 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Weird how the same people who don't trust the government and live privacy seem to want someone else's private emails to become public.

This is not government inquiring about citizens' private emails. This is citizens inquiring about government's emails.

She was just being transparent.

(03-10-2015 08:26 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Weird how the same people who don't trust the government and live privacy seem to want someone else's private emails to become public.

Seriously bruh? Are you being willfully ignorant or intellectually dishonest?

PANTSUITS!!