(02-16-2015 07:06 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(02-16-2015 07:02 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  He need to go back to school.

I agree. If he's only a semester short, get it done. That's how long? 3 months? 4 months?

Why? Seems like a waste of time at this point.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

(02-16-2015 08:21 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(02-16-2015 07:06 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(02-16-2015 07:02 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  He need to go back to school.

I agree. If he's only a semester short, get it done. That's how long? 3 months? 4 months?

Why? Seems like a waste of time at this point.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Exactly. It's not like someone like Fit or Mach are going to suddenly Change their mind if Walker crams some online classes in to get his degree. Or the NYT will suddenly say 'He finished his degree...he's our guy!'
Additionally, there are a 'statute of limitations' on credits. After a certain number of years you will have to repeat classes if you wish to continue/ complete your degree

(02-16-2015 08:30 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(02-16-2015 08:21 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(02-16-2015 07:06 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  

(02-16-2015 07:02 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  He need to go back to school.

I agree. If he's only a semester short, get it done. That's how long? 3 months? 4 months?

Why? Seems like a waste of time at this point.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Exactly. It's not like someone like Fit or Mach are going to suddenly Change their mind if Walker crams some online classes in to get his degree. Or the NYT will suddenly say 'He finished his degree...he's our guy!'
Additionally, there are a 'statute of limitations' on credits. After a certain number of years you will have to repeat classes if you wish to continue/ complete your degree

My uncle dropped out one semester short of graduating. He unexpectedly had a family to take care of and he did what he had to do.

To be that close and not finish would drive me crazy. That's like climbing Mount Everest and getting within a hundred feet of the summit, then turning back saying, "Well, that's close enough guys. We've seen the top".

He's disqualified.

I can't imagine getting that close and quitting. Not finishing what you started. My wrestling coach taught me better I guess. Did the weasel even play sports?

But the guy sure can steal from public pension plans! Yee Haw!!!!!!!!! He screwed over teachers! That makes the man qualified to the mouth breathers.

(02-16-2015 09:14 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  But the guy sure can steal from public pension plans! Yee Haw!!!!!!!!! He screwed over teachers! That makes the man qualified to the mouth breathers.

Wow! Such anger and hyperbole, I thought you wanted I higher level decorum on this board... calm down and take a deep breath it's not like he passed a law that forced the people of Wisconsin to buy a product or be taxed for failing to do so.

They only want us to pipe down NC Herd. They still want to spew whatever **** they feel like.

(02-16-2015 09:32 PM)Paul M Wrote:  They only want us to pipe down NC Herd. They still want to spew whatever **** they feel like.

Ah, sort of like Obama after the 2008 election, there's a place on the bus for everyone but the Republicans need to sit in back.

Let someone steal from you and see how well you like them. He's an a**.

(02-16-2015 09:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Let someone steal from you and see how well you like them. He's an a**.

Cough/Cough Obamacare.....

At least he's not exempting certain people from his decisions or deferring it for a future date.

(02-16-2015 09:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Let someone steal from you and see how well you like them. He's an a**.

He was just stealing back for the taxpayers what the leftist unions had stolen from them.

(02-16-2015 09:39 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(02-16-2015 09:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Let someone steal from you and see how well you like them. He's an a**.

He was just stealing back for the taxpayers what the leftist unions had stolen from them.

Defined benefit pensions are designed to fail, but labor unions love them. Only gubment employees still have these as a primary retirement benefit.

Only the right can have no problem with the 1% and their corrupting influence on our government and point to public pensions as too generous! You guys are truly amazing.

Anybody who uses the term 1% in a context like this doesn't know what they are talking about.

(02-16-2015 09:56 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Anybody who uses the term 1% in a context like this doesn't know what they are talking about.

Nothing new with Mach.

And most of the 1%ers are on the left.

Yep, nothing at all to do with Citizens United and busting up Unions. These things were never discussed at the Koch Brothers retreats. Not related at all. Nothing to see here.

Deep pockets and huge groups on the left... good. Same for the right... bad.

The majority of the 1% make between 500-1,000,000 per year and work 90 hours per week. They are more like the working stiff who makes $7.25 per hour than the person the title 1% is actually trying to refer too.

It's a term for total F-ing morons and hearing every two second by yet another shlub throwing it around pisses me off.

BTW, I'm not calling Mach a shlub. I'm talking about the dumbasses who pedal this **** on tv and throughout the political discourse.