niubrad00
Boss
Posts: 8,048
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: -13
I Root For: NIU
Location:
|
RE: Net neutrality wins: the FCC will propose strong Title II regulation
(03-12-2015 10:45 PM)niuguy Wrote: (03-12-2015 09:05 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote: (03-12-2015 07:41 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: (03-12-2015 07:14 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote: (03-12-2015 07:02 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: Competition goes way down and service goes way down, not a good scenario
Explain please.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/...mpetition/
Its just like universal health care and the liberal idea of driving down competition. In this case, favoring the dominant ISPs and getting rid of the smaller ones will only drive prices up as the competition goes down. The government is just overreaching far too much the past decade, it really has turned into a communist/socialist state.
Previous to this ruling, with the "open market" we have reached what we have today. How do you figure the previous status quo would have changed anything?
I'm specifically interested in his economic theory as to why these rules will hurt smaller ISPs in favor of large ones. Like, specifics. Play it out hypothetically and describe why.
Because that's what Rush told him. So it must be right.
|
|
03-13-2015 06:49 AM |
|
MaddDawgz02
Banned
Posts: 40,735
Joined: Jan 2004
I Root For: any UT opponent
Location:
|
RE: Net neutrality wins: the FCC will propose strong Title II regulation
(03-13-2015 06:49 AM)niubrad00 Wrote: (03-12-2015 10:45 PM)niuguy Wrote: (03-12-2015 09:05 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote: (03-12-2015 07:41 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: (03-12-2015 07:14 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote: Explain please.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/...mpetition/
Its just like universal health care and the liberal idea of driving down competition. In this case, favoring the dominant ISPs and getting rid of the smaller ones will only drive prices up as the competition goes down. The government is just overreaching far too much the past decade, it really has turned into a communist/socialist state.
Previous to this ruling, with the "open market" we have reached what we have today. How do you figure the previous status quo would have changed anything?
I'm specifically interested in his economic theory as to why these rules will hurt smaller ISPs in favor of large ones. Like, specifics. Play it out hypothetically and describe why.
Because that's what Rush told him. So it must be right.
I don't listen to Rush at all, but I know its shocking that someone can have a view that NBC/CNN/MSNBC/AP didn't tell you to have, but alternative views exist.
|
|
03-17-2015 05:06 PM |
|
niuguy
The first in, last out!
Posts: 7,212
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 52
I Root For: NIU Huskies
Location: Chicago, IL
|
RE: Net neutrality wins: the FCC will propose strong Title II regulation
(03-17-2015 05:06 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: (03-13-2015 06:49 AM)niubrad00 Wrote: (03-12-2015 10:45 PM)niuguy Wrote: (03-12-2015 09:05 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote: (03-12-2015 07:41 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/...mpetition/
Its just like universal health care and the liberal idea of driving down competition. In this case, favoring the dominant ISPs and getting rid of the smaller ones will only drive prices up as the competition goes down. The government is just overreaching far too much the past decade, it really has turned into a communist/socialist state.
Previous to this ruling, with the "open market" we have reached what we have today. How do you figure the previous status quo would have changed anything?
I'm specifically interested in his economic theory as to why these rules will hurt smaller ISPs in favor of large ones. Like, specifics. Play it out hypothetically and describe why.
Because that's what Rush told him. So it must be right.
I don't listen to Rush at all, but I know its shocking that someone can have a view that NBC/CNN/MSNBC/AP didn't tell you to have, but alternative views exist.
You know, once you start including the Associated Press into your "left wing media bias" group you know you have no grasp on reality and should be rethinking your news sources. You want to include Reuters in there too?
Maybe eventually you'll get to the point that the only source for information you trust the the blog some dude runs out of his basement.
|
|
03-18-2015 08:43 AM |
|
BobL
Heisman
Posts: 7,578
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 41
I Root For: NIU
Location:
|
RE: Net neutrality wins: the FCC will propose strong Title II regulation
(03-18-2015 08:43 AM)niuguy Wrote: (03-17-2015 05:06 PM)MaddDawgz02 Wrote: (03-13-2015 06:49 AM)niubrad00 Wrote: (03-12-2015 10:45 PM)niuguy Wrote: (03-12-2015 09:05 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote: Previous to this ruling, with the "open market" we have reached what we have today. How do you figure the previous status quo would have changed anything?
I'm specifically interested in his economic theory as to why these rules will hurt smaller ISPs in favor of large ones. Like, specifics. Play it out hypothetically and describe why.
Because that's what Rush told him. So it must be right.
I don't listen to Rush at all, but I know its shocking that someone can have a view that NBC/CNN/MSNBC/AP didn't tell you to have, but alternative views exist.
You know, once you start including the Associated Press into your "left wing media bias" group you know you have no grasp on reality and should be rethinking your news sources. You want to include Reuters in there too?
Maybe eventually you'll get to the point that the only source for information you trust the the blog some dude runs out of his basement.
MD is clueless.
|
|
03-18-2015 12:28 PM |
|