A good read for the liberals.

Quote:Here’s what happened the last time Hillary Clinton ran for president: she drove men wild. Well, certain men. Especially certain men on the right. You could recognize them by the flecks of foam in the corners of their mouths when the subject of her candidacy arose. And they’re already girding themselves for the next time around, because there’s something about Hillary that just gets them all worked up.

But what exactly? Despise her they do, yet they’re also strangely drawn to her, in some inexplicably intimate way. She occupies their attention. They spend a lot of time thinking about her—enumerating her character flaws, dissecting her motives, analyzing her physical shortcomings with a penetrating, clinical eye: those thick ankles and dumpy hips, the ever-changing hairdos. You’d think they were talking about their first wives.

A Deformed Woman: Hillary Clinton and the Men Who Hate Her

That definitely seems like a great article from a reliable newsource that isn't mean to generalize or inflame. This should lead to another fantastic and quality discussion on these boards.

Nothing like pre-setting the stage that disliking Senator Clinton as a Presidential candidate is sexist.

Typical Lord Stanley: "I do not support Hillary Clinton for President for a variety of reasons that include her lack of accomplishments, her rather tawdry political history, and because I do not like political dynasties."

Typical Liberal: “You’re a racist and hate women”.
Typical Liberal: "Koch brothers!"
Typical Liberal: “Faux News! Faux News! Faux News!”

The Liberals are going to ride this playbook.

Why can't the Liberals find a better female canidate than this nutt job!

Anything ....... Anyone

Please

(12-05-2014 12:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  A good read for the liberals.

meh, there's better fantasy lit out there

http://www.castaliahouse.com/vox-fantasy/

(12-05-2014 12:45 PM)NewJersey GATA Wrote:  Why can't the Liberals find a better female canidate than this nutt job!

Anything ....... Anyone

Please

Don't know if there is a better female candidate for the dems.

Personally, I'd rather see Warren, but she's probably less electable than Hillary.

If we're just talking about better choices, I'd rather see Bernie Sanders in the White House than either of them.

Poor Hillary. So broke. So poor.

(12-05-2014 01:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2014 12:45 PM)NewJersey GATA Wrote:  Why can't the Liberals find a better female canidate than this nutt job!

Anything ....... Anyone

Please

Don't know if there is a better female candidate for the dems.

Personally, I'd rather see Warren, but she's probably less electable than Hillary.

If we're just talking about better choices, I'd rather see Bernie Sanders in the White House than either of them.

Why is the goal to get a female candidate? Why not just get the best DNC member out there?

(12-05-2014 03:08 PM)vandiver49 Wrote:  

(12-05-2014 01:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2014 12:45 PM)NewJersey GATA Wrote:  Why can't the Liberals find a better female canidate [sic] than this nutt job!

Anything ....... Anyone

Please

Don't know if there is a better female candidate for the dems.

Personally, I'd rather see Warren, but she's probably less electable than Hillary.

If we're just talking about better choices, I'd rather see Bernie Sanders in the White House than either of them.

Why is the goal to get a female candidate? Why not just get the best DNC member out there?

It's not. He asked about another female candidate.

I don't think there is any chance it's not Hillary though.

[quote='Redwingtom' pid='11497787' dateline='1417799683']
A good read for the liberals.

Quote:they’re also strangely drawn to her, in some inexplicably intimate way. She occupies their attention.

LULZ.. She's a flake, I didn't even think she was still considering a run...

Well her hubby didn't think she was good enough to be a humidor.

(12-05-2014 03:37 PM)bevotex Wrote:  Well her hubby didn't think she was good enough to be a humidor.

No, but Huma Abedin always thought her tongue made nice work. Maybe it was her mannish looks, all liberal women have it.

(12-05-2014 01:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-05-2014 12:45 PM)NewJersey GATA Wrote:  Why can't the Liberals find a better female canidate than this nutt job!

Anything ....... Anyone

Please

Don't know if there is a better female candidate for the dems.

Personally, I'd rather see Warren, but she's probably less electable than Hillary.

If we're just talking about better choices, I'd rather see Bernie Sanders in the White House than either of them.

So you are a socialist? I'm shocked

She just seems creepy to me. So power-hungry, so conniving, so phony.

And that Rules For Radicals connection with Saul Alinsky. Very scary.

The more one listens to Hillary speak, the more you dislike her. Like Obama, she has accomplished NOTHING in her political career.

I certainly do not trust her, Obama, or any other leading lib to effectively deal with that 2am call, ref. Benghazi.

Name one accomplishment she can hang her pantsuits on. Just one.

(12-05-2014 11:11 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  The more one listens to Hillary speak, the more you dislike her. Like Obama, she has accomplished NOTHING in her political career.

I certainly do not trust her, Obama, or any other leading lib to effectively deal with that 2am call, ref. Benghazi.

Name one accomplishment she can hang her pantsuits on. Just one.

Hell, she couldn't even name one.

Can't wait until these racists become sexists.

(12-05-2014 12:28 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  The Liberals are going to ride this playbook.

The visual of Hillary and being ridden is now in my head. Do that again and I'll have give you -2 reputation vote!