Offense getting a lot of good looks, but not finishing on all of them. D more porous than a typical Cullop D, but not that surprising with all the freshmen on the floor.

CSU starting to rain 3s, and takes a 31-24 lead ... TO UT.

3s...not making them ourselves and giving up quite a few...seemed to be an ongoing problem for us last season. Will be interested to see his that pans out this season.

Rockets trail 34-25 at the 4 minute TO. Harriot to the line for 1 and 1 when play resumes.

Defense is spotty. We can't make free throws and nobody seems like a scorer...hence we're losing to a team we should beat

The positive: I like the talent we have

Hopefully we correct some of the mistakes at halftime. We should beat this team...

Rockets down 41-31 at the half.

D has been poor. Gave up probably 10 wide open 3s and CSU made most of them.

O looked good, got a lot of really good looks, including several layups in the half-court offense. Didn't make enough shots though. And free throw shooting terrible again.

Reecher has improved a lot on the offensive end. She made 2 beautiful passes, in addition to getting to the rim down low. She's getting exposed on D though, as her players are pulling her outside and she's having difficulty keeping up with the quicker players.

Inma largely missing on O, only 2 points and a few shots.

Rassmussen looks very good for a freshman in her first college game.

Inma missing in action. She's a senior and needs to be averaging 20 points per game.

(11-14-2014 07:54 PM)DetroitRocket Wrote:  Inma missing in action. She's a senior and needs to be averaging 20 points per game.

She's not a scorer which would be ok if Harriot, Rasmussen, and Capotosto average double figures a night...a lot to ask for

If Inma can be a force on defense and rebounding while contributing a few points...I'll call that a successful senior season

A little bit of an ass chewing during this TO by Cullop...

50-38 CSU, TO UT.

* sigh *

(11-14-2014 08:01 PM)Rocket_Fanatic Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 07:54 PM)DetroitRocket Wrote:  Inma missing in action. She's a senior and needs to be averaging 20 points per game.

She's not a scorer which would be ok if Harriot, Rasmussen, and Capotosto average double figures a night...a lot to ask for

If Inma can be a force on defense and rebounding while contributing a few points...I'll call that a successful senior season

Inma is a scorer and should be averaging 13-14 points per game.

(11-14-2014 08:18 PM)northrocket43 Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 08:01 PM)Rocket_Fanatic Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 07:54 PM)DetroitRocket Wrote:  Inma missing in action. She's a senior and needs to be averaging 20 points per game.

She's not a scorer which would be ok if Harriot, Rasmussen, and Capotosto average double figures a night...a lot to ask for

If Inma can be a force on defense and rebounding while contributing a few points...I'll call that a successful senior season

Inma is a scorer and should be averaging 13-14 points per game.

I'll give you that but her game doesn't fit the scorer mentality...

56-42. 8 min left...pretty much ball game

(11-14-2014 08:21 PM)Rocket_Fanatic Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 08:18 PM)northrocket43 Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 08:01 PM)Rocket_Fanatic Wrote:  

(11-14-2014 07:54 PM)DetroitRocket Wrote:  Inma missing in action. She's a senior and needs to be averaging 20 points per game.

She's not a scorer which would be ok if Harriot, Rasmussen, and Capotosto average double figures a night...a lot to ask for

If Inma can be a force on defense and rebounding while contributing a few points...I'll call that a successful senior season

She is preseason first team MAC. Won't do that without scoring around 15 points/game. She has the shots to do that, just does not have a reliable 3 point shot.

Inma is a scorer and should be averaging 13-14 points per game.

I'll give you that but her game doesn't fit the scorer mentality...

Reecher is kind of a liability on defensive end because of her "lack of quickness"