(09-26-2014 02:56 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  The Bush name is too toxic. Besides he's already screwed the pooch on immigration.

Agreed.

(09-26-2014 08:24 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(09-26-2014 02:56 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  The Bush name is too toxic. Besides he's already screwed the pooch on immigration.

Agreed.

Obama has a better chance of getting elected for a 3rd term, than another Bush has getting put in the white house.

Jeb Bush has decided to run in 2016




SHUT YO' MOUF! No please.

He's your best shot. He really is.

(09-26-2014 07:04 PM)Brokeback Flamer Wrote:  

(09-26-2014 03:17 PM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(09-26-2014 03:13 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  Jeb is cool with amnesty...
Mitt has Romney Care...
Christie walks arm in arm with Obama...

Interesting options, lol

I never had an issue with RomneyCare. That was a state initiative and state's have the right and duty to implement what they feel is best for their state. There's no comparison between RomneyCare and ObamaCare. ObamaCare was a federal initiative that because of a technical play was deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court. I still say that it was unconstitutional.

RomneyCare did not sink Romney's run. Team Obama did an outstanding job painting possibly the nicest yet most qualified person to ever run for President as pure walking Evil.

Agree with this wholeheartedly.

(09-26-2014 09:09 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  He's your best shot. He really is.

Not quite convinced of that, but I'm inclined to agree.

(09-26-2014 08:46 PM)ETSUfan1 Wrote:  

(09-26-2014 08:24 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(09-26-2014 02:56 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  The Bush name is too toxic. Besides he's already screwed the pooch on immigration.

Agreed.

Obama has a better chance of getting elected for a 3rd term, than another Bush has getting put in the white house.

That is exactly how the GOP should run their campaign, they should run it like they're campaigning against Obama just like the way Obama ran against Bush in 2008. Anyone but Obama.

(09-26-2014 03:13 PM)BeliefBlazer Wrote:  Bush v Clinton. Ugh.

wait....what year is it???

Honestly, if he does run I bet neither get the nomination. He's got to be rusty since he hasn't served since 2006.

(09-26-2014 10:28 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-26-2014 03:13 PM)BeliefBlazer Wrote:  Bush v Clinton. Ugh.

wait....what year is it???

The only potential up-side is that a Bush/Clinton race would provide a major opening for the Libertarian and other third-party nominees. If those nominees were able to capitalize on the opportunity, then that could be a healthy and positive development in American politics.

But even with that, the idea of the Bush/Clinton dynasty being extended for another decade is horribly depressing.

Funny thing with Bush, Paul, Romney and Clinton is They All currently Now More Qualified to be president than the Bumbling Idiot currently in there. . Even after 6 Years, He's accomplished Nothing but Failures.

(09-26-2014 10:44 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(09-26-2014 10:28 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-26-2014 03:13 PM)BeliefBlazer Wrote:  Bush v Clinton. Ugh.

wait....what year is it???

The only potential up-side is that a Bush/Clinton race would provide a major opening for the Libertarian and other third-party nominees. If those nominees were able to capitalize on the opportunity, then that could be a healthy and positive development in American politics.

But even with that, the idea of the Bush/Clinton dynasty being extended for another decade is horribly depressing.

can you imagine 300 years from now some kid trying to name the presidents in order if both hil & jeb somehow manage to win future presidencies:

bush, clinton, bush, obama, clinton, bush

a long shot I know, but that would be pretty hilarious.

The joke is on all of us if anyone named Bush or Clinton win in 2016.

I'll take Romney. His presidency would run laps around that of the fool we have now.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(09-27-2014 01:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I'll take Romney. His presidency would run laps around that of the fool we have now.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Let's put this in a scenario that we understand. Remember the k-state/auburn game? How k-state regardless of score and how much better they were than auburn still lost? Well, that's how the presidential race pitting Romney and obama went. Romney is K-state and obama despite being inferior won. The referees were the media.

(09-27-2014 01:05 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(09-27-2014 01:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I'll take Romney. His presidency would run laps around that of the fool we have now.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Let's put this in a scenario that we understand. Remember the k-state/auburn game? How k-state regardless of score and how much better they were than auburn still lost? Well, that's how the presidential race pitting Romney and obama went. Romney is K-state and obama despite being inferior won. The referees were the media.

Candy Crowley bailed out Obama's ass by intervening with a lie at a crucial moment.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(09-27-2014 01:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I'll take Romney. His presidency would run laps around that of the fool we have now.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Stop it. Nobody likes Romney.

(09-27-2014 01:36 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(09-27-2014 01:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I'll take Romney. His presidency would run laps around that of the fool we have now.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Stop it. Nobody likes Romney.

He's not my idea of an perfect candidate, but he's infinitely better than the clown we have now. Obama sucks. He's a moron.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(09-27-2014 01:36 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(09-27-2014 01:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  I'll take Romney. His presidency would run laps around that of the fool we have now.


Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

Stop it. Nobody likes Romney.

I do.

Go Jeb go. Lol

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App