http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio.../16082847/

http://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/new.../16073451/

Waits for LSU to post angry things...

Anyone see what I did there with our dancing banana carrots? :}

(09-23-2014 12:31 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  Anyone see what I did there with our dancing banana carrots? :}

prepare for angry rants from those smelling of corn dogs...

HIP HIP HOORAY!!!!


Now why, if yall are talking about it, would I come in here with angry comments about it? I heard about it yesterday and the first thought that crossed my mind was "Go figure" and the second was UofMemphis desiring to move to La to get married.

To his boyfriend of course.

(09-23-2014 11:59 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Waits for LSU to post angry things...

BASTARD QUEERS! STOOPID NASTY SATANIC HELL BOUND SONS A BIITCHES!

Better?

LSU is very angry right now....It's obvious he's trying to downplay it, but the rapid fire posts in 3 minutes proves it imho.

Guess most ultra cons get riled up by news like this, so it's not really that big of a deal.

It makes you wonder how the democrats were able to find all these judges and what incentives were given to them.

It's no coincidence that this all began under the Obama admin.

(09-23-2014 02:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It makes you wonder how the democrats were able to find all these judges and what incentives were given to them.

It's no coincidence that this all began under the Obama admin.

I thought you were a big "states rights" guy?

(09-23-2014 02:25 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It makes you wonder how the democrats were able to find all these judges and what incentives were given to them.

It's no coincidence that this all began under the Obama admin.

I thought you were a big "states rights" guy?

I thought you were under the impression you were a conservative.

This has nothing to do with states rights. A Federal court will ultimately strike
down the ban. The fix is already in.

(09-23-2014 02:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:25 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It makes you wonder how the democrats were able to find all these judges and what incentives were given to them.

It's no coincidence that this all began under the Obama admin.

I thought you were a big "states rights" guy?

I thought you were under the impression you were a conservative.

This has nothing to do with states rights. A Federal court will ultimately strike
down the ban. The fix is already in.

I am a small government conservative and a social conservative. Just because I think something, doesn't mean I am going to force my views on other with the strong arm of the state.

(09-23-2014 02:19 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 11:59 AM)john01992 Wrote:  Waits for LSU to post angry things...

BASTARD QUEERS! STOOPID NASTY SATANIC HELL BOUND SONS A BIITCHES!

Better?

I was excepting something a little bit angrier

(09-23-2014 02:31 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:25 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It makes you wonder how the democrats were able to find all these judges and what incentives were given to them.

It's no coincidence that this all began under the Obama admin.

I thought you were a big "states rights" guy?

I thought you were under the impression you were a conservative.

This has nothing to do with states rights. A Federal court will ultimately strike
down the ban. The fix is already in.

I am a small government conservative and a social conservative. Just because I think something, doesn't mean I am going to force my views on other with the strong arm of the state.

You mean like the LGBT community is doing with these types of decisions?

(09-23-2014 02:31 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:25 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It makes you wonder how the democrats were able to find all these judges and what incentives were given to them.

It's no coincidence that this all began under the Obama admin.

I thought you were a big "states rights" guy?

I thought you were under the impression you were a conservative.

This has nothing to do with states rights. A Federal court will ultimately strike
down the ban. The fix is already in.

I am a small government conservative and a social conservative. Just because I think something, doesn't mean I am going to force my views on other with the strong arm of the state.

You are a libertarian. A social conservative pushes for the preservation of the traditional family.

Again, this is not about state's rights.

(09-23-2014 02:25 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It makes you wonder how the democrats were able to find all these judges and what incentives were given to them.

It's no coincidence that this all began under the Obama admin.

I thought you were a big "states rights" guy?

yeah but only on issues that dixie approves of.

#dixie logic

(09-23-2014 02:34 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:31 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:25 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It makes you wonder how the democrats were able to find all these judges and what incentives were given to them.

It's no coincidence that this all began under the Obama admin.

I thought you were a big "states rights" guy?

I thought you were under the impression you were a conservative.

This has nothing to do with states rights. A Federal court will ultimately strike
down the ban. The fix is already in.

I am a small government conservative and a social conservative. Just because I think something, doesn't mean I am going to force my views on other with the strong arm of the state.

You mean like the LGBT community is doing with these types of decisions?

You're confusing the federal courts with the LGBT community....

(09-23-2014 02:35 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:31 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:25 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It makes you wonder how the democrats were able to find all these judges and what incentives were given to them.

It's no coincidence that this all began under the Obama admin.

I thought you were a big "states rights" guy?

I thought you were under the impression you were a conservative.

This has nothing to do with states rights. A Federal court will ultimately strike
down the ban. The fix is already in.

I am a small government conservative and a social conservative. Just because I think something, doesn't mean I am going to force my views on other with the strong arm of the state.

You are a libertarian. A social conservative pushes for the preservation of the traditional family.

Again, this is not about state's rights.

Through the force of big government, which conservatives should be universally opposed to. You have no problem using big government to force your views upon others, which is the exact opposite of conservatism, it is authoritarianism. Please refer to yourself as such from now on.

(09-23-2014 02:36 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:34 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:31 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:25 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  I thought you were a big "states rights" guy?

I thought you were under the impression you were a conservative.

This has nothing to do with states rights. A Federal court will ultimately strike
down the ban. The fix is already in.

I am a small government conservative and a social conservative. Just because I think something, doesn't mean I am going to force my views on other with the strong arm of the state.

You mean like the LGBT community is doing with these types of decisions?

You're confusing the federal courts with the LGBT community....

Hmmm you might be on to something the federal courts full of LGBT'ers. Nah thats fodder for another time. I'm not confusing anything.

(09-23-2014 02:34 PM)bevotex Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:31 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:25 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(09-23-2014 02:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  It makes you wonder how the democrats were able to find all these judges and what incentives were given to them.

It's no coincidence that this all began under the Obama admin.

I thought you were a big "states rights" guy?

I thought you were under the impression you were a conservative.

This has nothing to do with states rights. A Federal court will ultimately strike
down the ban. The fix is already in.

I am a small government conservative and a social conservative. Just because I think something, doesn't mean I am going to force my views on other with the strong arm of the state.

You mean like the LGBT community is doing with these types of decisions?

It must be so tough for you that you have to marry another dude, wait that isn't actually what is happening here, so nothing is being forced on you.