(07-18-2014 01:26 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  All of our children are being "groomed" at the same time. Their attitudes about homosexuality are being changed by one-sided, pro-"gay" propaganda in public education, in television programming, in movies, in music, in advertising, and in every other attitude-shaping institution influenced by "gay" activists. Understanding this simple truth greatly increases our chances of protecting our children from homosexuality. Recruitment begins in the mind and in the emotions; it begins when a person is persuaded to consider trying homosexual behavior. Not every young person who concludes that "gay" is normal will experiment with homosexuality. Neither will every child who experiments become exclusively "gay." Yet we know that all children explore life's possibilities. When homosexuality is presented as a normal option (instead of being discouraged), many will experiment with it who otherwise wouldn't. Some of those will choose to stay in the "gay" lifestyle, or remain trapped there by this strongly addictive sexual behavior.

Sexual orientation theory is the ultimate recruitment tool of the "gay" movement. Since the supposed orientation is only discovered through self-awareness, anything that can influence self-awareness can influence orientation. Self-awareness is largely a process of searching and experiencing our emotions. Now, nothing is more easily manipulated in human beings than the emotions, and the most emotionally malleable human beings of all are children. Remember that sexual orientation theory doesn't define homosexuality by whether one engages in homosexual acts, but by whether one has homosexual feelings toward someone of the same gender. The average child with strong feelings of love or affection towards a same-sex friend or adult role model is vulnerable (especially during adolescence) to mistaking those normal and healthy feelings for an innate homosexual "orientation."

You hit the nail on the head... All a child needs is one person to look up to and they will follow those footsteps through their childhood, youth, and usually their adulthood. That's where millennials come in. This indoctrination started to go full retard with them and they've eaten it up. While there are many that have the common sense to say no, there are many more that don't understand the future problems that will ensue.

Maybe Tom could donate his sperm slide collection

(07-18-2014 01:41 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  Maybe Tom could donate his sperm slide collection

If he thinks it will help indoctrinate 12 year olds, he probably already has.

(07-18-2014 12:41 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  We should have stopped at segregation when we were all equal.

Are you really saying that separate but equal was a good thing? Or are you just saying that as soon as officially sanctioned segregation ended everything was hunky-dory?

(07-18-2014 01:49 PM)jh Wrote:  

(07-18-2014 12:41 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  We should have stopped at segregation when we were all equal.

Are you really saying that separate but equal was a good thing? Or are you just saying that as soon as officially sanctioned segregation ended everything was hunky-dory?

As soon as blacks and whites were equal.

(07-18-2014 02:46 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-18-2014 01:49 PM)jh Wrote:  

(07-18-2014 12:41 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  We should have stopped at segregation when we were all equal.

Are you really saying that separate but equal was a good thing? Or are you just saying that as soon as officially sanctioned segregation ended everything was hunky-dory?

As soon as blacks and whites were equal.

Which was when?

Nice move, jh. You've got him off the subject of his jizz wipes.

(07-18-2014 01:26 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  All of our children are being "groomed" at the same time. Their attitudes about homosexuality are being changed by one-sided, pro-"gay" propaganda in public education, in television programming, in movies, in music, in advertising, and in every other attitude-shaping institution influenced by "gay" activists.

Not mine. We homeschool and don't spend much time watching movies and TV, and just don't give opportunity for those influences into our home. (i.e., House Hunters certainly has an agenda in who's on the show, but we just delete episodes that don't appeal to us.)

(07-18-2014 03:13 PM)jh Wrote:  

(07-18-2014 02:46 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-18-2014 01:49 PM)jh Wrote:  

(07-18-2014 12:41 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  We should have stopped at segregation when we were all equal.

Are you really saying that separate but equal was a good thing? Or are you just saying that as soon as officially sanctioned segregation ended everything was hunky-dory?

As soon as blacks and whites were equal.

Which was when?

Late 20th century. I'm all for equality as long as we're talking about the true definition of the word.

(07-18-2014 03:14 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Nice move, jh. You've got him off the subject of his jizz wipes.

I only said it once, you're the one who commented on it.

(07-18-2014 03:52 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-18-2014 03:14 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Nice move, jh. You've got him off the subject of his jizz wipes.

I only said it once, you're the one who commented on it.

Which was too many, and you replied, when you doubled down, so twice.

(07-18-2014 04:00 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(07-18-2014 03:52 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-18-2014 03:14 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Nice move, jh. You've got him off the subject of his jizz wipes.

I only said it once, you're the one who commented on it.

Which was too many, and you replied, when you doubled down, so twice.

I apologize that your virgin imagination had to read the horrid description of a nut rag.

At least I'm not asking for children and young teens to bring them to school for a project.