Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Maize · 06-27-2014 03:03 PM

From the article:

Before the trial started, the plaintiffs filed a proposed injunction of what an O'Bannon win could mean if Wilken ruled in their favor. The new proposed injunction has 11 options. They include preventing the NCAA from the following:

* Defining pay as including compensation for the use of players' NILs.

* Awarding four-year scholarships in exchange for players' NIL rights.

* Banning third-party endorsement pay to players for use of their NILs, subject to approval by a school (the Olympic model)

* Including NIL payments when awarding school and education-related expenses.

* Including NIL compensation when awarding a scholarship that reaches the full cost of attendance.

* Banning deferred compensation for players' NILs through a trust fund based upon eligibility or graduation, whichever comes first.

* Awarding medical insurance and related medical expenses in exchange or partial exchange for the use of players' NILs.

* Banning schools and conferences from providing travel and complimentary expenses for players' friends and families in exchange for players' NIL rights.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...ncaa-trial

stever20 · 06-27-2014 03:12 PM

actually what you posted is what the NCAA would be prevented from doing.

Maize · 06-27-2014 03:21 PM

(06-27-2014 03:12 PM)stever20 Wrote: actually what you posted is what the NCAA would be prevented from doing.

Fixed....Thanks... 04-cheers

Threaded Mode \| Linear Mode CBS: O'Bannon plaintiffs offer new options if they win NCAA trial
Author	Message