(06-27-2014 12:46 PM)HuskyU Wrote: The only move to make is an all-sports best of the rest conference. It'd be a mostly AAC/MWC line-up with the fat cut-out...
The problem with that idea, is that it's not really possible. To have only the "best" out of both conferences, you would have to expel some current members from each conference. You could never, IMO, convince the members who would be thrown under the bus to vote to let you do it. Consequently, the best you can hope for is that one of the two conferences will successfully poach the top teams from the other.
It's hard to see how the MWC could be the winner in that fight. So the likely outcome is a 16 team AAC, that is marginally stronger than the current lineup, and a badly weakened 8 team MWC. The new AAC may or may not be able to command more media revenue per school than it does now, and it will have to contend with some serious scheduling and travel issues for all sports. At the end of the day, you might be happier with your new situation and you might not.
The western teams that choose to break ranks could also find themselves treated like pariahs in their region. Those are likely to be the same schools that many in the region blame for killing the WAC. Now, those of us in the east might argue it needed killing. Nevertheless, If I were an AD at one of those schools, I might be afraid I'll have trouble finding anybody reputable to play me out of conference. And not just in football.
And when all is said and done, you are still a G5 conference. You'll have to divide your considerable non-football revenues 16 ways instead of 12, and you probably won't get any more tournament bids to make that less of a financial hit. If I'm the AAC and I have a choice between going that route or standing pat, I'm standing pat.