QuestionSocratic
Banned
Posts: 8,222
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: Buffalo
Location:
|
Corporate tax policy at work
Medtronic, a big player in the medical device market, has agreed to buy competitor Covidien for $43 billion. Since Covidien is domiciled in Ireland, and through a process referred to as "tax inversion", Medtronic will redomicile in Ireland with its 12% corporate tax rate. Medtronic had an effective US rate of 18%.
Medtronic was also at the center of the debate on the Obamacare medical device tax that uber-left wing politicians such as Stuart Smalley, Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden want repealed.
Oh, don't worry about jobs leaving the US. In order to redomicile in Ireland, all you need a post office box and an lawyer in Dublin.
Link to CNBC
|
|
| 06-16-2014 09:12 AM |
|
DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars

Posts: 35,844
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
 
|
RE: Corporate tax policy at work
You mean if you raise taxes, smart people will find ways around them?
|
|
| 06-16-2014 09:17 AM |
|
HeartOfDixie
Hall of Famer

Posts: 24,572
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
|
RE: Corporate tax policy at work
The Irish tax system is beautiful.
|
|
| 06-16-2014 09:24 AM |
|
VA49er
Legend

Posts: 32,603
Joined: Dec 2004
Reputation: 1423
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
|
RE: Corporate tax policy at work
Pfizer would have done the exact same thing if it had acquired Astra-Zenaca. That is, moved it's headquarters overseas to gain the better corporate tax rate. That's starting to be a larger motivation behind these huge mergers/buy-outs, etc.
|
|
| 06-16-2014 09:51 AM |
|
VA49er
Legend

Posts: 32,603
Joined: Dec 2004
Reputation: 1423
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
|
RE: Corporate tax policy at work
And it continues. Walgreens thinking of moving headquarters overseas to avoid high US corporate tax rate.
Walgreens Considers Move Abroad to Lower Taxes
Snippet:
Quote:Walgreen Co.'s Chief Executive Greg Wasson on Tuesday said for the first time that the company is weighing moving outside of the U.S., as it considers buying the shares it doesn't already own in European pharmacy group Alliance Boots GmbH(Switzerland).
Under pressure from shareholders to use a merger with Alliance Boots to cut its tax bill through a so-called inversion, Mr. Wasson said the company is looking at how to structure its tax liabilities as part of its discussions over whether to buy the remaining 55% of Alliance Boots it doesn't already own.
Walgreen, based in Deerfield, Ill., plans to hold a conference call in the coming weeks to lay out its plans.
(This post was last modified: 06-25-2014 03:30 PM by VA49er.)
|
|
| 06-25-2014 03:29 PM |
|
maximus
Banned
Posts: 28,795
Joined: Nov 2008
I Root For: MEMPHIS
Location:
|
RE: Corporate tax policy at work
It will continue until the leftists completely destroy the country.
I propose a 5 year 0% rate with a grace period to repatriate.
Next 5 years at 5%.
3rd 5 year period at 10%.
Cap at the 15th year at 13%
Flat rates all the way around.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
|
|
| 06-25-2014 03:36 PM |
|
Owl 69/70/75
Just an old rugby coach

Posts: 82,008
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3446
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

|
RE: Corporate tax policy at work
Here's what I don't understand.
On the one hand, leftists complain about US corporations moving operations overseas to escape US taxes and regulations.
On the other hand, they insist that raising taxes and implementing more regulations won't cause corporations to move more operations overseas.
Can one of our lefties explain how both of those work?
(This post was last modified: 06-25-2014 03:40 PM by Owl 69/70/75.)
|
|
| 06-25-2014 03:39 PM |
|
JMUDunk
Rootin' fer Dukes, bud

Posts: 32,507
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 2187
I Root For: Freedom
Location: Shmocation
|
RE: Corporate tax policy at work
(06-25-2014 03:39 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: Here's what I don't understand.
On the one hand, leftists complain about US corporations moving operations overseas to escape US taxes and regulations.
On the other hand, they insist that raising taxes and implementing more regulations won't cause corporations to move more operations overseas.
Can one of our lefties explain how both of those work?
Well, let's be honest here. It's not just that little dilemma, many want to triple down on the idiocy- They want to further "punish" (in whatever form they are proposing) corporations that move their HQ's or operations overseas. Talk about chasing them away in droves.
I've said it many times here, lefties, it's pretty simple. You want more of something? Make it profitable. You want less of something? Tax it. That really is how it works.
(This post was last modified: 06-25-2014 03:50 PM by JMUDunk.)
|
|
| 06-25-2014 03:49 PM |
|
Owl 69/70/75
Just an old rugby coach

Posts: 82,008
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3446
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

|
RE: Corporate tax policy at work
(06-25-2014 03:49 PM)JMUDunk Wrote: (06-25-2014 03:39 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: Here's what I don't understand.
On the one hand, leftists complain about US corporations moving operations overseas to escape US taxes and regulations.
On the other hand, they insist that raising taxes and implementing more regulations won't cause corporations to move more operations overseas.
Can one of our lefties explain how both of those work?
Well, let's be honest here. It's not just that little dilemma, many want to triple down on the idiocy- They want to further "punish" (in whatever form they are proposing) corporations that move their HQ's or operations overseas. Talk about chasing them away in droves.
I've said it many times here, lefties, it's pretty simple. You want more of something? Make it profitable. You want less of something? Tax it. That really is how it works.
That's about the size of it.
|
|
| 06-25-2014 03:54 PM |
|