They're rolling-out the list for this year. They've unveiled 50-25 and a list of "big names" that didn't make the Top 50. I guess they'll drag it out one name at a time for 24-1. A couple of familiar names so far:
No. 47: Bob Hoffman, Mercer
Hoffman has long been a respected member of the coaching fraternity. But it wasn't until March, when his Bears upset Duke (and potential No. 1 pick Jabari Parker) and Nay Nay'd their way into our hearts, that Hoffman crossed over into the mainstream.
No. 37: Rick Byrd, Belmont
Belmont is the best indie act in college hoops, a consistent offensive (and efficiency margin) powerhouse whose lack of a Cinderella run has kept the Bruins, and Byrd, under the radar. But those of us who spend all year obsessing over college hoops know and respect Tennessee's best-kept secret.
Oddly, the other Bruins head coach was #36.
http://espn.go.com/ncb/notebook?page=top...s50-25&wjb
Here's something to ponder: Per ESPN, "Which coaches are doing the best job
right now?" Consider that:
(1) Mercer went to the NCAA's, Belmont went to the NIT.
(2) Hoffman did something this season in just one try that Byrd failed to do twice in previous seasons . . . beat Duke (Belmont lost to them by 1 point both times . . . once in the NCAA's and once at Duke).
(3) Hoffman also did something this year in a single try that Byrd has failed to do in 7 tries . . . advance in the NCAA's.
So, did Byrd wrongly (
not erroneously, but wrongly) get ranked higher than Hoffman? I would say that, historically, Byrd is a better coach than Hoffman. But, did ESPN get it wrong for this particular list? Should Hoffman be ranked hire than Byrd
this year because of Mercer's success this past season?