According to the National Rifle Association, describing a shooting as a “shooting” is some kind of nefarious media plot to trick you into thinking of a shooting as a “shooting.”

http://bobcesca.thedailybanter.com/blog-...-guns.html

Why call it a shooting when Obama has already determined events like this to be either work place violence or man caused disasters?

I just love how some in this forum find a way to make everything about Obama.

Who was it that wanted "crosshairs" and "targets" banned from campaign ads. Let me see, it must have been the NRA. Those evil deceiving bastards.

(06-02-2014 04:25 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  According to the National Rifle Association, describing a shooting as a “shooting” is some kind of nefarious media plot to trick you into thinking of a shooting as a “shooting.”

Spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin.

So let me get this straight: A mentally ill child of immense privilege from a family that is very likely left of center who stabbed three victims shot three others and critically injured two more with his car in a gun-free zone in a state that has some of the toughest gun controls in the country……and this is the fault of the NRA?

He didn't say it was the fault of the NRA.

(06-02-2014 05:37 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  He didn't say it was the fault of the NRA.

Considering the date stamp on the link, are you suggesting it is in response to another event?

(06-02-2014 05:47 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(06-02-2014 05:37 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  He didn't say it was the fault of the NRA.

Considering the date stamp on the link, are you suggesting it is in response to another event?

You can read whatever you want into Fit's statement, but he didn't say it was the NRA's fault. He just said that the NRA doesn't want shootings to be referred to as shootings.