Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
Author Message
PirateMarv Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,508
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 191
I Root For: ECU
Location: Chicago and Memphis
Post: #41
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:04 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 02:50 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 02:46 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 02:39 PM)Blue Hell Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 12:24 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  FTR I really don't want Boise or San Deigo State at this point. I'd rather have UTEP to bridge the gap if BYU would come and be willing to come.

This is cool and all as it is just your opinion but at what point is pulling CUSA schools to much. True or not everyone outside of the AAC already thinks of the American as CUSA 2.0 not BE 3.0 adding another school is just adding to that thought process. IMO... I just think it would be better to get any school except those from CUSA.

This is why Boise left. And talking about BYU you realize they would ask for more than what BSU and Navy asked for but I guess after giving Navy a special deal BYU would not be a big reach.

Boise left because Kustra is a typical Illinois politician. He is only good at fleecing the stupid.

Boise left because after the TV $ came out no other western teams could be pulled to join them and SDSU and the nBE added a bunch of CUSA schools. Pretty much the entire MWC rejected moving over. I’m sure things are a lot different now though.

Boise left because Kustra saw a chance to fleece the MWC conference after his attempt at fleecing the AAC failed. The MWC is nothing but a bunch of WAC schools. No one cares about that league since Utah, TCU and BYU left. It is not a good league, which is the reason that SDSU was trying to stay with the AAC even after Boise backed out.
05-19-2014 03:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StillJonesing Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,042
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 88
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #42
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:04 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 11:45 AM)templefootballfan Wrote:  what i'm saying is BYU & Conn are P5 level now
doesn't matter what ACC & SEC say [besides the fact BYU would help at least 8 schools at the gate]
there are other schools have the tools to get there

BYU football is P5 worthy but UConn??

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

BYU is just P5 caliber period.

They average like top 25 support in both football and basketball and are a national draw. You don't really get much bigger time than that.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 03:12 PM by StillJonesing.)
05-19-2014 03:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StillJonesing Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,042
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 88
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #43
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:11 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  Boise left because Kustra saw a chance to fleece the MWC conference after his attempt at fleecing the AAC failed. The MWC is nothing but a bunch of WAC schools. No one cares about that league since Utah, TCU and BYU left. It is not a good league, which is the reason that SDSU was trying to stay with the AAC even after Boise backed out.

....and 10 years ago no one cared about or wanted to be around San Diego State in anything. 10 years from now who knows what Boise, San Deigo St even look like. Programs change a lot with coaching attrition. Honestly I'm glad it worked out the way it did and the only school I would extend interest in to the west coast for is BYU because of the backing they have.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 03:16 PM by StillJonesing.)
05-19-2014 03:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #44
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:11 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:04 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 02:50 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 02:46 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 02:39 PM)Blue Hell Wrote:  This is cool and all as it is just your opinion but at what point is pulling CUSA schools to much. True or not everyone outside of the AAC already thinks of the American as CUSA 2.0 not BE 3.0 adding another school is just adding to that thought process. IMO... I just think it would be better to get any school except those from CUSA.

This is why Boise left. And talking about BYU you realize they would ask for more than what BSU and Navy asked for but I guess after giving Navy a special deal BYU would not be a big reach.

Boise left because Kustra is a typical Illinois politician. He is only good at fleecing the stupid.

Boise left because after the TV $ came out no other western teams could be pulled to join them and SDSU and the nBE added a bunch of CUSA schools. Pretty much the entire MWC rejected moving over. I’m sure things are a lot different now though.

Boise left because Kustra saw a chance to fleece the MWC conference after his attempt at fleecing the AAC failed. The MWC is nothing but a bunch of WAC schools. No one cares about that league since Utah, TCU and BYU left. It is not a good league, which is the reason that SDSU was trying to stay with the AAC even after Boise backed out.

Does BSU make more $ off it's deal with the MWC or does Navy make more $ from it's deal with the AAC? Your statement is hilarious given what has happened to what was once the big east.
05-19-2014 03:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #45
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:15 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:11 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  Boise left because Kustra saw a chance to fleece the MWC conference after his attempt at fleecing the AAC failed. The MWC is nothing but a bunch of WAC schools. No one cares about that league since Utah, TCU and BYU left. It is not a good league, which is the reason that SDSU was trying to stay with the AAC even after Boise backed out.

....and 10 years ago no one cared about or wanted to be around San Diego State in anything. 10 years from now who knows what Boise, San Deigo St even look like. Programs change a lot with coaching attrition. Honestly I'm glad it worked out the way it did and the only school I would extend interest in to the west coast for is BYU because of the backing they have.

Man ECU is all grown up now....talking about who should and should not be added to confrences LOL
05-19-2014 03:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PirateMarv Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,508
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 191
I Root For: ECU
Location: Chicago and Memphis
Post: #46
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:16 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:11 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:04 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 02:50 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 02:46 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  This is why Boise left. And talking about BYU you realize they would ask for more than what BSU and Navy asked for but I guess after giving Navy a special deal BYU would not be a big reach.

Boise left because Kustra is a typical Illinois politician. He is only good at fleecing the stupid.

Boise left because after the TV $ came out no other western teams could be pulled to join them and SDSU and the nBE added a bunch of CUSA schools. Pretty much the entire MWC rejected moving over. I’m sure things are a lot different now though.

Boise left because Kustra saw a chance to fleece the MWC conference after his attempt at fleecing the AAC failed. The MWC is nothing but a bunch of WAC schools. No one cares about that league since Utah, TCU and BYU left. It is not a good league, which is the reason that SDSU was trying to stay with the AAC even after Boise backed out.

Does BSU make more $ off it's deal with the MWC or does Navy make more $ from it's deal with the AAC? Your statement is hilarious given what has happened to what was once the big east.

Navy is not in the AAC yet. They don't become an official member until the Summer of 2015. Kustra straight up robbed the MWC last Summer. Kustra is good at that type of thing and it helps that the MWC leadership were a bunch of rubes. And are you really trying to compare the Boise Trucking College to the Naval Academy? Boise's comparison is Marshall.

Your statement is hilarious given what has happened the MWC. No more Utah. No more TCU and no more BYU. What's left? New Mexico, Colorado State, Utah State and a bunch of other nothings.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 03:23 PM by PirateMarv.)
05-19-2014 03:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StillJonesing Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,042
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 88
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #47
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:16 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  Man ECU is all grown up now....talking about who should and should not be added to confrences LOL

The problem is Boise never grew. They won all those games and still plays in front of 30 something thousand in a stadium with a track around it. Your coach saw the writting on the wall he had ridden that horse into the ground. Serious question what happens now when you win 7 or 8 games and the 33k you were getting stop coming?

We certainly took a different approach and actually played many BCS schools, but I can't imagine if we had been scheduling our way to top 25's our facilites and support would still look like that.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 03:28 PM by StillJonesing.)
05-19-2014 03:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #48
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:22 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:16 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:11 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:04 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 02:50 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  Boise left because Kustra is a typical Illinois politician. He is only good at fleecing the stupid.

Boise left because after the TV $ came out no other western teams could be pulled to join them and SDSU and the nBE added a bunch of CUSA schools. Pretty much the entire MWC rejected moving over. I’m sure things are a lot different now though.

Boise left because Kustra saw a chance to fleece the MWC conference after his attempt at fleecing the AAC failed. The MWC is nothing but a bunch of WAC schools. No one cares about that league since Utah, TCU and BYU left. It is not a good league, which is the reason that SDSU was trying to stay with the AAC even after Boise backed out.

Does BSU make more $ off it's deal with the MWC or does Navy make more $ from it's deal with the AAC? Your statement is hilarious given what has happened to what was once the big east.

Navy is not in the AAC yet. They don't become an official member until the Summer of 2015. Kustra straight up robbed the MWC last Summer. Kustra is good at that type of thing and it helps that the MWC leadership were a bunch of rubes. And are you really trying to compare the Boise Trucking College to the Naval Academy? Boise's comparison is Marshall.

Your statement is hilarious given what has happened the MWC. No more Utah. No more TCU and no more BYU. What's left? New Mexico, Colorado State, Utah State and a bunch of other nothings.

Tell me some more about the MWC contract you know nothing about lol. Yep the MWC is a bunch of nothings......the nBE/AAC is on the verge of greatness right now. It's weird that the nBE/AAC could not pull any of the teams it wanted so had to resort to filling in with CUSA schools.
05-19-2014 03:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #49
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:24 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:16 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  Man ECU is all grown up now....talking about who should and should not be added to confrences LOL

The problem is Boise never grew. They won all those games and still plays in front of 30 something thousand in a stadium with a track around it. Your coach saw the writting on the wall he had ridden that horse into the ground and dropped it. Serious question what happens now when you win 7 or 8 games and the 33k you were getting stop coming?

We certainly took a different approach and actually played many BCS schools, but I can't imagine if we had been scheduling our way to top 25's our facilites and support would still look more like that.

Boise's facilities have been getting rave reviews from the recruits. I wonder why BSU only plays in front of 37k.......how come they never get any more to home games? I also wonder how BSU and ECU compare in TV eyeballs. Heading back to the Chick fil A game again this year in Atlanta.....will the AAC ever play in that game?
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 03:29 PM by EDLUVAR.)
05-19-2014 03:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PirateMarv Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,508
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 191
I Root For: ECU
Location: Chicago and Memphis
Post: #50
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:25 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:22 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:16 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:11 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:04 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  Boise left because after the TV $ came out no other western teams could be pulled to join them and SDSU and the nBE added a bunch of CUSA schools. Pretty much the entire MWC rejected moving over. I’m sure things are a lot different now though.

Boise left because Kustra saw a chance to fleece the MWC conference after his attempt at fleecing the AAC failed. The MWC is nothing but a bunch of WAC schools. No one cares about that league since Utah, TCU and BYU left. It is not a good league, which is the reason that SDSU was trying to stay with the AAC even after Boise backed out.

Does BSU make more $ off it's deal with the MWC or does Navy make more $ from it's deal with the AAC? Your statement is hilarious given what has happened to what was once the big east.

Navy is not in the AAC yet. They don't become an official member until the Summer of 2015. Kustra straight up robbed the MWC last Summer. Kustra is good at that type of thing and it helps that the MWC leadership were a bunch of rubes. And are you really trying to compare the Boise Trucking College to the Naval Academy? Boise's comparison is Marshall.

Your statement is hilarious given what has happened the MWC. No more Utah. No more TCU and no more BYU. What's left? New Mexico, Colorado State, Utah State and a bunch of other nothings.

Tell me some more about the MWC contract you know nothing about lol. Yep the MWC is a bunch of nothings......the nBE/AAC is on the verge of greatness right now. It's weird that the nBE/AAC could not pull any of the teams it wanted so had to resort to filling in with CUSA schools.

I know that you are delusional, but at least realize that you are still in the WAC. You can put your league under a different banner all that you want, but your league is still the WAC and your school is in the same garbage league that you have always been in, which consists of the same bunch of sheep schools that Boise State used to go undefeated against year in and year out. BTW, Boise is so great and so coveted that Aresco told Kustra to take a hike; and the 3 real MW schools (BYU, Utah and TCU) wouldn't even vote Boise into the league until those 3 schools were on their way out of the door.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 03:36 PM by PirateMarv.)
05-19-2014 03:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StillJonesing Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,042
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 88
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #51
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:27 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:24 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:16 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  Man ECU is all grown up now....talking about who should and should not be added to confrences LOL

The problem is Boise never grew. They won all those games and still plays in front of 30 something thousand in a stadium with a track around it. Your coach saw the writting on the wall he had ridden that horse into the ground and dropped it. Serious question what happens now when you win 7 or 8 games and the 33k you were getting stop coming?

We certainly took a different approach and actually played many BCS schools, but I can't imagine if we had been scheduling our way to top 25's our facilites and support would still look more like that.

Boise's facilities have been getting rave reviews from the recruits. I wonder why BSU only plays in front of 37k.......how come they never get any more to home games? I also wonder how BSU and ECU compare in TV eyeballs. Heading back to the Chick fil A game again this year in Atlanta.....will the AAC ever play in that game?

I don't really get the Chick Fil A game reference. We've played in the Peach Bowl before, we've played NC State, West Virginia, Virginia Tech, South Carolina in Charlotte on national TV plenty of times in a neutral setting as well as in our OWN stadium.

Dude, your success very likely went to the PAC 12. The rest of your brick and mortor/fanbase basically look exactly like you did 15 years ago or even before that. You never really turned any of it into something that actually looks like a P5 school.

At least we have drawn 50k in a season and sold it completely out a season and have more expansion on our stadium in the way to 60k. You could visit us on a game day and actually confuse us for a mid level P5 school, you couldn't Boise.

I wouldn't trade programs at this point. We are better right now under our current coach who's an alum that isn't leaving, always draw more, hell we averaged 33k like you did last year when we were 1-12 over a decade ago. We have nicer/larger facilities, have better schedules, and a better conference at this point. Hell we even beat you in a bowl the only time we played. I don't even think there was really a massive gap in our actual teams or talent most of those years you were scheduling your way to top 20's.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 04:16 PM by StillJonesing.)
05-19-2014 03:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #52
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:34 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:25 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:22 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:16 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:11 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  Boise left because Kustra saw a chance to fleece the MWC conference after his attempt at fleecing the AAC failed. The MWC is nothing but a bunch of WAC schools. No one cares about that league since Utah, TCU and BYU left. It is not a good league, which is the reason that SDSU was trying to stay with the AAC even after Boise backed out.

Does BSU make more $ off it's deal with the MWC or does Navy make more $ from it's deal with the AAC? Your statement is hilarious given what has happened to what was once the big east.

Navy is not in the AAC yet. They don't become an official member until the Summer of 2015. Kustra straight up robbed the MWC last Summer. Kustra is good at that type of thing and it helps that the MWC leadership were a bunch of rubes. And are you really trying to compare the Boise Trucking College to the Naval Academy? Boise's comparison is Marshall.

Your statement is hilarious given what has happened the MWC. No more Utah. No more TCU and no more BYU. What's left? New Mexico, Colorado State, Utah State and a bunch of other nothings.

Tell me some more about the MWC contract you know nothing about lol. Yep the MWC is a bunch of nothings......the nBE/AAC is on the verge of greatness right now. It's weird that the nBE/AAC could not pull any of the teams it wanted so had to resort to filling in with CUSA schools.

I know that you are delusional, but at least realize that you are still in the WAC. You can put your league under a different banner all that you want, but your league is still the WAC and your school is in the same garbage league that you have always been in, which consists of the same bunch of sheep schools that Boise State used to go undefeated against year in and year out. BTW, Boise is so great and so coveted that Aresco told Kustra to take a hike; and the 3 real MW schools (BYU, Utah and TCU) wouldn't even vote Boise into the league until those 3 schools were on their way out of the door.

Yep the MWC is the WAC and the nBE/AAC is CUSA....it is what it is. BSU and Hawaii had BCS 3 BCS bowl games while in the WAC I don't remember CUSA ever getting any LOL. And I don't think Boise is that great...but they were invited before ECU so there is that LOL
05-19-2014 04:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
StillJonesing Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,042
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 88
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #53
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
Enjoy playing in your 37k seat stadium in front of 34k if that vs who ever you are playing now. Maybe you can even get a nice sweat running around the track after class 07-coffee3.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 04:14 PM by StillJonesing.)
05-19-2014 04:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PirateMarv Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,508
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 191
I Root For: ECU
Location: Chicago and Memphis
Post: #54
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 04:08 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:34 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:25 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:22 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:16 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  Does BSU make more $ off it's deal with the MWC or does Navy make more $ from it's deal with the AAC? Your statement is hilarious given what has happened to what was once the big east.

Navy is not in the AAC yet. They don't become an official member until the Summer of 2015. Kustra straight up robbed the MWC last Summer. Kustra is good at that type of thing and it helps that the MWC leadership were a bunch of rubes. And are you really trying to compare the Boise Trucking College to the Naval Academy? Boise's comparison is Marshall.

Your statement is hilarious given what has happened the MWC. No more Utah. No more TCU and no more BYU. What's left? New Mexico, Colorado State, Utah State and a bunch of other nothings.

Tell me some more about the MWC contract you know nothing about lol. Yep the MWC is a bunch of nothings......the nBE/AAC is on the verge of greatness right now. It's weird that the nBE/AAC could not pull any of the teams it wanted so had to resort to filling in with CUSA schools.

I know that you are delusional, but at least realize that you are still in the WAC. You can put your league under a different banner all that you want, but your league is still the WAC and your school is in the same garbage league that you have always been in, which consists of the same bunch of sheep schools that Boise State used to go undefeated against year in and year out. BTW, Boise is so great and so coveted that Aresco told Kustra to take a hike; and the 3 real MW schools (BYU, Utah and TCU) wouldn't even vote Boise into the league until those 3 schools were on their way out of the door.

Yep the MWC is the WAC and the nBE/AAC is CUSA....it is what it is. BSU and Hawaii had BCS 3 BCS bowl games while in the WAC I don't remember CUSA ever getting any LOL. And I don't think Boise is that great...but they were invited before ECU so there is that LOL

The guy who pushed the Boise's invitation was fired and replaced by the guy that told Boise to go and take a hike. Go figure.

And it was really easy to go to a BCS game from the WAC and MAC. Your conference mates are completely dreadful, which is why the BCS was called B.S. to begin with. You just explained why they put strength of schedule component in then new playoff system.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2014 04:24 PM by PirateMarv.)
05-19-2014 04:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #55
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 03:40 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:27 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:24 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:16 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  Man ECU is all grown up now....talking about who should and should not be added to confrences LOL

The problem is Boise never grew. They won all those games and still plays in front of 30 something thousand in a stadium with a track around it. Your coach saw the writting on the wall he had ridden that horse into the ground and dropped it. Serious question what happens now when you win 7 or 8 games and the 33k you were getting stop coming?

We certainly took a different approach and actually played many BCS schools, but I can't imagine if we had been scheduling our way to top 25's our facilites and support would still look more like that.

Boise's facilities have been getting rave reviews from the recruits. I wonder why BSU only plays in front of 37k.......how come they never get any more to home games? I also wonder how BSU and ECU compare in TV eyeballs. Heading back to the Chick fil A game again this year in Atlanta.....will the AAC ever play in that game?

I don't really get the Chick Fil A game reference. We've played in the Peach Bowl before, we've played NC State, West Virginia, Virginia Tech, South Carolina in Charlotte on national TV plenty of times in a neutral setting as well as in our OWN stadium.

Dude, your success very likely went to the PAC 12. The rest of your brick and mortor/fanbase basically look exactly like you did 15 years ago or even before that. You never really turned any of it into something that actually looks like a P5 school.

At least we have drawn 50k in a season and sold it completely out a season and have more expansion on our stadium in the way to 60k. You could visit us on a game day and actually confuse us for a mid level P5 school, you couldn't Boise.

I wouldn't trade programs at this point. We are better right now under our current coach who's an alum that isn't leaving, always draw more, hell we averaged 33k like you did last year when we were 1-12 over a decade ago. We have nicer/larger facilities, have better schedules, and a better conference at this point. Hell we even beat you in a bowl the only time we played. I don't even think there was really a massive gap in our actual teams or talent most of those years you were scheduling your way to top 20's.


There has been plenty of work done the past 10 years on Bronco Stadium

Current/future expansion[edit]
Caven-Williams Sports Complex
Stueckle Sky Club (2008) in October 2009
South end zone expansion in 2009As the Boise State football program rose to national prominence in the early 2000s, Bronco Stadium became increasingly insufficient. The school completed a 3-story complex on the stadium's west side called the Stueckle Sky Club (pronounced Stickle). Construction began on it on February 11, 2007, and it officially opened on August 27, 2008 with a gala for ticket holders prior to the first game on August 30.[32] It features levels for a new press box, luxury suites, loge boxes, and club seating and increased seating capacity to 32,000.

The practice facility, named the Caven-Williams Sports Complex, officially opened in February 2006, and it is located immediately northwest of Bronco Stadium.[33] Additional temporary seating of 1,500 was added prior to the 2009 season. The removable bleachers increased capacity to 33,500. Permanent bleachers were also added to the north and south end zones prior to the 2012 season, raising Bronco Stadium's capacity to a total of 37,000.

In late August 2010, new expansion plans were revealed for Bronco Stadium. The first stages were to include adding a new facility to the north endzone to house the football offices, weight room, training room, equipment room and locker room. Plans also included a 13,200 seat grandstand. The later stages of the expansion plan included removal of the track, lowering of the field, and adding 3,300 seats in front of the first deck of the stadium, completion of the south endzone horseshoe, building of an east side skybox, and renovation of the east side concourse. The total cost for all planned expansions was around $100 million. The total seating capacity for a fully expanded Bronco Stadium was estimated to be around 53,000.[34] The Boise State athletic director aims to have the north endzone complex open in time for the 2013 season and does not resemble the 2010 plans
05-19-2014 04:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #56
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 04:23 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 04:08 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:34 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:25 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:22 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  Navy is not in the AAC yet. They don't become an official member until the Summer of 2015. Kustra straight up robbed the MWC last Summer. Kustra is good at that type of thing and it helps that the MWC leadership were a bunch of rubes. And are you really trying to compare the Boise Trucking College to the Naval Academy? Boise's comparison is Marshall.

Your statement is hilarious given what has happened the MWC. No more Utah. No more TCU and no more BYU. What's left? New Mexico, Colorado State, Utah State and a bunch of other nothings.

Tell me some more about the MWC contract you know nothing about lol. Yep the MWC is a bunch of nothings......the nBE/AAC is on the verge of greatness right now. It's weird that the nBE/AAC could not pull any of the teams it wanted so had to resort to filling in with CUSA schools.

I know that you are delusional, but at least realize that you are still in the WAC. You can put your league under a different banner all that you want, but your league is still the WAC and your school is in the same garbage league that you have always been in, which consists of the same bunch of sheep schools that Boise State used to go undefeated against year in and year out. BTW, Boise is so great and so coveted that Aresco told Kustra to take a hike; and the 3 real MW schools (BYU, Utah and TCU) wouldn't even vote Boise into the league until those 3 schools were on their way out of the door.

Yep the MWC is the WAC and the nBE/AAC is CUSA....it is what it is. BSU and Hawaii had BCS 3 BCS bowl games while in the WAC I don't remember CUSA ever getting any LOL. And I don't think Boise is that great...but they were invited before ECU so there is that LOL

The guy who pushed the Boise's invitation was fired and replaced by the guy that told Boise to go and take a hike. Go figure.

And it was really easy to go to a BCS game from the WAC and MAC. Your conference mates are completely dreadful, which is why the BCS was called B.S. to begin with. You just explained why they put strength of schedule component in then new playoff system.

NEW YORK (AP) — The Big East tried to work a deal to keep Boise State on board, but was “unwilling” to give the Broncos the deal that kept them in the Mountain West.

“We worked hard with Boise,” Big East Commissioner Mike Aresco told The Associated Press in a phone interview Tuesday. “We explored a lot of different ways to keep them. No question. "


LOL is that how the rest go tells teams to "take a hike"
05-19-2014 04:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
EDLUVAR Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,865
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 40
I Root For: Boise St.
Location: Boise Idaho
Post: #57
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 04:14 PM)StillJonesing Wrote:  Enjoy playing in your 37k seat stadium in front of 34k if that vs who ever you are playing now. Maybe you can even get a nice sweat running around the track after class 07-coffee3.

Will do. How many AAC teams average over 37k for attendance? I mean thats a sell out in Boise but with such big time programs like y'all have I bet thats in last place here.
05-19-2014 04:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
KNIGHTTIME Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,511
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 308
I Root For: '17 Natty Champ
Location:
Post: #58
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
Is Boise planning on getting rid of the track? I don't think it is really necessary to toss insults between ECU and Boise. That is for ucf and ECU to do.04-cheers
05-19-2014 04:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PirateMarv Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,508
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 191
I Root For: ECU
Location: Chicago and Memphis
Post: #59
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
(05-19-2014 04:40 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 04:23 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 04:08 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:34 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  
(05-19-2014 03:25 PM)EDLUVAR Wrote:  Tell me some more about the MWC contract you know nothing about lol. Yep the MWC is a bunch of nothings......the nBE/AAC is on the verge of greatness right now. It's weird that the nBE/AAC could not pull any of the teams it wanted so had to resort to filling in with CUSA schools.

I know that you are delusional, but at least realize that you are still in the WAC. You can put your league under a different banner all that you want, but your league is still the WAC and your school is in the same garbage league that you have always been in, which consists of the same bunch of sheep schools that Boise State used to go undefeated against year in and year out. BTW, Boise is so great and so coveted that Aresco told Kustra to take a hike; and the 3 real MW schools (BYU, Utah and TCU) wouldn't even vote Boise into the league until those 3 schools were on their way out of the door.

Yep the MWC is the WAC and the nBE/AAC is CUSA....it is what it is. BSU and Hawaii had BCS 3 BCS bowl games while in the WAC I don't remember CUSA ever getting any LOL. And I don't think Boise is that great...but they were invited before ECU so there is that LOL

The guy who pushed the Boise's invitation was fired and replaced by the guy that told Boise to go and take a hike. Go figure.

And it was really easy to go to a BCS game from the WAC and MAC. Your conference mates are completely dreadful, which is why the BCS was called B.S. to begin with. You just explained why they put strength of schedule component in then new playoff system.

NEW YORK (AP) — The Big East tried to work a deal to keep Boise State on board, but was “unwilling” to give the Broncos the deal that kept them in the Mountain West.

“We worked hard with Boise,” Big East Commissioner Mike Aresco told The Associated Press in a phone interview Tuesday. “We explored a lot of different ways to keep them. No question. "


LOL is that how the rest go tells teams to "take a hike"

Yes. Let me translate:

You potato eating truck driving school dummies can get the Hell up out of here with that special deal crap. You are not putting the screws to us.
05-19-2014 04:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pony94 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 25,699
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 1187
I Root For: SMU
Location: Bee Cave, TX
Post: #60
RE: Can BYU potentially change the landscape for the non P5?
We want our $5,000,000
05-19-2014 04:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.