(01-27-2014 10:04 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:00 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 09:28 AM)VA49er Wrote:  Dude handled it well it seems. If that guy didn't want his money pretty sure someone else did. I mean, I'm guessing he still got his Christmas cards made, which is all he wanted in the first place.

Yes, he handled it like any normal person would.

Well, "normal" is relative these days. He could have made a big spectacle about it, etc but decided to take the high road and actually respect the other guys opinion. Seemed kind of nice for a change.

Why do Conservatives always have to be the big boy in these ssituations? We continue to let the left act childish and turn the other cheek. If we don't, we're homophobe racist bigots who hate everybody.

(01-27-2014 10:35 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Why do Conservatives always have to be the big boy in these ssituations? We continue to let the left act childish and turn the other cheek. If we don't, we're homophobe racist bigots who hate everybody.

I questioned whether there was grounds for a civil lawsuit in the first place and you responded with:

Quote:You and your fellow fags are the same ones who were pissing your pants and crying over a Conservative Christian who refused to decorate a cake or take photos of the faggotry of a gay wedding. You're like john01992 rebooted. Go away you f*cking weirdo.

Yeah, why would anyone mistake you for a hateful person?

(01-27-2014 10:38 AM)Hitch Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:35 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Why do Conservatives always have to be the big boy in these ssituations? We continue to let the left act childish and turn the other cheek. If we don't, we're homophobe racist bigots who hate everybody.

I questioned whether there was grounds for a civil lawsuit in the first place and you responded with:

Quote:You and your fellow fags are the same ones who were pissing your pants and crying over a Conservative Christian who refused to decorate a cake or take photos of the faggotry of a gay wedding. You're like john01992 rebooted. Go away you f*cking weirdo.

Yeah, why would anyone mistake you for a hateful person?

And people like LSU wonder why they get accused of being bigoted.

Anti discrimination laws, on the Federal level are the least encompassing. State laws vary in their degree.

They all follow the same general theme, to discriminate, in an act of contract, which is a legal term which roughly follows the idea of association, is to subject one to the liability mentioned in the act.

(01-27-2014 10:41 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Anti discrimination laws, on the Federal level are the least encompassing. State laws vary in their degree.

They all follow the same general theme, to discriminate, in an act of contract, which is a legal term which roughly follows the idea of association, is to subject one to the liability mentioned in the act.

How would you describe the strength of Mr. Sears' case if he were to decide to pursue legal action?

(01-27-2014 10:40 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:38 AM)Hitch Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:35 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Why do Conservatives always have to be the big boy in these ssituations? We continue to let the left act childish and turn the other cheek. If we don't, we're homophobe racist bigots who hate everybody.

I questioned whether there was grounds for a civil lawsuit in the first place and you responded with:

Quote:You and your fellow fags are the same ones who were pissing your pants and crying over a Conservative Christian who refused to decorate a cake or take photos of the faggotry of a gay wedding. You're like john01992 rebooted. Go away you f*cking weirdo.

Yeah, why would anyone mistake you for a hateful person?

And people like LSU wonder why they get accused of being bigoted.

Do you understand what a bigot is?

(01-27-2014 10:38 AM)Hitch Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:35 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Why do Conservatives always have to be the big boy in these ssituations? We continue to let the left act childish and turn the other cheek. If we don't, we're homophobe racist bigots who hate everybody.

I questioned whether there was grounds for a civil lawsuit in the first place and you responded with:

Quote:You and your fellow fags are the same ones who were pissing your pants and crying over a Conservative Christian who refused to decorate a cake or take photos of the faggotry of a gay wedding. You're like john01992 rebooted. Go away you f*cking weirdo.

Yeah, why would anyone mistake you for a hateful person?

Like I said, when we don't turn our cheek to your bullsh*t antics, we get called hateful. And you really are a f*cking weirdo. Thanks for proving my point.

(01-27-2014 10:46 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:38 AM)Hitch Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:35 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Why do Conservatives always have to be the big boy in these ssituations? We continue to let the left act childish and turn the other cheek. If we don't, we're homophobe racist bigots who hate everybody.

I questioned whether there was grounds for a civil lawsuit in the first place and you responded with:

Quote:You and your fellow fags are the same ones who were pissing your pants and crying over a Conservative Christian who refused to decorate a cake or take photos of the faggotry of a gay wedding. You're like john01992 rebooted. Go away you f*cking weirdo.

Yeah, why would anyone mistake you for a hateful person?

Like I said, when we don't turn our cheek to your bullsh*t antics, we get called hateful. And you really are a f*cking weirdo. Thanks for proving my point.

Let's, see you're the one insulting people on this board. You are the hateful person here.

You're f@cking deluded if you think you're immune from being called out when you blatantly insult someone.

(01-27-2014 10:46 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:38 AM)Hitch Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:35 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Why do Conservatives always have to be the big boy in these ssituations? We continue to let the left act childish and turn the other cheek. If we don't, we're homophobe racist bigots who hate everybody.

I questioned whether there was grounds for a civil lawsuit in the first place and you responded with:

Quote:You and your fellow fags are the same ones who were pissing your pants and crying over a Conservative Christian who refused to decorate a cake or take photos of the faggotry of a gay wedding. You're like john01992 rebooted. Go away you f*cking weirdo.

Yeah, why would anyone mistake you for a hateful person?

Like I said, when we don't turn our cheek to your bullsh*t antics, we get called hateful. And you really are a f*cking weirdo. Thanks for proving my point.

If you find yourself in a conversation that is wildly over your head, there's no shame in staying quiet.

(01-27-2014 10:43 AM)Hitch Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:41 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Anti discrimination laws, on the Federal level are the least encompassing. State laws vary in their degree.

They all follow the same general theme, to discriminate, in an act of contract, which is a legal term which roughly follows the idea of association, is to subject one to the liability mentioned in the act.

How would you describe the strength of Mr. Sears' case if he were to decide to pursue legal action?

I can't really answer that. We'd need to know more about what happened.

FTR...

Bigot: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices

We're all bigots, I challenge any of you to find where I've called another person a bigot while not calling myself one at the same time. Damn hypocrites, especially you, dmac, and your relentless drive to prove global warming is real. Don't ever call another person a bigot without pointing to your own self. And Hitch, don't even get me started on your beliefs, f*cker.

(01-27-2014 10:49 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:43 AM)Hitch Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:41 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Anti discrimination laws, on the Federal level are the least encompassing. State laws vary in their degree.

They all follow the same general theme, to discriminate, in an act of contract, which is a legal term which roughly follows the idea of association, is to subject one to the liability mentioned in the act.

How would you describe the strength of Mr. Sears' case if he were to decide to pursue legal action?

I can't really answer that. We'd need to know more about what happened.

I can respect that response.

(01-27-2014 10:50 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  FTR...

Bigot: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices

We're all bigots, I challenge any of you to find where I've called another person a bigot while not calling myself one at the same time. Damn hypocrites, especially you, dmac, and your relentless drive to prove global warming is real. Don't ever call another person a bigot without pointing to your own self. And Hitch, don't even get me started on your beliefs, f*cker.

I don't insult people just because they disagree with me. I accept that people have opinions opposed to mine. That's why I'm not a bigot and you are.

I insult everybody, wether you agree or disagree; you're never safe. LOL

(01-27-2014 10:47 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:46 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:38 AM)Hitch Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:35 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  Why do Conservatives always have to be the big boy in these ssituations? We continue to let the left act childish and turn the other cheek. If we don't, we're homophobe racist bigots who hate everybody.

I questioned whether there was grounds for a civil lawsuit in the first place and you responded with:

Quote:You and your fellow fags are the same ones who were pissing your pants and crying over a Conservative Christian who refused to decorate a cake or take photos of the faggotry of a gay wedding. You're like john01992 rebooted. Go away you f*cking weirdo.

Yeah, why would anyone mistake you for a hateful person?

Like I said, when we don't turn our cheek to your bullsh*t antics, we get called hateful. And you really are a f*cking weirdo. Thanks for proving my point.

Let's, see you're the one insulting people on this board. You are the hateful person here.

You're f@cking deluded if you think you're immune from being called out when you blatantly insult someone.

Suck it up, you and Hitch and being too tender. Grow some thicker skin, you used to be cool other than your GW push. Looks like you're falling by the wayside.

(01-27-2014 10:52 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(01-27-2014 10:50 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  FTR...

Bigot: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices

We're all bigots, I challenge any of you to find where I've called another person a bigot while not calling myself one at the same time. Damn hypocrites, especially you, dmac, and your relentless drive to prove global warming is real. Don't ever call another person a bigot without pointing to your own self. And Hitch, don't even get me started on your beliefs, f*cker.

I don't insult people just because they disagree with me. I accept that people have opinions opposed to mine. That's why I'm not a bigot and you are.

You still don't get it. I accept that many opinions differ from mine as well, so there's that.

(01-27-2014 10:54 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  I insult everybody, wether you agree or disagree; you're never safe. LOL

Thug!

It violates my rights and is discriminatory that I can't turn on the TV without seeing blatant leftist propaganda.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...-marriage/

Quote:This year, the Grammy Awards weren't just about the music, they were also about making a statement in the same-sex marriage debate.

Heavily hyped in the hours leading up to Sunday night's show, 34 couples -- both gay and straight -- exchanged rings and said "I do," as officiated on stage by Queen Latifah. The actress/rapper/talk show host was recently deputized by Los Angeles County to legally conduct wedding ceremonies and will sign the marriage certificates for each couple.

FWIW, I never even turned it on because I like music, not propaganda, and know the Leftist can't help themselves anymore. They've gone FULL RETARD.

(01-27-2014 11:03 AM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:  It violates my rights and is discriminatory that I can't turn on the TV without seeing blatant leftist propaganda.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...-marriage/

Quote:This year, the Grammy Awards weren't just about the music, they were also about making a statement in the same-sex marriage debate.

Heavily hyped in the hours leading up to Sunday night's show, 34 couples -- both gay and straight -- exchanged rings and said "I do," as officiated on stage by Queen Latifah. The actress/rapper/talk show host was recently deputized by Los Angeles County to legally conduct wedding ceremonies and will sign the marriage certificates for each couple.

FWIW, I never even turned it on because I like music, not propaganda, and know the Leftist can't help themselves anymore. They've gone FULL RETARD.

I found that whole act disgusting.

(01-27-2014 11:03 AM)Jerry Falwell Wrote:  It violates my rights and is discriminatory that I can't turn on the TV without seeing blatant leftist propaganda.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...-marriage/

Quote:This year, the Grammy Awards weren't just about the music, they were also about making a statement in the same-sex marriage debate.

Heavily hyped in the hours leading up to Sunday night's show, 34 couples -- both gay and straight -- exchanged rings and said "I do," as officiated on stage by Queen Latifah. The actress/rapper/talk show host was recently deputized by Los Angeles County to legally conduct wedding ceremonies and will sign the marriage certificates for each couple.

FWIW, I never even turned it on because I like music, not propaganda, and know the Leftist can't help themselves anymore. They've gone FULL RETARD.

Now you've done it. Facts never sit well with libs and their faggotry.