(12-29-2013 09:47 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:43 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:35 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:33 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 06:46 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Go on.

As I said, if the sites are generic dating sites, the default is going to be white. It'll be about 75% white and that's an obstacle towards people that fall on the outside of that.

I find that to be offensive. Why is it ok for other groups to have special clubs, but white clubs are for everyone?

It's not a club. It's a business that caters to a niche. There are plenty that cater to ethnically Irish, Italian, Jews, Germans, etc.

I fully understand what you're saying and why. But what I believe Okie is getting at is that anything considered to be exclusively white would be racist, while the same thing done with a different ethnic group would not.

exactly, and just because whites are the majority doesn't make that any less racist.

(12-29-2013 09:45 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:43 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:35 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:33 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 06:46 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Go on.

As I said, if the sites are generic dating sites, the default is going to be white. It'll be about 75% white and that's an obstacle towards people that fall on the outside of that.

I find that to be offensive. Why is it ok for other groups to have special clubs, but white clubs are for everyone?

It's not a club. It's a business that caters to a niche. There are plenty that cater to ethnically Irish, Italian, Jews, Germans, etc.

Then we should have a white site as well.

Are owning, controlling and holding a strong majority in the major ones and most of the smaller ones not enough?

(12-29-2013 09:51 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:45 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:43 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:35 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:33 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  As I said, if the sites are generic dating sites, the default is going to be white. It'll be about 75% white and that's an obstacle towards people that fall on the outside of that.

I find that to be offensive. Why is it ok for other groups to have special clubs, but white clubs are for everyone?

It's not a club. It's a business that caters to a niche. There are plenty that cater to ethnically Irish, Italian, Jews, Germans, etc.

Then we should have a white site as well.

Are owning, controlling and holding a strong majority in the major ones and most of the smaller ones not enough?

That is extremely offensive.

(12-29-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:51 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:45 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:43 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:35 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I find that to be offensive. Why is it ok for other groups to have special clubs, but white clubs are for everyone?

It's not a club. It's a business that caters to a niche. There are plenty that cater to ethnically Irish, Italian, Jews, Germans, etc.

Then we should have a white site as well.

Are owning, controlling and holding a strong majority in the major ones and most of the smaller ones not enough?

That is extremely offensive.

I didn't know sheer power and market control were offensive.

(12-29-2013 09:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:51 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:45 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:43 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  It's not a club. It's a business that caters to a niche. There are plenty that cater to ethnically Irish, Italian, Jews, Germans, etc.

Then we should have a white site as well.

Are owning, controlling and holding a strong majority in the major ones and most of the smaller ones not enough?

That is extremely offensive.

I didn't know sheer power and market control were offensive.

I find it offensive that you don't see a problem.

If blacks have an exclusive club, then whites should be afforded the same.

(12-29-2013 09:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:51 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:45 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Then we should have a white site as well.

Are owning, controlling and holding a strong majority in the major ones and most of the smaller ones not enough?

That is extremely offensive.

I didn't know sheer power and market control were offensive.

I find it offensive that you don't see a problem.

If blacks have an exclusive club, then whites should be afforded the same.

It's amazing that the exclusively black club in question has you as a member.

(12-29-2013 10:04 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:51 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Are owning, controlling and holding a strong majority in the major ones and most of the smaller ones not enough?

That is extremely offensive.

I didn't know sheer power and market control were offensive.

I find it offensive that you don't see a problem.

If blacks have an exclusive club, then whites should be afforded the same.

It's amazing that the exclusively black club in question has you as a member.

I was rejected.

If you want equality, it has to be equal for all, right?

Reverse racism is worse than regular racism according to some university of Phoenix studies.

(12-29-2013 10:07 PM)WPDAWG08 Wrote:  Reverse racism is worse than regular racism according to studies.

agreed.

(12-29-2013 10:04 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:51 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  Are owning, controlling and holding a strong majority in the major ones and most of the smaller ones not enough?

That is extremely offensive.

I didn't know sheer power and market control were offensive.

I find it offensive that you don't see a problem.

If blacks have an exclusive club, then whites should be afforded the same.

It's amazing that the exclusively black club in question has you as a member.

Okie's black? Who knew?

(12-29-2013 10:08 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 10:04 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  That is extremely offensive.

I didn't know sheer power and market control were offensive.

I find it offensive that you don't see a problem.

If blacks have an exclusive club, then whites should be afforded the same.

It's amazing that the exclusively black club in question has you as a member.

Okie's black? Who knew?

I'm not.

(12-29-2013 10:07 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 10:04 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  That is extremely offensive.

I didn't know sheer power and market control were offensive.

I find it offensive that you don't see a problem.

If blacks have an exclusive club, then whites should be afforded the same.

It's amazing that the exclusively black club in question has you as a member.

I was rejected.

If you want equality, it has to be equal for all, right?

I call BS. You "signed up" under the premise of an experiment. If you were rejected, you would've mentioned it way earlier to prove a point.

(12-29-2013 10:09 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 10:08 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 10:04 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  I didn't know sheer power and market control were offensive.

I find it offensive that you don't see a problem.

If blacks have an exclusive club, then whites should be afforded the same.

It's amazing that the exclusively black club in question has you as a member.

Okie's black? Who knew?

I'm not.

So, the club isn't all that exclusive?

(12-29-2013 10:13 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 10:09 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 10:08 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 10:04 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I find it offensive that you don't see a problem.

If blacks have an exclusive club, then whites should be afforded the same.

It's amazing that the exclusively black club in question has you as a member.

Okie's black? Who knew?

I'm not.

So, the club isn't all that exclusive?

Read the exchange again.

The f*cking outrage I tell ya....

Where did y'all hear black girls aren't into white guys? My brother married a black girl. I've seen a plethora of interracial relationships between white guys and black girls. I guess living in the middle of nowhere you don't see culture and sh*t at work.

(12-29-2013 10:17 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  The f*cking outrage I tell ya....

Where did y'all hear black girls aren't into white guys? My brother married a black girl. I've seen a plethora of interracial relationships between white guys and black girls. I guess living in the middle of nowhere you don't see culture and sh*t at work.

If you are referring to me, Oklahoma is not out in the middle of nowhere, has a high Black population and is more diverse than NC.

But I'm glad you don't have a problem with a meet white people dot com.

(12-29-2013 10:17 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  The f*cking outrage I tell ya....

Where did y'all hear black girls aren't into white guys? My brother married a black girl. I've seen a plethora of interracial relationships between white guys and black girls. I guess living in the middle of nowhere you don't see culture and sh*t at work.

Most interracial marriages I've seen have the dude being black and the chick being white...and that includes the marriage of one of my cousins.

(12-27-2013 07:16 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Somebody needs to make a website call LookingForAGoodBowlGameOnTV.com

So true.

No reason for anyone to be offended by MeetBlackPeople.com, nor would there be any reason to be offended by MeetWhitePeople.com if there ever is such a thing. Yet we all know that such a website would become a focus of controversy and (ahem) "discussion" in the media. That is the inconsistency that is being pointed out.

As others have mentioned, there are 100s of dating websites that cater to every imaginable demographic slice of the population (except "white people", of course). Which makes it all the more remarkable that EHarmony could be coerced into including a homo-dating section on its website a few years ago. But that is (of course) exactly what happened.

(12-29-2013 10:07 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 10:04 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:58 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:56 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(12-29-2013 09:54 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  That is extremely offensive.

I didn't know sheer power and market control were offensive.

I find it offensive that you don't see a problem.

If blacks have an exclusive club, then whites should be afforded the same.

It's amazing that the exclusively black club in question has you as a member.

I was rejected.

If you want equality, it has to be equal for all, right?

You got rejected? On what grounds? Now that is racist. The site isn't.

(12-27-2013 05:42 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  How is that not racist? Can you imagine if there was a dating site called MeetWhitePeople.Com? I don't get the difference. I know that Blacks are a minority, but how does that make the site not racist?

There is

It's called Farmersonly.com