(12-22-2013 09:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:18 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:15 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Yes, Buchanan was gay, and a terrible president.

Is this your next angle for promoting gay marriage?

Wait. What?

We apparently have elected a gay president. We can allow gay marriage.

(12-22-2013 09:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:18 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:15 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Yes, Buchanan was gay, and a terrible president.

Is this your next angle for promoting gay marriage?

Wait. What?

We apparently have elected a gay president. We can allow gay marriage.

That's not a good argument, either way, but then you're the one that made that particular leap.

(12-22-2013 09:30 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:18 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:15 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Yes, Buchanan was gay, and a terrible president.

Is this your next angle for promoting gay marriage?

Wait. What?

We apparently have elected a gay president. We can allow gay marriage.

That's not a good argument, either way, but then you're the one that made that particular leap.

I'm asking you if that is your new argument, since calling everyone xenophobes isn't working.

(12-22-2013 09:32 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:30 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:18 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Is this your next angle for promoting gay marriage?

Wait. What?

We apparently have elected a gay president. We can allow gay marriage.

That's not a good argument, either way, but then you're the one that made that particular leap.

I'm asking you if that is your new argument, since calling everyone xenophobes isn't working.

Making stuff up now, I see...

(12-22-2013 09:32 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:30 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:18 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  Is this your next angle for promoting gay marriage?

Wait. What?

We apparently have elected a gay president. We can allow gay marriage.

That's not a good argument, either way, but then you're the one that made that particular leap.

I'm asking you if that is your new argument, since calling everyone xenophobes isn't working.

1. I wasn't making any argument.

2. I've called exactly one person a xenophobe.

3. You're making less sense with every post. Maybe you should call it an evening. The Eagles/Bears isn't much of a game, but it's something.

(12-22-2013 09:43 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:32 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:30 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Wait. What?

We apparently have elected a gay president. We can allow gay marriage.

That's not a good argument, either way, but then you're the one that made that particular leap.

I'm asking you if that is your new argument, since calling everyone xenophobes isn't working.

1. I wasn't making any argument.

2. I've called exactly one person a xenophobe.

3. You're making less sense with every post. Maybe you should call it an evening. The Eagles/Bears isn't much of a game, but it's something.

I made my point hours ago. It has not waivered. Nor have you made any viable argument to convince me that gay marriage is fine or something we should allow in this country.

I'm just responding to your flailing and chaotic attempt to hang on.

(12-22-2013 09:51 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:43 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:32 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:30 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  We apparently have elected a gay president. We can allow gay marriage.

That's not a good argument, either way, but then you're the one that made that particular leap.

I'm asking you if that is your new argument, since calling everyone xenophobes isn't working.

1. I wasn't making any argument.

2. I've called exactly one person a xenophobe.

3. You're making less sense with every post. Maybe you should call it an evening. The Eagles/Bears isn't much of a game, but it's something.

I made my point hours ago. It has not waivered. Nor have you made any viable argument to convince me that gay marriage is fine or something we should allow in this country.

I'm just responding to your flailing and chaotic attempt to hang on.

You never had a point to make...just incoherent rambling

(12-22-2013 09:51 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:43 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:32 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:30 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:28 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  We apparently have elected a gay president. We can allow gay marriage.

That's not a good argument, either way, but then you're the one that made that particular leap.

I'm asking you if that is your new argument, since calling everyone xenophobes isn't working.

1. I wasn't making any argument.

2. I've called exactly one person a xenophobe.

3. You're making less sense with every post. Maybe you should call it an evening. The Eagles/Bears isn't much of a game, but it's something.

I made my point hours ago. It has not waivered.

Yes, you have been committed to the same wrong-headed opinion all day. Congratulations.

Quote:Nor have you made any viable argument to convince me that gay marriage is fine or something we should allow in this country.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Quote:I'm just responding to your flailing and chaotic attempt to hang on.

Oh, is THAT what you call it?

(12-22-2013 10:17 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:51 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:43 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:32 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:30 PM)Smaug Wrote:  That's not a good argument, either way, but then you're the one that made that particular leap.

I'm asking you if that is your new argument, since calling everyone xenophobes isn't working.

1. I wasn't making any argument.

2. I've called exactly one person a xenophobe.

3. You're making less sense with every post. Maybe you should call it an evening. The Eagles/Bears isn't much of a game, but it's something.

I made my point hours ago. It has not waivered.

Yes, you have been committed to the same wrong-headed opinion all day. Congratulations.

Quote:Nor have you made any viable argument to convince me that gay marriage is fine or something we should allow in this country.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Quote:I'm just responding to your flailing and chaotic attempt to hang on.

Oh, is THAT what you call it?

Spare me your words of enlightenment, progress boy. I am against gay marriage and a proponent of the traditional family. Stop being so intolerant and xenophobic.

Heh, I just said your opinion was wrong, not that you weren't entitled to it.

People walk around wrong every day. You'll be fine.

(12-22-2013 10:22 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 10:17 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:51 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:43 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 09:32 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  I'm asking you if that is your new argument, since calling everyone xenophobes isn't working.

1. I wasn't making any argument.

2. I've called exactly one person a xenophobe.

3. You're making less sense with every post. Maybe you should call it an evening. The Eagles/Bears isn't much of a game, but it's something.

I made my point hours ago. It has not waivered.

Yes, you have been committed to the same wrong-headed opinion all day. Congratulations.

Quote:Nor have you made any viable argument to convince me that gay marriage is fine or something we should allow in this country.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Quote:I'm just responding to your flailing and chaotic attempt to hang on.

Oh, is THAT what you call it?

Spare me your words of enlightenment, progress boy. I am against gay marriage and a proponent of the traditional family. Stop being so intolerant and xenophobic.

Now who's throwing in the towel?

(12-22-2013 10:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Heh, I just said your opinion was wrong, not that you weren't entitled to it.

People walk around wrong every day. You'll be fine.

You opinions are wrong and go against the stable family unit. A very poor environment to raise children.

(12-22-2013 10:29 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 10:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Heh, I just said your opinion was wrong, not that you weren't entitled to it.

People walk around wrong every day. You'll be fine.

You opinions are wrong and go against the stable family unit. A very poor environment to raise children.

You not liking my opinions doesn't make me wrong.

How is allowing people who love each other to marry going to destabilize the family unit, exactly?

(12-22-2013 06:53 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 06:23 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 06:09 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 06:06 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 05:16 PM)Smaug Wrote:  If your church is ever forced by law to perform gay weddings (and I'll believe that'll happen when I see it) ignore the invitation.

Come one man, you can't be serious. You know damn well these people will be suing Churches left and right.

Probably, but that doesn't mean they'll win.

Besides, I recognize that the right of gays to marry is going to bump up against some people's religious freedoms, and some lines will inevitably be drawn, but it's going to happen, and you're kidding yourself if you think it won't.

Oh Jesus dude. These people will have no problem finding a radical judge who is sympathetic to their wants. Notice how I said wants and not rights. The courts will give these people whatever they want - regardless of the law or if a majority opposes. We have seen that time and time again. They are a radical fringe with specially appointed judges, a media pushing their agenda in the news and entertainment industry.

I think it's time you realize the proponents of traditional marriage aren't trying to discriminate or take rights away from someone. They are trying to protect the sanctity of marriage. They are trying to protect an eroding culture that is being chipped away by radical fringe groups from all angles. Some of us still care about our traditional way of life and denying gays a union reserved for a man and a woman is not denying them a human right.

and finally, many of those who are pushing for gay marriage are not exactly a tolerant bunch. They have been downright nasty to those of us who prefer our traditional values being upheld. They have been the epitome of bigotry and intolerance as they actually assault those who oppose the notion of gay marriage.

I'm sorry that you cannot comprehend what many of us consider very important.

*sigh*

I will type this more slowly this time.

SCOTUS could throw out every ban on gay marriage in the land and it doesn't harm your or my traditional marriage one iota. Not a smidgen. Not a scintilla. Nary a jot nor tittle.

What are you REALLY afraid of?

Stop that 3rd grade argument. I already backed you in a corner and you admitted that it damn well does threaten traditional marriage and that you wanted the change.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

(12-22-2013 06:09 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 06:06 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 05:16 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 05:08 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 04:49 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  I don't know of any.

Religious exemptions can be put in, but people will have to accept the separation of church and state.

Yes. I'm sure religious exemptions will be put in if gay marriage is made a legal right. Just like religious institutions are exempted from providing contraceptives. Oh wait they aren't exempt.

Do you really think if Gay marriage is made legal nationally that GLADD and gay partners won't sue churches that won't perform gay marriages? Come on. If they'll sue a baker for not baking a cake when there were other bakers they could've taken their business too of course they'll sue churches.

If your church is ever forced by law to perform gay weddings (and I'll believe that'll happen when I see it) ignore the invitation.

Come one man, you can't be serious. You know damn well these people will be suing Churches left and right.

Probably, but that doesn't mean they'll win.

Besides, I recognize that the right of gays to marry is going to bump up against some people's religious freedoms, and some lines will inevitably be drawn, but it's going to happen, and you're kidding yourself if you think it won't.

So does it threaten traditional marriage or not? You can't talk out of both sides of your mouth.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

Circle the part where I said it threatened traditional marriage.

So, what are you really afraid of?

(12-22-2013 10:42 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 10:29 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 10:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Heh, I just said your opinion was wrong, not that you weren't entitled to it.

People walk around wrong every day. You'll be fine.

You opinions are wrong and go against the stable family unit. A very poor environment to raise children.

You not liking my opinions doesn't make me wrong.

How is allowing people who love each other to marry going to destabilize the family unit, exactly?

Ok it's over. You are officially a fag. When are you telling your wife?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

(12-22-2013 10:45 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Circle the part where I said it threatened traditional marriage.

So, what are you really afraid of?

Have you been drinking a lot of soy milk?

(12-22-2013 10:47 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 10:42 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 10:29 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(12-22-2013 10:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Heh, I just said your opinion was wrong, not that you weren't entitled to it.

People walk around wrong every day. You'll be fine.

You opinions are wrong and go against the stable family unit. A very poor environment to raise children.

You not liking my opinions doesn't make me wrong.

How is allowing people who love each other to marry going to destabilize the family unit, exactly?

Ok it's over. You are officially a fag. When are you telling your wife?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

What was that you were saying about 3rd grade responses?

(12-22-2013 10:45 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Circle the part where I said it threatened traditional marriage.

So, what are you really afraid of?

"Besides, I recognize that the right of gays to marry is going to bump up against some people's religious freedoms, and some lines will inevitably be drawn, but it's going to happen, and you're kidding yourself if you think it won't."

These are your words.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2