(12-19-2013 01:34 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:38 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:20 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  https://www.aclu.org/lgbt-rights_hiv-aid...ance-plan.

And I have to pay for your damn kids and your pregnant wife too.

Is that an expression of your "bigotry" towards people who can reproduce?

Not at all, I'm just pointing out that I have to pay for expensive medical care for people that aren't part of my family or social group. And I promise you, single employees in group health plans usually end up getting screwed as many plans are set up to subsidize those with kids or those that get pregnant. And those costs are much higher than any charges for HIV/AIDS.

Two points:

You benefit from people having kids

I challenge you on the costs of HIV/AIDS.

However, if you want to get rid of taxes for public schools, then own up and say so. I won't criticize.

I don't benefit from you having kids. In fact, it is detriment to my life.

Yes you do as those kids eventually start contributing to the tax base later in life. Need to keep popping out the kids so some folks can keep getting free stuff.

(12-19-2013 01:43 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-19-2013 01:34 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:38 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Is that an expression of your "bigotry" towards people who can reproduce?

Not at all, I'm just pointing out that I have to pay for expensive medical care for people that aren't part of my family or social group. And I promise you, single employees in group health plans usually end up getting screwed as many plans are set up to subsidize those with kids or those that get pregnant. And those costs are much higher than any charges for HIV/AIDS.

Two points:

You benefit from people having kids

I challenge you on the costs of HIV/AIDS.

However, if you want to get rid of taxes for public schools, then own up and say so. I won't criticize.

I don't benefit from you having kids. In fact, it is detriment to my life.

Yes you do as those kids eventually start contributing to the tax base later in life. Need to keep popping out the kids so some folks can keep getting free stuff.

Robert doesn't see the connection. Remember, he's never been with a woman - just a blow-up doll.

(12-19-2013 01:43 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-19-2013 01:34 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:38 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Is that an expression of your "bigotry" towards people who can reproduce?

Not at all, I'm just pointing out that I have to pay for expensive medical care for people that aren't part of my family or social group. And I promise you, single employees in group health plans usually end up getting screwed as many plans are set up to subsidize those with kids or those that get pregnant. And those costs are much higher than any charges for HIV/AIDS.

Two points:

You benefit from people having kids

I challenge you on the costs of HIV/AIDS.

However, if you want to get rid of taxes for public schools, then own up and say so. I won't criticize.

I don't benefit from you having kids. In fact, it is detriment to my life.

Yes you do as those kids eventually start contributing to the tax base later in life. .

That's a secondary effect (although probably primary in tom's view). Fact is, those kids are going to provide the goods and services tommy wants/needs in the future. They also will be the ones to defend the country, and the rights he so adamantly insists are his (w/ no explanation as to why).

Oh, and didn't someone pay taxes for him as a kid? Now he doesn't want to pay it back?

Yes, tommy is easily proven wrong for several reasons.

Meanwhile, he can't answer the question of how I benefit by paying for others' health care.

(12-19-2013 01:43 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(12-19-2013 01:34 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:38 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:25 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(12-18-2013 03:21 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Is that an expression of your "bigotry" towards people who can reproduce?

Not at all, I'm just pointing out that I have to pay for expensive medical care for people that aren't part of my family or social group. And I promise you, single employees in group health plans usually end up getting screwed as many plans are set up to subsidize those with kids or those that get pregnant. And those costs are much higher than any charges for HIV/AIDS.

Two points:

You benefit from people having kids

I challenge you on the costs of HIV/AIDS.

However, if you want to get rid of taxes for public schools, then own up and say so. I won't criticize.

I don't benefit from you having kids. In fact, it is detriment to my life.

Yes you do as those kids eventually start contributing to the tax base later in life. Need to keep popping out the kids so some folks can keep getting free stuff.

Sorry but while they MAY contribute to the tax base, they will cost the country more than they will ever pay-especially if they grow up with daddy's beliefs.