about Mitt Romney's campaign has a lot of liberal reporters admitting they intentionally wrote dishonest things to paint Romney in a bad light to put Obama as the "positive" candiate.

I'm starting to REALLY wonder what's in this documentary that's got a lot of reporters "pre-apologizing" before it comes out.

Apologizing for being deceitful liars for the sole purpose of discrediting the cracker, may go directly to their future creditability. To say nothing of their racism.

I don't see it on netflix...

The mainstream media is just a dirty politics unit of the Democratic party.

(12-19-2013 12:12 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  I don't see it on netflix...

It's not out yet UofM.. there are trailers for it coming out on the internet.

Can you link me stories of liberal news anchors saying they deliberately wrote negative things? I'm genuinely interested, I have no motive here you just really piqued my curiosity lol

(12-19-2013 12:29 AM)Ole Blue Wrote:  Can you link me stories of liberal news anchors saying they deliberately wrote negative things? I'm genuinely interested, I have no motive here you just really piqued my curiosity lol

I'll have to see if I can re-find the stories, Blue.. (Feedly has a habit of erasing links once I've read them).

this is the first one I found

I know there were a couple of others I read.... Now if i can just remember where they were.

(12-19-2013 12:32 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  I'll have to see if I can re-find the stories, Blue.. (Feedly has a habit of erasing links once I've read them).

this is the first one I found

I know there were a couple of others I read.... Now if i can just remember where they were.

The link you posted says nothing about him deliberately writing dishonest things. Not saying it didn't happen, but your example doesn't back up your case.

Is there a part in this documentary where the reporters force Romney to make the " 47%" comment?

(12-19-2013 11:20 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Is there a part in this documentary where the reporters force Romney to make the " 47%" comment?

What is sad is that, his comment about 47% not voting for him no matter what was probably his honest assessment of the voting electorate....... and while the percentage might be a little off - probably fairly accurate.

For any "R" or "D" candidate, there is around 40% that would vote for a dead cat if it had the "correct" letter in front of the name. The billions of $ spent on garnering office is all spent on the 20% in-flux.

I guess I just find it ironic that part of what sunk a campaign was a relatively "honest" comment by a candidate.

Moral of the story - just tell more lies.

(12-19-2013 01:58 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(12-19-2013 11:20 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Is there a part in this documentary where the reporters force Romney to make the " 47%" comment?

What is sad is that, his comment about 47% not voting for him no matter what was probably his honest assessment of the voting electorate....... and while the percentage might be a little off - probably fairly accurate.

For any "R" or "D" candidate, there is around 40% that would vote for a dead cat if it had the "correct" letter in front of the name. The billions of $ spent on garnering office is all spent on the 20% in-flux.

I guess I just find it ironic that part of what sunk a campaign was a relatively "honest" comment by a candidate.

Moral of the story - just tell more lies.

If he would have said 40-something% will vote for Obama because they are Democrat it would not have been a big deal. But he said that 47% of the US population are deadbeats. Hard to see the man in a good light after that.

(12-19-2013 01:58 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(12-19-2013 11:20 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Is there a part in this documentary where the reporters force Romney to make the " 47%" comment?

What is sad is that, his comment about 47% not voting for him no matter what was probably his honest assessment of the voting electorate....... and while the percentage might be a little off - probably fairly accurate.

For any "R" or "D" candidate, there is around 40% that would vote for a dead cat if it had the "correct" letter in front of the name. The billions of $ spent on garnering office is all spent on the 20% in-flux.

I guess I just find it ironic that part of what sunk a campaign was a relatively "honest" comment by a candidate.

Moral of the story - just tell more lies.

That's partially true, but like EpicNiner said, he added the caveat that they are the people with their hands out to the government. Not some of them either.

(12-19-2013 01:58 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(12-19-2013 11:20 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Is there a part in this documentary where the reporters force Romney to make the " 47%" comment?

What is sad is that, his comment about 47% not voting for him no matter what was probably his honest assessment of the voting electorate....... and while the percentage might be a little off - probably fairly accurate.

For any "R" or "D" candidate, there is around 40% that would vote for a dead cat if it had the "correct" letter in front of the name. The billions of $ spent on garnering office is all spent on the 20% in-flux.

I guess I just find it ironic that part of what sunk a campaign was a relatively "honest" comment by a candidate.

Moral of the story - just tell more lies.

You are correct except that I think you are missing the context of what he said about the "47%" and why they won't vote for him.

(12-19-2013 02:09 PM)EpicNiner Wrote:  

(12-19-2013 01:58 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(12-19-2013 11:20 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Is there a part in this documentary where the reporters force Romney to make the " 47%" comment?

What is sad is that, his comment about 47% not voting for him no matter what was probably his honest assessment of the voting electorate....... and while the percentage might be a little off - probably fairly accurate.

For any "R" or "D" candidate, there is around 40% that would vote for a dead cat if it had the "correct" letter in front of the name. The billions of $ spent on garnering office is all spent on the 20% in-flux.

I guess I just find it ironic that part of what sunk a campaign was a relatively "honest" comment by a candidate.

Moral of the story - just tell more lies.

If he would have said 40-something% will vote for Obama because they are Democrat it would not have been a big deal. But he said that 47% of the US population are deadbeats. Hard to see the man in a good light after that.

The only people who would agree with you are the 47%. Meanwhile, Obama portrayed successful companies that provide jobs for millions of people as the bad guys, and he'll do it again when he blames insurance companies for the problems with Obamacare. The left even blamed Romney for letting someone's wife die, oh, and he bullied a kid in high school.