(12-16-2013 02:22 PM)OneShiningMoment Wrote:  

(12-16-2013 02:10 PM)Cletus Wrote:  It certainly wasn't the worst officiated game I've seen in the last 4-5 seasons.

It was inconsistent; but not wildly so.

The increased emphasis on not allowing the defender to use his forearm should also apply to the offensive player.

Which doesn't seem to be a point of emphasis so far as guards are actively pushing/shielding with it.

I always thought a player leaving his feet to dunk and is fouled in the act of doing so has the right to grab the goal/net to avoid injury & protect himself.

So I didn't agree with the call on that.

Also I thought that the rule had changed the last few years where a player could not longer call a time out when a ball is loose on the floor and he dives and grabs it to keep it from going out of bounds and calls a time out?

That occurred on the sidelines during Fridays night game and was allowed.

Did I imagine that rule being changed?

I'm waiting on homefry to comment on the rules. To have a dog that knows advanced calculus is mind boggling!!!

Not really; I have two dogs who are so good at advanced calculus they tutor high school students.

(12-16-2013 02:30 PM)TigerBill Wrote:  

(12-16-2013 02:22 PM)OneShiningMoment Wrote:  

(12-16-2013 02:10 PM)Cletus Wrote:  It certainly wasn't the worst officiated game I've seen in the last 4-5 seasons.

It was inconsistent; but not wildly so.

The increased emphasis on not allowing the defender to use his forearm should also apply to the offensive player.

Which doesn't seem to be a point of emphasis so far as guards are actively pushing/shielding with it.

I always thought a player leaving his feet to dunk and is fouled in the act of doing so has the right to grab the goal/net to avoid injury & protect himself.

So I didn't agree with the call on that.

Also I thought that the rule had changed the last few years where a player could not longer call a time out when a ball is loose on the floor and he dives and grabs it to keep it from going out of bounds and calls a time out?

That occurred on the sidelines during Fridays night game and was allowed.

Did I imagine that rule being changed?

I'm waiting on homefry to comment on the rules. To have a dog that knows advanced calculus is mind boggling!!!

Not really; I have two dogs who are so good at advanced calculus they tutor high school students.

maybe you can get them to tutor my nephew

Calc I, Calc II., Calc III, Differential Equations (Diff EQ) and then Linear Algebra. I own your dogs and I want to fight your dogs.

(12-16-2013 01:30 PM)homefry20 Wrote:  

(12-16-2013 01:24 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(12-16-2013 01:19 PM)homefry20 Wrote:  

(12-16-2013 01:09 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(12-16-2013 12:47 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Fix is the wrong word for it. It was a bad day for two very good officials last year at the Louisville game. John Cahill went on to officiate the national title game last year so he must have been pretty good during the year. I don't think Stuart reffed the Final Four last year.

Stuart...a Vol, ****** us. We can assume that his final grade wasn't affected because he fixed one game; or maybe it was.

It's absolutely ridiculous to think any of that.

After reading your nonsense in this thread; I couldn't be happier that you disagree with me. It was worse than professional wrestling. The only thing Stuart didn't do was hit any of our players over the head with a chair.

I forgot you were the expert of all experts. You know less about officiating than my dog knows about advanced calculus.

If you said diapers and bedpans you would be right.

(12-16-2013 10:49 PM)OneShiningMoment Wrote:  

(12-16-2013 02:30 PM)TigerBill Wrote:  

(12-16-2013 02:22 PM)OneShiningMoment Wrote:  

(12-16-2013 02:10 PM)Cletus Wrote:  It certainly wasn't the worst officiated game I've seen in the last 4-5 seasons.

It was inconsistent; but not wildly so.

The increased emphasis on not allowing the defender to use his forearm should also apply to the offensive player.

Which doesn't seem to be a point of emphasis so far as guards are actively pushing/shielding with it.

I always thought a player leaving his feet to dunk and is fouled in the act of doing so has the right to grab the goal/net to avoid injury & protect himself.

So I didn't agree with the call on that.

Also I thought that the rule had changed the last few years where a player could not longer call a time out when a ball is loose on the floor and he dives and grabs it to keep it from going out of bounds and calls a time out?

That occurred on the sidelines during Fridays night game and was allowed.

Did I imagine that rule being changed?

I'm waiting on homefry to comment on the rules. To have a dog that knows advanced calculus is mind boggling!!!

Not really; I have two dogs who are so good at advanced calculus they tutor high school students.

maybe you can get them to tutor my nephew

Can do, and they work cheap, just throw them a bone.

(12-15-2013 07:09 PM)bluebacker Wrote:  Louisville was simply allowed to rape and pillage their way to a national title last year. Anyone not a Louisville fan will agree to this; even Louisville fans know it but will not admit it.

FSU was allowed to rape its way to a Heisman trophy this year

(12-13-2013 10:42 PM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(12-13-2013 09:56 PM)homefry20 Wrote:  I'm sure I do, but I doubt they're the ones taking stupid shots and not defending the 3

I wanna fight you so bad.

This is literally one of the funniest things I've ever seen on this forum!


I don't like what someone says and now, "I wanna fight you so bad."
That. Is. Fantastic.

(12-17-2013 12:56 PM)Willie Becton Wrote:  

(12-13-2013 10:42 PM)Tigermaniac Wrote:  

(12-13-2013 09:56 PM)homefry20 Wrote:  I'm sure I do, but I doubt they're the ones taking stupid shots and not defending the 3

I wanna fight you so bad.

This is literally one of the funniest things I've ever seen on this forum!


I don't like what someone says and now, "I wanna fight you so bad."
That. Is. Fantastic.

:)