Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Throttled by Stony Brook
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Hart Foundation Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,953
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 107
I Root For: James Madison
Location: Bad News, Va
Post: #1
Throttled by Stony Brook
Well now we know that JMU doesn't deserve to make the playoffs this year and the wheels fell off tonight. I'm thinking hard and I can't remember a game where a Mickey Matthews defense was so bad against a poor offense. There have been some good offenses over the years that have gotten the best of Mickey's scheme, but Stony Brook has a poor offense. They came into the game ranked 8th out of 10 in CAA passing offense at 190 ypg. Their QB had completed only 56% of his passes with the same number of TD's (9) as INT's (9).
He looked like an All-American tonight against the Dukes.

This is the first game all year that JMU was favored and ended up losing and it was a punch in the neck. Stony Brook took it to the Dukes repeatedly without any luck or fluke plays in the mix. They flat out beat the Dukes with better offense and a couple of turnovers on defense.

To make this season a success, the Dukes needed to win all the games they would be favored in and pull 2 upsets.
They pulled one upset as a home dog against Villanova and would have had a meaningful game next week if they didn't tank tonight.
This one hurts a little more since it was a home game, but there were other opportunities to pull some road upsets that this team just couldn't find a way to get it done.
1-road loss to favorite Akron.
2-road loss to favorite Delaware
3-road loss to favorite W&M
4-road loss to favorite New Hampshire
The Dukes had their chances.

I think the team had enough players to cover for the growing pains of Birdsong at QB, but they didn't do it on the field and results are the only thing that matters. A defense that has been the calling card of Mickey Matthews' teams did not keep its end of the bargain.
Now that the Dukes are eliminated from the playoffs, we can get into the juicy debates of should he stay or should he go.
11-16-2013 09:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Mad victory Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,096
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 21
I Root For: James Madison
Location: mossy creek va
Post: #2
RE: Throttled by Stony Brook
2003 last time we gave up 40 to an fcs team
11-16-2013 09:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JMU2004 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,789
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 114
I Root For: DUKES
Location: the Commonwealth
Post: #3
RE: Throttled by Stony Brook
It was a butt whooping....by Stony Brook. Think back to 2008...did you EVER think it would come to this?

It was embarrassing on so many levels. What a waste of momentum.

BTW, I don't think Matthews will be fired.
11-16-2013 10:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


dlive54 Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 155
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 1
I Root For: JMU
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Throttled by Stony Brook
Absolutely sucks to not make the playoffs on a consistent basis. We will have to wait minimum of another year to see if Bridgeforth can host a playoff game. The accountants running our athletic department have to be going nuts at all the potential lost revenue we have missed by not hosting a playoff game in the expanded Bridgeforth.
11-16-2013 10:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
arlingtonduke Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 238
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 0
I Root For: JMU DUkes
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Throttled by Stony Brook
Was it just me, or did it look like Stony Brook was bigger, more talented than us all around? I have always felt that we had more talent and coaching is what held us back, but it looked like we were lacking in both areas tonight.
(This post was last modified: 11-16-2013 10:24 PM by arlingtonduke.)
11-16-2013 10:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JMU2004 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,789
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 114
I Root For: DUKES
Location: the Commonwealth
Post: #6
RE: Throttled by Stony Brook
(11-16-2013 10:23 PM)arlingtonduke Wrote:  Was it just me, or did it look like Stony Brook was bigger, more talented than us all around? I have always felt that we had more talent and coaching is what held us back.

SBU was bigger across the roster. It's scary what they must have had when healthy......yea, SBU was missing a TON of starters due to injury.
11-16-2013 10:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.