Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Future Conference Realignment
Author Message
jaminandjachin Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,199
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 56
I Root For: UNC
Location:
Post: #41
RE: Future Conference Realignment
UCONN would have to bring something else to the table besides the Hartford market. Basketball is very good, but football is horrible. Networks aren't willing to pay for them.
11-11-2013 03:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UConn-SMU Offline
often wrong, never in doubt
*

Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
Post: #42
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 03:27 PM)jaminandjachin Wrote:  UCONN would have to bring something else to the table besides the Hartford market. Basketball is very good, but football is horrible. Networks aren't willing to pay for them.

Hartford/New Haven is the #30 market. UConn also has part of the NYC market ... Connecticut is part of the "tri-state" area.

Although football on the field is horrible now, all they have to do is reach .500 again (to become a bowl team) for them to sell out their 40,000 seat stadium.
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2013 07:12 PM by UConn-SMU.)
11-11-2013 07:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
john01992 Offline
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode

Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
Post: #43
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 03:21 PM)GO Coogs GO!!! Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 10:18 AM)john01992 Wrote:  personally, i think 14 is the magic number not 16. i think OU/TX to the pac12 is the ultimate end result.

the remaining b8 schools have some options

1. stay at 8 and form a best of the rest power conference

2. get to 14 by poaching the best FB schools from the mwc, aac or add a combination of both

3. try to rebuild into a future power conference. the best schools to do that IMO. CSU, new mexico, BYU, usf, ucf, cincy

03-lmfao

I know I am a homer but come on if the B12 loses OU and UT after losing A&M do you really think they won't look at us? Do you honestly think they are just going to give up on southeast Texas.

Yes yes Baylor, Tech, and TCU carry alot of weight in the state but losing both UT and A&M is sending up the white flag on southeast Texas to the SEC without at least considering us.

New Mexico? Colorado State? Yes basketball is important but unless you are a Memphis level program it won't get you in. I could see them looking at Memphis before both of those schools. All this mess has and always will be about football.

i considered it TBH however i thought they would go after new states & new markets. plus theres the whole "too many texas schools" mentality that will always follow this conference
11-11-2013 07:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Minutemen429 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 865
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 37
I Root For: UMass
Location:
Post: #44
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 01:53 PM)CardFan1 Wrote:  Never been there but from TV, UConns Stadium looks very good. Shouldn't be any problem only 22 miles away. Hell the Patriots play about 70 miles from Boston. No problems there.

Gillette Stadium is about 25 miles from downtown Boston. It's probably only 15 miles from certain neighborhoods in souther Boston. Gillette is about 90 miles from UMass though
11-11-2013 07:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jml2010 Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,282
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: Tx Tech & UNT
Location: Oklahoma
Post: #45
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 01:48 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:46 PM)jml2010 Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:37 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Texas will ditch Tech in a heartbeat.

Keep dreaming. It has been reported numerous times that Texas will not leave Tech.

If Texas wanted to get rid of Tech, they would have already done it like they did to SMU, Rice and Houston. They haven't but don't let your ignorance get in the way of facts.

If Texas has to make a choice between the Pac12 and Tech you honestly think they'd hold on to a substandard program like Tech?

Substandard program like Tech. LOL The same school that gave Alabama everything the Tide could handle in the 06 Cotton Bowl? The same substandard program that lost on a lame duck FG as time expired?

One thing we know for sure, your directional Alma Materl in Louisiana will never be a part of the big boy club.

Outside of UTexas( A&M is not in this discussion because they found a home), we have something no other school in this state or the western part of the United States has, TV sets in a state with 26 million people.

Lastly, Larry Scott has already been to Lubbock and he had the blessing of the PAC 10 presidents when he issued us an invite.( Yes, I know it was contingent on UT but he damn sure didn't invite Ula la, houston, smu or rice).

Please educate yourself because you look like an ignorant fool.
11-11-2013 08:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nzmorange Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,000
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 279
I Root For: UAB
Location:
Post: #46
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 10:57 AM)Hank Schrader Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 10:19 AM)john01992 Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 09:48 AM)Wolfman Wrote:  Big meetings in January. Already some warning shots fired. It could happen then or it might take a year or two.

I don't see WV in the ACC. Plenty of hard feelings on both sides.

I don't see Uconn in the ACC. They didn't have the support prior to last expansion and the new additions don't seem too thrilled about them either.

this^^^^^^^

SU, & LV would most likely be the biggest opponents of their inclusion

And why would Louisville oppose UConn?

It's obvious Syracuse's administration is cowarding to Northeast competition as it watched UConn football and basketball surpass it while in the Big East together, but Louisville opposition makes literally no sense.

Win a game before you talk smack.
11-11-2013 08:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nzmorange Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,000
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 279
I Root For: UAB
Location:
Post: #47
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 11:34 AM)IceJus10 Wrote:  Just curious, but what facilities at UConn are bad?

Well, the football stadium is over 20 miles from campus and built on a toxic land fill for starters.
11-11-2013 08:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jml2010 Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,282
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: Tx Tech & UNT
Location: Oklahoma
Post: #48
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 01:55 PM)Hank Schrader Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:48 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:46 PM)jml2010 Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:37 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Texas will ditch Tech in a heartbeat.

Keep dreaming. It has been reported numerous times that Texas will not leave Tech.

If Texas wanted to get rid of Tech, they would have already done it like they did to SMU, Rice and Houston. They haven't but don't let your ignorance get in the way of facts.

If Texas has to make a choice between the Pac12 and Tech you honestly think they'd hold on to a substandard program like Tech?

I'm with you, especially if A&M continues its success in the SEC. No way politicians will allow Tech to drag the Longhorns down to second in its own state. If the choice is made for Texas to move West I do not see Tech having the political pull to derail the move this time.

Of course the easier option would always be to bring them with them if the Pac was willing to bring Tech in to get UT.

Texas will never be 2nd in this state. Texas is the top dog and was a little down when A&M caught lightning in a bottle. Once autogrtaph and Sumlin leave, A&M will go back to their mediocre ways. Just look at their history, with a few exceptions, the only time they are relevant is when they cheat.

A&M will NEVER join the PAC. They would stick out like a sore thumb among the Cali faithful.
11-11-2013 08:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HeartOfDixie Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 24,689
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 945
I Root For: Alabama
Location: Huntsville AL
Post: #49
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 08:27 PM)jml2010 Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:48 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:46 PM)jml2010 Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:37 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Texas will ditch Tech in a heartbeat.

Keep dreaming. It has been reported numerous times that Texas will not leave Tech.

If Texas wanted to get rid of Tech, they would have already done it like they did to SMU, Rice and Houston. They haven't but don't let your ignorance get in the way of facts.

If Texas has to make a choice between the Pac12 and Tech you honestly think they'd hold on to a substandard program like Tech?

Substandard program like Tech. LOL The same school that gave Alabama everything the Tide could handle in the 06 Cotton Bowl? The same substandard program that lost on a lame duck FG as time expired?

One thing we know for sure, your directional Alma Materl in Louisiana will never be a part of the big boy club.

Outside of UTexas( A&M is not in this discussion because they found a home), we have something no other school in this state or the western part of the United States has, TV sets in a state with 26 million people.

Lastly, Larry Scott has already been to Lubbock and he had the blessing of the PAC 10 presidents when he issued us an invite.( Yes, I know it was contingent on UT but he damn sure didn't invite Ula la, houston, smu or rice).

Please educate yourself because you look like an ignorant fool.

The truth struck a nerve huh?

Don't be upset that Tech is irrelevant and could very easily end up out in the cold.

It's just a fact, Tech has more in common with the higher end G5 schools than it does a lot of P5 folks. Besides, the absolute only reason Tech is mentioned is because it has a pretty bigger sister. Tech itself would get zero interest.
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2013 08:51 PM by HeartOfDixie.)
11-11-2013 08:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ned Low Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,053
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 179
I Root For: ECU
Location: Durham, NC
Post: #50
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 11:45 AM)Wilkie01 Wrote:  Ok, I will play :

Big 10 adds Kansas and Virginia to reach 16.

PAC 12 adds Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State to reach 16.

SEC adds West Virginia and Kansas State to reach 16.

ACC adds Connecticut, Cincinnati and Navy (football only) to reach 16.

The Big 12 three (3) left overs are Iowa State, TCU and Baylor. The American nine (9) left overs are Temple, East Carolina, Memphis, South Florida, Central Florida, Tulane, SMU, Houston and Tulsa. I suspect the American absorbs Iowa State, TCU and Baylor. Then raids the MWC for San Diego State, Fresno, Boise and Colorado State, also. American 16 will look like this:

1) Temple
2) East Carolina
3) Memphis
4) Central Florida
5) South Florida
6)Tulane
7) Iowa State
8) Tulsa
9) TCU
10) Baylor
11) SMU
12) Houston
13) Colorado State
14) Boise State
15) Fresno State
16) San Diego State

Now the American has become the 5th Power Conference , while the Big 12 has been dissolved.

The only un answered question is do the Sun Belt, CUSA, MAC and the MWC go to 16 teams, if they do which one of these 4 dies?

07-coffee3

I could certainly live with that... in fact, I would be thrilled.

I'm not so sure that any more movement will take place. I can almost guarantee that UVA is not going anywhere without UNC and to a degree, Duke. I'm also willing to bet that they would have a hard time getting away from VPI. The SEC and the B10 may be stuck, although I do think that GT might be willing to bolt to the B10 IF they can have a travel partner.

I'm not sold on the idea that the B12 has the power or the desire to expand just to have a title game and from what I can tell, OK seems to side with TX on issues like these... and TX does not want to expand.

If anything happens, it will start with the PAC12. If they were smart, they would nab not two, not four but SIX B12 schools, with those schools being:

KSU
KU
TX
TX Tech
OK
OK State

No matter what, ISU, TCU and Baylor are the odd folks out. If they are cast aside, they'll come to the American. I don't know what to think about WVU, although they could go to the ACC I suppose (doubtful).

If ND joins the ACC for all sports, I would think that Cinci would be at the top of the ACC's list, followed by UConn.
11-11-2013 08:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
lumberpack4 Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,336
Joined: Jun 2013
I Root For: ACC
Location:
Post: #51
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 03:20 PM)Hank Schrader Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 02:37 PM)lumberpack4 Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 11:45 AM)Wilkie01 Wrote:  Ok, I will play :

Big 10 adds Kansas and Virginia to reach 16.

PAC 12 adds Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State to reach 16.

SEC adds West Virginia and Kansas State to reach 16.

ACC adds Connecticut, Cincinnati and Navy (football only) to reach 16.

The Big 12 three (3) left overs are Iowa State, TCU and Baylor. The American nine (9) left overs are Temple, East Carolina, Memphis, South Florida, Central Florida, Tulane, SMU, Houston and Tulsa. I suspect the American absorbs Iowa State, TCU and Baylor. Then raids the MWC for San Diego State, Fresno, Boise and Colorado State, also. American 16 will look like this:

1) Temple
2) East Carolina
3) Memphis
4) Central Florida
5) South Florida
6)Tulane
7) Iowa State
8) Tulsa
9) TCU
10) Baylor
11) SMU
12) Houston
13) Colorado State
14) Boise State
15) Fresno State
16) San Diego State

Now the American has become the 5th Power Conference , while the Big 12 has been dissolved.

The only un answered question is do the Sun Belt, CUSA, MAC and the MWC go to 16 teams, if they do which one of these 4 dies?

07-coffee3

The ACC has 15 teams, if three teams are added that makes 18. Why would the ACC add UConn and Cincy instead of just adding Navy as a football only match to ND?

Remember, anytime you talk about adding UConn, BC is a vote against them and FSU and Clemson do not want them for football purposes. It only takes 4 votes to get blackballed. Also the ACC doesn't add a market with UConn - BC, Syracuse, ND, and Duke interest overlaps the UConn media market, and Louisville and ND and especially Kentucky and Ohio State overlap into the Cincy market.

I've indicated before the ACC is more likely to add Iowa State than UConn - well there is a reason for that - Iowa State adds marketfoot print. The only expansion inside the current ACC footprint that could get 12 votes are Penn State, Florida, Georgia, and Navy, if by adding Navy ND played at least 8 conference football games.

You keep saying there is media overlap with adding UConn and ignore the fact that according to the 2013-2014 rankings Hartford's DMA 30th largest DMA in the nation.

The ACC also has a giant hole surrounding NYC, with Boston College being the closest team to it. A UConn addition gets the ACC fans directly in the NYC DMA with UConn's Fairfield County fans. What good is having "overlapping" Duke, Cuse, ND and BC (i strongly question this one) in NYC if the closest those fans have to see there team play on a regular basis is actually Boston.

With that being said, the ACC still will never invite UConn, but your reasoning has some flaws.

I think you are viewing the markets as a zero-sum game. A media market is not a zero sum game. No one team holds an entire market - there are far too many hours of programing to fill and the question becomes one of draw - who is the first, second, third, fourth draw in the market as in most markets, 1-4 gets you seen.

What's on TV related to sports, especially football, is generally the same in NYC markets and Boston markets at the same time.

Meaning, what ESPN, ABC, CBS, FOX or NBC carries in the Northeast is usually the same game. Sometimes it's different but if you look at most ABC/ESPN maps you will see that it's not usually different in the Northeast.

The Hartford donut is fully surrounded by Boston, Providence, NYC, and Albany markets. It's not about fans coming to a game, it's about who will watch and put eyes on the TV set. When it comes to football and basketball, the ACC covers it's interests with BC, ND, and Syracuse, and Duke in basketball.

Nearly every ACC game is televised everywhere. How often is UConn the only team on TV in the Hartford DMA? Think about what a small percentage of time that makes up of the total college football and basketball television schedule.

The ACC does not need UConn or a team in the Hartford DMA to be seen on TV in the Hartford DMA, that already happens. It's a donut hole that is barely a hole for the ACC.

Take into consideration the vast number of hours available for programing. 24 or so hours a week to fill for college football, 40 or so a week for college basketball. One football teams fills 3.5 hours. One basketball team fills at most 6 hours. You don't have to have the top draw in the particular DMA to be seen in the DMA. You don't even need the second top draw. Third or better is nice.

This is the main reason the ACC accepted Louisville a fresh large market for the ACC - the same reason the B10 looked at Maryland.

When you compare the Louisville media footprint to the UConn footprint you get the following:

Louisville adds the entire state of Kentucky to the ACC's media footprint even if that niche is just the second favorite team in the markets. Louisville also adds southside Indiana in the Louisville media area.

Louisville is a media draw in Cincinicatti after Ohio State, Cincy and KY all of that area was new and fresh for the ACC. This is about 5 million people. Hartford's DMA only has about 2.7 million folks. That does not mean that UConn is popular with just the 2.7 million, but outside that region, the ACC has coverage with other schools.

As to the ACC having a donut hole over NYC, that's not accurate - I think that's akin to saying the B10 is not seen in NYC because Penn State is located in PA or that Rutgers is somehow the only college team that is seen in NYC. A donut hole implies lack of access or control of the access by your rival.

The ACC covers NYC just fine with ND, Syracuse, and Duke in basketball and the games are on TV.

A college football watcher can watch 5-6 separate games each week. That takes 10-12 teams to fill those spots.

Once your conference has a hook in the marketplace, you don't need another team in the same marketplace more than you need another team in another marketplace.

Let's look at it this way in NYC you can get a college football game on CBS, NBC, ESPN, and ABC. This is upwards of 8-10 games a week. This means 16-20 teams are involved. In the NYC market the popularity of college teams probably goes something like this:

1. ND
2. Penn State
3. Ohio State
4. Rutgers
5. Syracuse
6. UConn
7. Pitt
8. BC
9. Whoever is number one at the time
10. Whomever else
11.-20 someone needs to fill these spots.

If there are 8-10 games offered on 4 networks how many times that week can ND or Penn State play? Once. Just once.

14-18 more teams must take up the slack.

Perhaps the better question is when will ND, PSU, OSU, Rutgers, Syracuse, Pitt, and BC NOT be seen in NYC during the year? What alignment of the planets would actually keep them off ABC, ESPN, ESPN 2, CBS, NBC, and whatever local broadcast package prevails like YES?

My point was that UConn's geography is poor for the ACC as it relates to BC and Syracuse since BC and Syracuse, in conjunction with ND, give the ACC all the physical footprint the ACC needs in the Northeastern US markets. If the ACC is to expand and that expansion is anyone other than Penn State, or Navy triggering ND to increase its conference slate, that expansion will come west of the current footprint in fresh media markets. Unless of course Florida or Georgia decide for some reason they want to join the ACC.
11-11-2013 09:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
lumberpack4 Offline
Banned

Posts: 4,336
Joined: Jun 2013
I Root For: ACC
Location:
Post: #52
RE: Future Conference Realignment
Ned - there are not 12 votes in the ACC to add UConn. The ACC will not expand inside it's current footprint with the exception of Penn State, Georgia, Florida, and possibly Navy. BC, FSU, Clemson, and GT will not vote to add UConn. Cincinnati's chances of getting into the ACC are greatly diminished by the addition of Louisville. Cincy is squeezed by tight marketplace that pits them against B-5 teams schools like Ohio State, Kentucky, Louisville, Indiana, Purdue, and ND. That's a lot of competition and in addition to that Cincy must compete directly with the Reds and the Bengals. While the ACC is perfectly fine to have the third favorite in a large new marketplace, I don't think the prospect of adding the 5th favorite in a small market will fly. Now, if Louisville had been taken by the B12, Cincy would have a better chance at the ACC.

Because of these geographic quirks and the rewards of adding new markets, less obvious schools like Iowa State, Kansas State, Baylor, Tulane, etc., have more potential value to the ACC than adding another school inside the existing footprint, unless that inside the footprint school is a grade A football power.
11-11-2013 09:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UConn-SMU Offline
often wrong, never in doubt
*

Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
Post: #53
RE: Future Conference Realignment
The people of Connecticut don't give a rat's ass about the ACC (BC, Syracuse, Pitt, etc.).

I don't think the ACC will ever take UConn, but don't expect viewers in NYC or Connecticut to check their TV Guides for the next ACC game. That will never happen.
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2013 09:54 PM by UConn-SMU.)
11-11-2013 09:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CintiFan Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 386
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 45
I Root For: Ohio St./ Cinti
Location:
Post: #54
RE: Future Conference Realignment
Lumberpack, you're guess on the NY market isn't too bad. An NYT article about 2 years ago has Rutgers on top with 20.9% of the NY market (which helps explain why they are now in the BIG), followed by ND at 9.2%, and Penn State with 6.4%. UConn is fourth at 5.2% followed by Michigan and Syracuse. Miami FL, Ohio State, Army and Boston College round out the top 10.

I think Cincinnati would be a good addition to the ACC. It does open up a new market, but a relatively small one. They would be a good rival for Louisvillle. When the Bearcats are not doing well, the town follows Xavier, but there are a lot of Kentucky fans too - not so much for Louisville.

Financially, UConn would make sense. Any talk of the ACC going west for Iowa State or any other Big 12 team is ridiculous.

http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09...haos/?_r=0
11-11-2013 09:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Minutemen429 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 865
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 37
I Root For: UMass
Location:
Post: #55
RE: Future Conference Realignment
If the ACC is serious about starting an ACC network the is a 0% chance it gets picked up in Connecticut because of Cuse, BC, Duke and ND. I doubt Louisville would get it on in Cincinnati either.
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2013 10:01 PM by Minutemen429.)
11-11-2013 10:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jml2010 Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,282
Joined: Jan 2011
I Root For: Tx Tech & UNT
Location: Oklahoma
Post: #56
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 08:38 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 08:27 PM)jml2010 Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:48 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:46 PM)jml2010 Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 01:37 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Texas will ditch Tech in a heartbeat.

Keep dreaming. It has been reported numerous times that Texas will not leave Tech.

If Texas wanted to get rid of Tech, they would have already done it like they did to SMU, Rice and Houston. They haven't but don't let your ignorance get in the way of facts.

If Texas has to make a choice between the Pac12 and Tech you honestly think they'd hold on to a substandard program like Tech?

Substandard program like Tech. LOL The same school that gave Alabama everything the Tide could handle in the 06 Cotton Bowl? The same substandard program that lost on a lame duck FG as time expired?

One thing we know for sure, your directional Alma Materl in Louisiana will never be a part of the big boy club.

Outside of UTexas( A&M is not in this discussion because they found a home), we have something no other school in this state or the western part of the United States has, TV sets in a state with 26 million people.

Lastly, Larry Scott has already been to Lubbock and he had the blessing of the PAC 10 presidents when he issued us an invite.( Yes, I know it was contingent on UT but he damn sure didn't invite Ula la, houston, smu or rice).

Please educate yourself because you look like an ignorant fool.

The truth struck a nerve huh?

Don't be upset that Tech is irrelevant and could very easily end up out in the cold.

It's just a fact, Tech has more in common with the higher end G5 schools than it does a lot of P5 folks. Besides, the absolute only reason Tech is mentioned is because it has a pretty bigger sister. Tech itself would get zero interest.

Go check the TV ratings from the Houston Chronicle the last 2 weeks. 3rd highest rated game 10.31.2013-11.02.2013
11.02.2013 Miami-FSU ABC 4.2
11.02.2013 UTEP-Tx A&M ESPN 2 3.8
11.02.2013 Okla St-Tx Tech FOX 2.6

4th highest rated game from 11.7.2013-11.09.2013.
11.09.2013 Miss St-Tx A&M CBS 7.5
11.09.2013 LSU-Alabama CBS 7.5
11.09.2013 Texas-WVU FOX 3.2
11.09.2013 K-State-Tx Tech ABC 2.5

PAC 12 ratings are abysmal in Houston which is the numero uno reason why the PAC will take Tech. We have the ability to deliver TV sets in state with 26 million people. That little ole irrelevant school in West Texas beat out power schools like Notre Dame, Michigan, Clemson and Southern California.

Hey but whatever helps you sleep at night. Have fun thinking Tech is irrelevant. The TV execs obviously have a different opinion.
11-11-2013 10:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
whitey Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,763
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 71
I Root For: a playoff
Location:
Post: #57
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 12:21 PM)HartfordHusky Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 11:55 AM)john01992 Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 11:51 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 11:48 AM)john01992 Wrote:  
(11-11-2013 11:34 AM)IceJus10 Wrote:  Just curious, but what facilities at UConn are bad?

1. their FB stadium being 22 miles being off campus

2. their FB stadium being only 40k

What the hell is your problem? The off-campus stadium is only an issue for you. UConn's students, alumni, and fans have no problem with it. But you bring it up two or three times per week.

Maybe you should just avoid posting about UConn and post about something you know.

yeah and the 40k capacity isnt an issue either?

That could be changed almost immediately if we get invited to the P5. We'd be at 50-55k with no problem whatsoever.

Anyone can expand but can you fill them
11-11-2013 10:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TexanMark Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,698
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1331
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Post: #58
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 11:48 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  UConn's facilities are among the best in FBS. The training centers for BB and FB are top-notch.

There is nothing second class about UConn's athletics, academics, or facilities ... except for the current play of the FB team.

I wish people would do a little research before posting.

The XL center is a dump. Your on campus arena is tiny. The Football stadium is located nowhere near the Students but it is set up quite nicely for tailgating. Trust me UConn has some liabilities with facilities.
11-11-2013 10:11 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TexanMark Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,698
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1331
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Post: #59
RE: Future Conference Realignment
(11-11-2013 01:53 PM)CardFan1 Wrote:  Never been there but from TV, UConns Stadium looks very good. Shouldn't be any problem only 22 miles away. Hell the Patriots play about 70 miles from Boston. No problems there.

It is a nice stadium...but being 22 miles from the students and located at an old airfield gives it a vibe you're definitely not at a college game. Tailgating is first rate but it feels more like a small NFL stadium than a college stadium.
11-11-2013 10:23 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Minutemen429 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 865
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 37
I Root For: UMass
Location:
Post: #60
RE: Future Conference Realignment
I thought UConn just built new football and basketball practice facilities
11-11-2013 10:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.