(10-16-2013 11:13 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  Once the Playboy stuff was found it it could create a undercurrent of gossip around the school and might be disruptive.

That said if she completed her degree, she behaves and dresses appropriately for the teaching profession, and has had good reviews, she shouldn't have been fired for something she did in the past.

I agree.

Hate it for those women that "strip" through college to afford tuition. I bet that comes back to bite them more times than not.

Teaching as a second career choice.

I'd be a bit uncomfortable if I found out my Doctor
became an MD after failing in the porn industry.

(10-16-2013 11:32 AM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 11:07 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 11:04 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 11:03 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 11:02 AM)VA49er Wrote:  True, but that doesn't prevent the fired person from filing a wrongful termination suit, does it?

Yup.

You'd have to show some kind of tort to come back at them.

What about EEOC stuff?

That would depend on wether or not you are asserting a violation of Federal employment law.

If you are in a state where you have employment at will legislation you have no recourse, Federal or State, if you are fired because your boss doesn't like your hair or just flat doesn't like you, or is worried your history in pornography reflects poorly on the institution.

The at-will laws probably wouldn't have protected the district if they used it fire a transgender or a lousy teacher.

Only if the state listed transgendered in their protected groups.

(10-16-2013 10:27 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  Nothing new here, people have been fired for being porn stars in the past.

Yep. I know this all to well.

(10-16-2013 10:40 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  I've never seen a job that asked if you posed racy pictures in your past. This is soo stooopid. It sounds more to me like she wouldn't give it up to the principle or someone in charge of firing. And some fat or insecure parents want to keep her out.

Unless she's f*cking the students (which would have been a dream come true for us guys) or stripping in class or dressing too provacative then they had absloutely NO reason to fire her.

The only way I'll agree with this is if she's a liberal. Horrible, yes, but true.

But when it is a male teacher and a female student, fire him, put him in jail and throw away the key.

(10-16-2013 10:57 AM)zyxwvutsru Wrote:  It is Texas, a right-to-work state. You can get fired for anything. Believe me, I have fired people for no real reason, other than I felt like it that day.

And, she's smoking hot. Wowza!

Remind me to not work for you. I have to say, you sound like an a-hole when you do **** like that. Your power to do so should be taken away from you unless of course you own the company then you will be out of business soon enough.

(10-16-2013 12:30 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 10:57 AM)zyxwvutsru Wrote:  It is Texas, a right-to-work state. You can get fired for anything. Believe me, I have fired people for no real reason, other than I felt like it that day.

And, she's smoking hot. Wowza!

Remind me to not work for you. I have to say, you sound like an a-hole when you do **** like that. Your power to do so should be taken away from you unless of course you own the company then you will be out of business soon enough.

You will never move to Texas, and I will never move to Illinois. So, no worries.

And thank you, I am an a$$hole, from El Paso.

(10-16-2013 10:57 AM)zyxwvutsru Wrote:  It is Texas, a right-to-work state. You can get fired for anything. Believe me, I have fired people for no real reason, other than I felt like it that day.

And, she's smoking hot. Wowza!

"Right to work" and "work at will" are 2 different things
"work at will" is where you work at the will of the employer
"Right to work" is where you have the right to work without joining an organization ( labor union, labor association , etc)

(10-16-2013 12:52 PM)sparkomemphis Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 10:57 AM)zyxwvutsru Wrote:  It is Texas, a right-to-work state. You can get fired for anything. Believe me, I have fired people for no real reason, other than I felt like it that day.

And, she's smoking hot. Wowza!

"Right to work" and "work at will" are 2 different things
"work at will" is where you work at the will of the employer
"Right to work" is where you have the right to work without joining an organization ( labor union, labor association , etc)

You are correct, and Texas is both.

(10-16-2013 12:48 PM)zyxwvutsru Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 12:30 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 10:57 AM)zyxwvutsru Wrote:  It is Texas, a right-to-work state. You can get fired for anything. Believe me, I have fired people for no real reason, other than I felt like it that day.

And, she's smoking hot. Wowza!

Remind me to not work for you. I have to say, you sound like an a-hole when you do **** like that. Your power to do so should be taken away from you unless of course you own the company then you will be out of business soon enough.

You will never move to Texas, and I will never move to Illinois. So, no worries.

And thank you, I am an a$$hole, from El Paso.

I can tell. You destroy people's lives to make yourself feel better. Awesome.

(10-16-2013 12:18 PM)AngryAphid Wrote:  Teaching as a second career choice.

I'd be a bit uncomfortable if I found out my Doctor
became an MD after failing in the porn industry.

Not if you were a single, 18 year old horn dog... You'd be trying to tap.........................that........................arse.........................unless it was a dude.

(10-16-2013 12:25 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 10:40 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  I've never seen a job that asked if you posed racy pictures in your past. This is soo stooopid. It sounds more to me like she wouldn't give it up to the principle or someone in charge of firing. And some fat or insecure parents want to keep her out.

Unless she's f*cking the students (which would have been a dream come true for us guys) or stripping in class or dressing too provacative then they had absloutely NO reason to fire her.

The only way I'll agree with this is if she's a liberal. Horrible, yes, but true.

But when it is a male teacher and a female student, fire him, put him in jail and throw away the key.

Yeah that's bullcrap too unless he forces it...

(10-16-2013 12:25 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 10:40 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  I've never seen a job that asked if you posed racy pictures in your past. This is soo stooopid. It sounds more to me like she wouldn't give it up to the principle or someone in charge of firing. And some fat or insecure parents want to keep her out.

Unless she's f*cking the students (which would have been a dream come true for us guys) or stripping in class or dressing too provacative then they had absloutely NO reason to fire her.

The only way I'll agree with this is if she's a liberal. Horrible, yes, but true.

But when it is a male teacher and a female student, fire him, put him in jail and throw away the key.

In a normal, heterosexual situation, the male is the hunter and the female is the prey. Yes, there is a double standard as there should be.

Can someone post the pics so we can see make an informed decision for our selves?

(10-16-2013 02:32 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Can someone post the pics so we can see make an informed decision for our selves?

Not guilty

(10-16-2013 02:38 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 02:32 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Can someone post the pics so we can see make an informed decision for our selves?

Not guilty

Agreed. She looks innocent enough....

Positive Rep me and I'll vote for Obama in 2016

(10-16-2013 02:38 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 02:32 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Can someone post the pics so we can see make an informed decision for our selves?

Not guilty

That's not even a good picture of her either...

Hot for Teacher seems an appropriate theme song for this thread.

(10-16-2013 10:25 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  Depends, did she lie on the job application? If so, she deserved to be fired. If the application was written in a manner which she did not have to disclose the photo shoot, shame on the school system.

Depends on the lie... If it was omission that's still not reason under any circumstances.