Could y'all imagine if Keenum starts and actually gets us a W...OMG the city would go crazy! ALL those UH haters would be eating SOOO much crow!

I bet it would get UH lots of attention!

If he's injured they will boo.

Misleading thread title.

The Texans need a new starting QB, plain and simple... cough... Keenum... cough.

UH by 10

(10-15-2013 10:02 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Misleading thread title.

How so? I put OT on there

(10-15-2013 11:31 PM)dezagcoog Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 10:02 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Misleading thread title.

How so? I put OT on there

Kubiak hasn't made an official decision yet. So yes, it's misleading...for now, anyway.

(10-15-2013 11:46 PM)GeminiShamrock Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 11:31 PM)dezagcoog Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 10:02 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Misleading thread title.

How so? I put OT on there

Kubiak hasn't made an official decision yet. So yes, it's misleading...for now, anyway.

I didn't argue, I asked. No need to be snarky. If I put a question mark at the end would that make u happy about it?

I dont like or hate the texans

If Keenum ends as their starting QB they are my favorite team.

(10-15-2013 11:48 PM)dezagcoog Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 11:46 PM)GeminiShamrock Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 11:31 PM)dezagcoog Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 10:02 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Misleading thread title.

How so? I put OT on there

Kubiak hasn't made an official decision yet. So yes, it's misleading...for now, anyway.

I didn't argue, I asked. No need to be snarky. If I put a question mark at the end would that make u happy about it?

Just giving you a hard time, fellow Coog. And actually, it would be more factual if you did. (Sorry. It's the former journalist in me.)

(10-15-2013 11:51 PM)panicstricken Wrote:  I dont like or hate the texans

If Keenum ends as their starting QB they are my favorite team.

Who's your favorite NFL team right now?

(10-15-2013 11:31 PM)dezagcoog Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 10:02 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Misleading thread title.

How so? I put OT on there

OT means off topic, meaning it isn't AAC related. Your thread title says "Keenum starting against KC" as if it's been announced, which it hasn't.

(10-15-2013 11:51 PM)panicstricken Wrote:  I dont like or hate the texans

If Keenum ends as their starting QB they are my favorite team.

(10-16-2013 12:21 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 11:31 PM)dezagcoog Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 10:02 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Misleading thread title.

How so? I put OT on there

OT means off topic, meaning it isn't AAC related. Your thread title says "Keenum starting against KC" as if it's been announced, which it hasn't.

Thank you.

(10-16-2013 12:21 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 11:31 PM)dezagcoog Wrote:  

(10-15-2013 10:02 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Misleading thread title.

How so? I put OT on there

OT means off topic, meaning it isn't AAC related. Your thread title says "Keenum starting against KC" as if it's been announced, which it hasn't.

Yes, Thank you for helping me understand without being a jerk! thanks!

Unless Keenum can block for himself it wont matter.

(10-16-2013 10:50 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Unless Keenum can block for himself it wont matter.

He doesn't block when the pocket breaks, he moves, still makes the pass and completes it.

(10-17-2013 01:43 AM)Brian Reading Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 10:50 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Unless Keenum can block for himself it wont matter.

He doesn't block when the pocket breaks, he moves, still makes the pass and completes it.

hahaha, ok. Sure. He will spend half his time on his back just like Schaub and Yates.

(10-17-2013 07:31 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(10-17-2013 01:43 AM)Brian Reading Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 10:50 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Unless Keenum can block for himself it wont matter.

He doesn't block when the pocket breaks, he moves, still makes the pass and completes it.

hahaha, ok. Sure. He will spend half his time on his back just like Schaub and Yates.

I wish I had a crystal ball too! It's funny how it seems like you don't remember the butt whipping he gave y'all.

(10-17-2013 09:08 AM)dezagcoog Wrote:  

(10-17-2013 07:31 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(10-17-2013 01:43 AM)Brian Reading Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 10:50 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Unless Keenum can block for himself it wont matter.

He doesn't block when the pocket breaks, he moves, still makes the pass and completes it.

hahaha, ok. Sure. He will spend half his time on his back just like Schaub and Yates.

I wish I had a crystal ball too! It's funny how it seems like you don't remember the butt whipping he gave y'all.

A lot of QBs give us butt whippings. It doesnt qualify them as great NFL QBs behind a suspect OL. If it did the guy from MTSU the last 4 years would be a HoFer.

(10-17-2013 09:13 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(10-17-2013 09:08 AM)dezagcoog Wrote:  

(10-17-2013 07:31 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(10-17-2013 01:43 AM)Brian Reading Wrote:  

(10-16-2013 10:50 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Unless Keenum can block for himself it wont matter.

He doesn't block when the pocket breaks, he moves, still makes the pass and completes it.

hahaha, ok. Sure. He will spend half his time on his back just like Schaub and Yates.

I wish I had a crystal ball too! It's funny how it seems like you don't remember the butt whipping he gave y'all.

A lot of QBs give us butt whippings. It doesnt qualify them as great NFL QBs behind a suspect OL. If it did the guy from MTSU the last 4 years would be a HoFer.

I don't think it does either. But that game, and others, does remind me of how many times he had to escape the pocket and throw while running cause of UH's suspect OL. Just saying I remember that.