(10-14-2013 09:31 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(10-14-2013 02:27 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  Are these folks supporting the Catholic priests who were guilty of pedophilia? Maybe they can have a vigil for Jerry Sandusky.

Can you point at anyone here defending a Catholic Priest who had sex with a minor or do you just feel like fighting straw men.

First of all, hone your reading skills. I questioned whether the folks supporting the cause of intergenerational sex would extend their support to those previously charged and/or convicted, for example priests and Jerry Sandusky, as being pedophiles. I didn't suggest that anyone was doing that now. Furthermore, I questioned whether the people supporting normalization would defend those convicted. I didn't accuse anyone on this board of doing that. Those are pretty big differences. Can you understand that or is it too complicated for your knee jerk reactive mind?

The OP included the following statement from a conference:
"Pedophiles are "unfairly stigmatized and demonized" by society."

Therefore, for those who support normalizing intergenerational sex, and in order to not be hypocritical, they should come out in defense of the priests, and Jerry Sandusky. I'm just asking if they will. Get it?

(10-14-2013 02:48 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(10-14-2013 02:24 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  This is still on the fringe of the fringe, so I don't think it's fair to call it the Left's new "crusade".

However, ~60 years ago homosexuality was just as much on the fringe as this stuff is now, and we see how social attitudes about that changed in one lifetime. So people should be careful with predictions about where "intergenerational romance" will be 60 from now.

That's not a fair statement, 50 years before that you could say the same thing about interracial marriage, and 150 years before that, slavery.

Not at all, but thanks for trying to change the thread.

Quote:Child abusers/molesters are equally despised on each side of the aisle.

Guess the first post on this thread proves you wrong. What's that like BTW?

(10-14-2013 10:02 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(10-14-2013 06:43 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  So here are some characteristics of the left that should alarm us all.

-promote killing unborn babies as a form of population and welfare control.
-advocate unisex locker rooms in our public schools.
-feel the gay agenda should be taught in our public schools.
-want any mention of Christianity banned from all public schools.
-advocate sexual relationships between adults and minors.

Yes, this list came with my Brown Shirt and poster of Most Honorable Chairman Obama that we must pray to each morning and evening.

You can't really refute any of that. The left is pushing those agendas.

Sounds like something the LGBT and the the gay/boy love groups that are out there would promote. It is a shame that this stuff is being promoted as being okay by these types of groups. Sickening really. This falls under being just as bad as child rape, child abductions, child sex trafficking, etc....just sickening.

(10-15-2013 08:28 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-14-2013 10:02 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(10-14-2013 06:43 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  So here are some characteristics of the left that should alarm us all.

-promote killing unborn babies as a form of population and welfare control.
-advocate unisex locker rooms in our public schools.
-feel the gay agenda should be taught in our public schools.
-want any mention of Christianity banned from all public schools.
-advocate sexual relationships between adults and minors.

Yes, this list came with my Brown Shirt and poster of Most Honorable Chairman Obama that we must pray to each morning and evening.

You can't really refute any of that. The left is pushing those agendas.

Burden of proof is on the person pushing the claim (you).

(10-14-2013 03:17 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(10-14-2013 03:16 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Freshman girl and senior guy? Always creeped me out too but it happens, and I'm not sure it should be illegal.

Dude.

It's true...lots of Sr dudes at my HS had Frosh girl friends...that would be 18-14

(10-15-2013 09:00 AM)hburg Wrote:  Sounds like something the LGBT and the the gay/boy love groups that are out there would promote. It is a shame that this stuff is being promoted as being okay by these types of groups. Sickening really. This falls under being just as bad as child rape, child abductions, child sex trafficking, etc....just sickening.

There is no link between the LGBT community and some man-boy group...if you're a gay man, you're attracted to other men...not little boys...if you're a lesbian, you like women...not little girls.

(10-14-2013 11:00 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(10-14-2013 10:39 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(10-14-2013 10:01 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(10-14-2013 09:31 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(10-14-2013 02:27 PM)QuestionSocratic Wrote:  Are these folks supporting the Catholic priests who were guilty of pedophilia? Maybe they can have a vigil for Jerry Sandusky.

Can you point at anyone here defending a Catholic Priest who had sex with a minor or do you just feel like fighting straw men.

Can you point to any real, visible member of the left crusading to allow adults to diddle kid? Crazies are crazies, and their political affiliations aren't a valid criticism against those political parties unless those members have attained a level of influence in the party.

Does Glaad count?

http://www.glaad.org/blog/florida-teen-f...ay-parents

Diligent action is needed to convince Bruce Colton and Brian Workman to drop the charges pressed against 18 year old Kaitlyn and give her the opportunity to pursue the fulfilling life she deserves to lead. The petition on change.org has over 58,000 signatures from those showing their support for Kaitlyn. Her parents are aiming for 75,000 signatures in hope that the voices of those who recognize this as unfair will convince Colton and Workman to drop the charges against their daughter. We encourage you to add your support and signature at change.org to ensure Kaitlyn is treated fairly, and that the law is not being used against her simply because she was in a same-sex relationship.

Or is Glaad nothing but a small group of extremest?

Haha did you read that article before you posted it? That was a case of a 17 year old girl dating a 15 year old girl. The parents of the 15 year old didn't approve of the relationship, and waited until their daughters girlfriend turned 18, then pressed charges resulting in her being expelled from school and charged with a felony.

This is a senior dating a sophomore in High School, and this is a perfect example of the problem with some of our statutory rape laws; they're selectively enforced. But this is not in anyway, shape, or form pedophilia or as I put it 'the left crusading to allow adults to diddle kids'.

You are wrong about 17-15.
A 19-year-old Florida teen behind bars for having relations with an underage girl says she has no apologies but does have one regret — that she ever trusted her ex-girlfriend.

Speaking from the Indian River County Jail, Kaitlyn Hunt told WPTV that she believes she was "set up" by her now 15-year-old exe and that she didn't know she was doing anything illegal when they began dating last year.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national...z2hoLWDqWf

Also,

An initial plea deal requiring Hunt to plead guilty to child abuse was offered to the older teen, but she rejected it and argued that their relationship was consensual.

A second plea deal was rescinded after it was found that Hunt was continuing to send the 15-year-old girl text messages that included nude photos and video. That discovery led to additional charges of transmitting nude photos to a minor on top of two counts of lewd and lascivious battery on a child

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national...z2hoMoPRjH