http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketba...redictions



1. Duke 100%

2. Syracuse 50% / North Carolina 34% / Notre Dame 16%

3. Syracuse 50% / North Carolina 34% / Notre Dame 16%

4. Notre Dame 50% / North Carolina 34% / Virginia 16%

5. Virginia 84% / Notre Dame 16%

6. Maryland 84% / Pitt 16%

7. Pitt 50% / Boston College 34% / Maryland 16%

8. Boston College 50% / Pitt 34% / Miami 16%

9. Georgia Tech 66% / Florida State 34%

10. Florida State 50% / Wake Forest 34% / NC State 16%

11. NC State 84% / Boston College 16%

12. Georgia Tech 34% / Wake Forest 34% / Florida State 16% / Miami 16%

13. Miami 66% / Clemson 16% / Wake Forest 16%

14. Clemson 84% / Virginia Tech 16%

15. Virginia Tech 84% / Wake Forest 16%

Nothing to see here. Move along......

Edit : Had Seth Greenberg not been forced out, I'd feel confident we wouldn't finish last. Oh well.

What's wrong with that Norlander dude picking Va Tech 14th? He even picked Notre Dame #2... is he crazy?
;-)

(09-30-2013 09:33 PM)ChrisLords Wrote:  Nothing to see here. Move along......

Edit : Had Seth Greenberg not been forced out, I'd feel confident we wouldn't finish last. Oh well.

He needed to go. Green wasn't going to play for him again. We didn't have any recruits either.

Should be a fun first year in the best basketball conference assembled, I see 8 teams making the tourney with maybe FSU or GT having a say so as well. Duke, UNC, Cuse, UMD, UVA, Pitt, ND, BC

Good to see 'Cuse picked 2 or 3. They should give Duke a major run for the ACC title. Can't wait to see Ennis and the boys play against Duke and UNC.

It really says something if Pitt is picked so low and they are as good as they are.

(10-01-2013 12:05 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  It really says something if Pitt is picked so low and they are as good as they are.

Pitt is not expected to be anywhere near as good as they have been in previous years. I believe they lost most if not all of their starters. It would be totally different if they had some experience coming back.

(10-01-2013 12:10 PM)cuseroc Wrote:  

(10-01-2013 12:05 PM)Ole Blue Wrote:  It really says something if Pitt is picked so low and they are as good as they are.

Pitt is not expected to be anywhere near as good as they have been in previous years. I believe they lost most if not all of their starters. It would be totally different if they had some experience coming back.

They have three starters returning, I think they have a real potential to surprise some people. Pitt is almost always underrated by the national media and then by the end of the season are in the top 25 again.