(09-30-2013 11:09 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:07 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Wait, people buy porn?

hey pornstars gotta make money too

Damn you are stupid barebackjonjon.

(09-30-2013 11:01 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 09:18 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Busines...202&page=1

Not only is it more conservative, more porn, it's more RELIGIOUSLY conservative, more porn. Utah tops the list.

Actually, that study is per 1000, not totals based on the entire population. Blue states typically have more people. Therefore, it's logical to assume more people watch porn in CA than Utah.

Poll fail.

Ok, you're an idiot and can no longer be taken seriously.

Take a stats class before you start talking about stats. Per capita is a thing.

(09-30-2013 11:11 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:08 AM)john01992 Wrote:  if they only polled 1000 people then how did they end up with a decimal??????

big fail on your part LSU

You want to re-read and make your appropriate edits?

:facepalm:

sorry LSU

its dixie here whose the dumba.s.s

(09-30-2013 11:14 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:11 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:08 AM)john01992 Wrote:  if they only polled 1000 people then how did they end up with a decimal??????

big fail on your part LSU

You want to re-read and make your appropriate edits?

i dunno what to say

did you miss your own mistake?

You answered a question I didn't ask and told me it was a big fail on my part.

(09-30-2013 11:13 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:01 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 09:18 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Busines...202&page=1

Not only is it more conservative, more porn, it's more RELIGIOUSLY conservative, more porn. Utah tops the list.

Actually, that study is per 1000, not totals based on the entire population. Blue states typically have more people. Therefore, it's logical to assume more people watch porn in CA than Utah.

Poll fail.

Ok, you're an idiot and can no longer be taken seriously.

Take a stats class before you start talking about stats. Per capita is a thing.

If out off 1,000, 700 are religious and 200 watch porn, the 200 don't necessarily come out of the 700. Your theory that religiously conservative = more porn doesn't hold water either. More likely libs awatching it since they can't score with the mormon chicks.

If out off 1,000, 700 are religious and 200 watch porn, the 200 don't necessarily come out of the 700. Your theory that religiously conservative = more porn doesn't hold water either. More likely libs awatching it since they can't score with the mormon chicks.

i dont think it has anything to do with religion

i think it has more to do with conservative states having higher crime rates, poorer & less educated than blue states.

(09-30-2013 11:06 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:01 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 09:18 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Busines...202&page=1

Not only is it more conservative, more porn, it's more RELIGIOUSLY conservative, more porn. Utah tops the list.

Actually, that study is per 1000, not totals based on the entire population. Blue states typically have more people. Therefore, it's logical to assume more people watch porn in CA than Utah.

Poll fail.

um no.....

per 1000 is a measure of per capita its not a "we polled only 1000 people" thing

um yeah.

The biggest consumer, Utah, averaged 5.47 adult content subscriptions per 1000 home broadband users; Montana bought the least with 1.92 per 1000. "The differences here are not so stark," Edelman says

Utah Population - 2.855 million
California Population - 38.04 million

I'm pretty sure more people in CA are watching porn

(09-30-2013 11:18 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:13 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:01 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 09:18 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Busines...202&page=1

Not only is it more conservative, more porn, it's more RELIGIOUSLY conservative, more porn. Utah tops the list.

Actually, that study is per 1000, not totals based on the entire population. Blue states typically have more people. Therefore, it's logical to assume more people watch porn in CA than Utah.

Poll fail.

Ok, you're an idiot and can no longer be taken seriously.

Take a stats class before you start talking about stats. Per capita is a thing.

If out off 1,000, 700 are religious and 200 watch porn, the 200 don't necessarily come out of the 700. Your theory that religiously conservative = more porn doesn't hold water either. More likely libs awatching it since they can't score with the mormon chicks.

That's not what "per 1000" means. That's why you and okladixie are idiots.

The numbers are normalized per 1000 residents. They took overall numbers and then divided by the population of the state. So, if Texas had 1,000,000 people watching porn and Utah had 500,000, you divide the numbers to account for the difference in population.

(09-30-2013 12:38 PM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:18 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:13 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:01 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 09:18 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Busines...202&page=1

Not only is it more conservative, more porn, it's more RELIGIOUSLY conservative, more porn. Utah tops the list.

Actually, that study is per 1000, not totals based on the entire population. Blue states typically have more people. Therefore, it's logical to assume more people watch porn in CA than Utah.

Poll fail.

Ok, you're an idiot and can no longer be taken seriously.

Take a stats class before you start talking about stats. Per capita is a thing.

If out off 1,000, 700 are religious and 200 watch porn, the 200 don't necessarily come out of the 700. Your theory that religiously conservative = more porn doesn't hold water either. More likely libs awatching it since they can't score with the mormon chicks.

That's not what "per 1000" means. That's why you and okladixie are idiots.

The numbers are normalized per 1000 residents. They took overall numbers and then divided by the population of the state. So, if Texas had 1,000,000 people watching porn and Utah had 500,000, you divide the numbers to account for the difference in population.

I have no idea what you are talking about other than you are wrong on your claim that more people in red states are watching porn.

I have effectively pointed out your fallacy. You are the idiot if you think more people in Utah are watching porn opposed to states like CA or NY.

(09-30-2013 12:07 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:06 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:01 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 09:18 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Busines...202&page=1

Not only is it more conservative, more porn, it's more RELIGIOUSLY conservative, more porn. Utah tops the list.

Actually, that study is per 1000, not totals based on the entire population. Blue states typically have more people. Therefore, it's logical to assume more people watch porn in CA than Utah.

Poll fail.

um no.....

per 1000 is a measure of per capita its not a "we polled only 1000 people" thing

um yeah.

The biggest consumer, Utah, averaged 5.47 adult content subscriptions per 1000 home broadband users; Montana bought the least with 1.92 per 1000. "The differences here are not so stark," Edelman says

Utah Population - 2.855 million
California Population - 38.04 million

I'm pretty sure more people in CA are watching porn

per capita......per ******* capita........per capita......

your stupidity is making me wanna pull my hair out.

I give up, and I suggest you do too, john. The sky is green in these people's world.

(09-30-2013 12:44 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 12:07 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:06 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 11:01 AM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 09:18 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Busines...202&page=1

Not only is it more conservative, more porn, it's more RELIGIOUSLY conservative, more porn. Utah tops the list.

Actually, that study is per 1000, not totals based on the entire population. Blue states typically have more people. Therefore, it's logical to assume more people watch porn in CA than Utah.

Poll fail.

um no.....

per 1000 is a measure of per capita its not a "we polled only 1000 people" thing

um yeah.

The biggest consumer, Utah, averaged 5.47 adult content subscriptions per 1000 home broadband users; Montana bought the least with 1.92 per 1000. "The differences here are not so stark," Edelman says

Utah Population - 2.855 million
California Population - 38.04 million

I'm pretty sure more people in CA are watching porn

per capita......per ******* capita........per capita......

your stupidity is making me wanna pull my hair out.

We get that john. However, that is not the premise. That is the whole point. Logic is not a liberal's best friend.

Quote:john is right, red states watch more porn than blue states

That is a fallacious statement. The red states in the poll provided on this thread have a much lower population than most blue states.

if this is dixie's logic on porn......

when we get to GDP....hes gonna say total stat's dont matter, we can only use per capita to accurately represent the data

notice how he flip-flops on the per capita vs total stats whenever it fits his argument????

talk about being two faced......

(09-30-2013 12:50 PM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  I give up, and I suggest you do too, john. The sky is green in these people's world.

dude ive known dixie a long time and this is not the first time hes made this argument before

(09-30-2013 01:06 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 12:50 PM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  I give up, and I suggest you do too, john. The sky is green in these people's world.

dude ive known dixie a long time and this is not the first time hes made this argument before

Your sad troll attempt only makes you look even more silly. Next time suggest that the OP choose his premise more wisely.

So watching porn impacts the brain but violent video games don't.

(09-30-2013 10:56 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 09:18 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Busines...202&page=1

Not only is it more conservative, more porn, it's more RELIGIOUSLY conservative, more porn. Utah tops the list.

notice how this shut all the cons up.....

Ummm maybe I don't reply because it's poingout out the failed logic I already showed you..

This is *SOLD* pornography and not *WATCHED* porn

Quote:A new nationwide study (pdf) of anonymised credit-card receipts from a major online adult entertainment provider finds little variation in consumption between states.

I'm not saying that more lib or more conservative states will watch more because I really don't know. But if you two lightweights could stop saying this study says something it does not say.

(09-30-2013 02:04 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 10:56 AM)john01992 Wrote:  

(09-30-2013 09:18 AM)mixduptransistor Wrote:  http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Busines...202&page=1

Not only is it more conservative, more porn, it's more RELIGIOUSLY conservative, more porn. Utah tops the list.

notice how this shut all the cons up.....

Ummm maybe I don't reply because it's poingout out the failed logic I already showed you..

This is *SOLD* pornography and not *WATCHED* porn

Quote:A new nationwide study (pdf) of anonymised credit-card receipts from a major online adult entertainment provider finds little variation in consumption between states.

I'm not saying that more lib or more conservative states will watch more because I really don't know. But if you two lightweights could stop saying this study says something it does not say.

its really hard to say that the state that buys more porn watches lesser amounts......

its very very hard to argue that