(09-19-2013 12:55 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:46 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:27 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  That's another reason liberals will feel good about voting for her. Instead of her being the best person for the job, then can vote for the first woman and first bi sexual person.

You forgot just voting for her to keep another Republican from ******* things up.

So, you're cool with another Democrat doing it. Gotcha.

David Vitter ® is still a Senator. He paid a prostitute to dress him diapers, cheated on his wife, broke the law, all while moralizing about the LEGAL sexual activities of consenting unmarried adults in the privacy of their homes.

And then there's Newt. And Larry Craig (who didn't resign by the way). I could go on for days.

Gov McGreevey (D-NJ) resigned. So did Elliot Spitzer (D-NY). So did Weiner (D-NY).

You know, the Clinton's seem to have a perfectly fine marriage. Chelsea turned out pretty well. Bill and Hillary seem to be okay with each other.

I think the GOP has the Dems beat hands down when it comes to staying in office after getting freaky.

------------------------------------

"You have a right to privacy, you do not have a right to hypocrisy"
-Barney Frank, explaining why GOP sex scandals blow up worse than Dem ones.

What does any of that have to do with another Democrat ******* things up?

And I'm happy that Chelsea has out turned okay. Beating long odds for the child of a serial sexual predator.

I find every one of those people contemptible, including Frank.

(09-19-2013 12:20 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  Gee, would never have thought that....duh!!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...elsea.html

EW! I would be quicker to call Bill gay if it hadn't been for the belly roll Penthouse pic of that woman that looka like a man...

(09-19-2013 12:58 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:55 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:46 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:27 PM)oklalittledixie Wrote:  That's another reason liberals will feel good about voting for her. Instead of her being the best person for the job, then can vote for the first woman and first bi sexual person.

You forgot just voting for her to keep another Republican from ******* things up.

So, you're cool with another Democrat doing it. Gotcha.

David Vitter ® is still a Senator. He paid a prostitute to dress him diapers, cheated on his wife, broke the law, all while moralizing about the LEGAL sexual activities of consenting unmarried adults in the privacy of their homes.

And then there's Newt. And Larry Craig (who didn't resign by the way). I could go on for days.

Gov McGreevey (D-NJ) resigned. So did Elliot Spitzer (D-NY). So did Weiner (D-NY).

You know, the Clinton's seem to have a perfectly fine marriage. Chelsea turned out pretty well. Bill and Hillary seem to be okay with each other.

I think the GOP has the Dems beat hands down when it comes to staying in office after getting freaky.

------------------------------------

"You have a right to privacy, you do not have a right to hypocrisy"
-Barney Frank, explaining why GOP sex scandals blow up worse than Dem ones.

What does any of that have to do with another Democrat ******* things up?

I find every one of those people contemptible, including Frank.

I put that in there for your benefit sweetums. The larger point is that the GOP doesn't get rid of their worst sexual offenders, the Dems largely do. But there IS an issue with GOP sexual dalliances usually coming up with more press than Dem ones. It involves hypocrisy. Hillary isn't telling you how to run your marriage. Or who you can marry.

Besides, all y'all's talk about Hillary on this is just going to remind people of the impeachment attempt against Clinton. Subtract another 5 pts from the GOP and add it to the Dems.

Keep it up!

(09-19-2013 12:50 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  And even if true, who cares about the sexual mores of the next President of the USA, so long as what she does is legal, non-commercial, and between non-related consenting adults.

You guys are free to try this in 2016. I'll send pics from the Arkansas Ball in early 2017 at her inaugural.

She may not be in the mood for any balls that night.

(09-19-2013 12:51 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  HAHA, I just always assumed she was a lesbian and the marriage and kid were just to help her political career.

Now being a lesbo will help her political career... Ironic...

Not sure Tom that people are all that worried about points.

(09-19-2013 01:04 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:58 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:55 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:46 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  You forgot just voting for her to keep another Republican from ******* things up.

So, you're cool with another Democrat doing it. Gotcha.

David Vitter ® is still a Senator. He paid a prostitute to dress him diapers, cheated on his wife, broke the law, all while moralizing about the LEGAL sexual activities of consenting unmarried adults in the privacy of their homes.

And then there's Newt. And Larry Craig (who didn't resign by the way). I could go on for days.

Gov McGreevey (D-NJ) resigned. So did Elliot Spitzer (D-NY). So did Weiner (D-NY).

You know, the Clinton's seem to have a perfectly fine marriage. Chelsea turned out pretty well. Bill and Hillary seem to be okay with each other.

I think the GOP has the Dems beat hands down when it comes to staying in office after getting freaky.

------------------------------------

"You have a right to privacy, you do not have a right to hypocrisy"
-Barney Frank, explaining why GOP sex scandals blow up worse than Dem ones.

What does any of that have to do with another Democrat ******* things up?

I find every one of those people contemptible, including Frank.

I put that in there for your benefit sweetums. The larger point is that the GOP doesn't get rid of their worst sexual offenders, the Dems largely do. But there IS an issue with GOP sexual dalliances usually coming up with more press than Dem ones. It involves hypocrisy. Hillary isn't telling you how to run your marriage. Or who you can marry.

Besides, all y'all's talk about Hillary on this is just going to remind people of the impeachment attempt against Clinton. Subtract another 5 pts from the GOP and add it to the Dems.

Keep it up!

I'll type this slowly.

What does any of that have to do with Tom being okay with another Democrat ("another" meaning, "following the current one") ******* things up?

You've got a particular bee in your bonnet, and that's fine, but don't think for a second I give a damn who Hillary sweats up the sheets with. It is not germane to why I think she would suck as a president.

(09-19-2013 01:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:20 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  Gee, would never have thought that....duh!!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...elsea.html

EW! I would be quicker to call Bill gay if it hadn't been for the belly roll Penthouse pic of that woman that looka like a man...

Ha, gay is one thing Bill Clinton isn't.

Then again, I always assumed Al Gore and John Edwards were closeted homosexuals and it turned out they were hetero sleezeballs just like Clinton himself.

(09-19-2013 12:53 PM)GoApps70 Wrote:  Always figured that's why Hillary had Huma around.
Not so sure that Huma has a straight up and up marriage with Weiner.
Kind of odd he gets "caught" sending pictures on the internet to women so often.
Convenient.

She's tired of wiener.

(09-19-2013 01:07 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:51 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  HAHA, I just always assumed she was a lesbian and the marriage and kid were just to help her political career.

Now being a lesbo will help her political career... Ironic...

HAHA, good point.

Actually, Bill is nothing but an Uncle Tim... a disgrace to the male race:

Quote:White Knights are typically conservative men who are chivalrous and always trying to protect women and have no problem with biased laws that punish men while protecting women. Uncle Tims are generally liberal guys looking to get sex or political favors by being male sellouts to their own gender. They are the Bill Clinton types who crack down on their own gender, using biased laws such as sexual harassment while sleeping with women and using them.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/35...-interview

http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=650280

(09-19-2013 01:08 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 01:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:20 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  Gee, would never have thought that....duh!!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...elsea.html

EW! I would be quicker to call Bill gay if it hadn't been for the belly roll Penthouse pic of that woman that looka like a man...

Ha, gay is one thing Bill Clinton isn't.

Then again, I always assumed Al Gore and John Edwards were closeted homosexuals and it turned out they were hetero sleezeballs just like Clinton himself.

I'm just talking about that Genni pig he was dickin down lol... She looks like a dude

(09-19-2013 01:14 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Actually, Bill is nothing but an Uncle Tim... a disgrace to the male race:

Quote:White Knights are typically conservative men who are chivalrous and always trying to protect women and have no problem with biased laws that punish men while protecting women. Uncle Tims are generally liberal guys looking to get sex or political favors by being male sellouts to their own gender. They are the Bill Clinton types who crack down on their own gender, using biased laws such as sexual harassment while sleeping with women and using them.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/35...-interview

http://csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=650280

Damn, she called it!

(09-19-2013 01:14 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 01:08 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 01:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:20 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  Gee, would never have thought that....duh!!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...elsea.html

EW! I would be quicker to call Bill gay if it hadn't been for the belly roll Penthouse pic of that woman that looka like a man...

Ha, gay is one thing Bill Clinton isn't.

Then again, I always assumed Al Gore and John Edwards were closeted homosexuals and it turned out they were hetero sleezeballs just like Clinton himself.

I'm just talking about that Genni pig he was dickin down lol... She looks like a dude

To each his own. Monica had more cushion for the pushin (though she did have some bj lips). Obviously Bill doesn't have taste for the supermodels. With his personality and power, he can obviously do better than these women (and Hillary for that matter) if he wanted.

Never could figure that out @ Bill.

I just with I could fathom why the GOP has an issue reaching women. I keep trying, yet just can't seem to figure it out...

(09-19-2013 12:50 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  And even if true, who cares about the sexual mores of the next President of the USA, so long as what she does is legal, non-commercial, and between non-related consenting adults.

You guys are free to try this in 2016. I'll send pics from the Arkansas Ball in early 2017 at her inaugural.

America is dying to have an angry, shrill, pantsuited, Bull Dyke as POTUS.

Obama had the birth certificate, Hillary has being bi-sexual. I don't care. What I do care about is she got 4 Americans killed in Benghazi.

(09-19-2013 01:04 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  And then there's Newt.

You know, the Clinton's seem to have a perfectly fine marriage. Chelsea turned out pretty well. Bill and Hillary seem to be okay with each other.

I think the GOP has the Dems beat hands down when it comes to staying in office after getting freaky.

Not that the truth matters to you, but here you go;

http://www.creators.com/conservative/jac...aight.html

Quote:As for my parents' divorce, I can remember when they told me.

It was the spring of 1980.

I was 13 years old, and we were about to leave Fairfax, Va., and drive to Carrollton, Ga., for the summer. My parents told my sister and me that they were getting a divorce as our family of four sat around the kitchen table of our ranch home.

Soon afterward, my mom, sister and I got into our light-blue Chevrolet Impala and drove back to Carrollton.

Later that summer, Mom went to Emory University Hospital in Atlanta for surgery to remove a tumor. While she was there, Dad took my sister and me to see her.

It is this visit that has turned into the infamous hospital visit about which many untruths have been told. I won't repeat them. You can look them up online if you are interested in untruths. But here's what happened:

My mother and father were already in the process of getting a divorce, which she requested.

Dad took my sister and me to the hospital to see our mother.

She had undergone surgery the day before to remove a tumor.

The tumor was benign.

As with many divorces, it was hard and painful for all involved, but life continued.

BTW - how many times have you accidentally crapped yourself this week homo?

(09-19-2013 01:17 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 01:14 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 01:08 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 01:01 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(09-19-2013 12:20 PM)EagleRockCafe Wrote:  Gee, would never have thought that....duh!!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...elsea.html

EW! I would be quicker to call Bill gay if it hadn't been for the belly roll Penthouse pic of that woman that looka like a man...

Ha, gay is one thing Bill Clinton isn't.

Then again, I always assumed Al Gore and John Edwards were closeted homosexuals and it turned out they were hetero sleezeballs just like Clinton himself.

I'm just talking about that Genni pig he was dickin down lol... She looks like a dude

To each his own. Monica had more cushion for the pushin (though she did have some bj lips). Obviously Bill doesn't have taste for the supermodels. With his personality and power, he can obviously do better than these women (and Hillary for that matter) if he wanted.

He definitely had some tough decisions to make...








And look at this monstrosity they bred together...