(09-03-2013 09:52 AM)panicstricken Wrote: This conference doesnt need to be making fun of directional schools.
I agree. I never understand some people's bad-mouthing of "directional schools". As noted, the University of Southern California is an "unusual directionally named team" per the OP. Anyone who loses to them must suck.
Would Northern Illinois have a better reputation among some of these college football "fans" if they were called the University of DeKalb? If so, why? Why do some people around here think being named after your city or town (Pittsburgh, Louisville, etc) makes your name "ok", but being named after a whole region of your state is bad? To me, being named after your city is more "small time" compared to being named after a region.
There are plenty of schools named after cities that don't have great football teams or aren't in power conferences. Why don't we have posts about schools losing to "city teams" when some P5 school loses to Troy, Fresno St, San Jose St, Toldeo, Boise St, Bowling Green, etc, etc.
Names are just names. Individual schools should be judged on their own merits.
Being a school named "<State name> State" or "University of <State name>" doesn't mean you are power team (Arkansas State, Idaho, Illinois State, Missouri State, Montana, Tennessee State, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont, Maine, Wyoming, Montana State, Alabama State, etc)
Being a "unusual directionally named team" (whatever that is supposed to mean) doesn't mean you suck.