(09-01-2013 02:46 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Western Kentucky 35
Kentucky 26
Final

but GTS, isn't the SEC the strongest conference top to BOTTOM? I mean, losing to W Kentucy isn't something an SEC would do - much less 2 years in a row...

(09-01-2013 07:48 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 02:46 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Western Kentucky 35
Kentucky 26
Final

but GTS, isn't the SEC the strongest conference top to BOTTOM? I mean, losing to W Kentucy isn't something an SEC would do - much less 2 years in a row...

In football, Kentucky isn't exactly what you'd call a typical SEC team...

(09-01-2013 07:48 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 02:46 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Western Kentucky 35
Kentucky 26
Final

but GTS, isn't the SEC the strongest conference top to BOTTOM? I mean, losing to W Kentucy isn't something an SEC would do - much less 2 years in a row...

No, I believe the B12 is the one that lays claim to having the Power Bottom.

(09-01-2013 10:52 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 07:48 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 02:46 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Western Kentucky 35
Kentucky 26
Final

but GTS, isn't the SEC the strongest conference top to BOTTOM? I mean, losing to W Kentucy isn't something an SEC would do - much less 2 years in a row...

No, I believe the B12 is the one that lays claim to having the Power Bottom.

KSU and ISU have certainly earned their place in the college football hierarchy...

(09-01-2013 10:52 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  No, I believe the B12 is the one that lays claim to having the Power Bottom.

I didn't know San Francisco played in the Big 12.

(09-01-2013 11:08 AM)bitcruncher Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 10:52 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 07:48 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 02:46 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Western Kentucky 35
Kentucky 26
Final

but GTS, isn't the SEC the strongest conference top to BOTTOM? I mean, losing to W Kentucy isn't something an SEC would do - much less 2 years in a row...

No, I believe the B12 is the one that lays claim to having the Power Bottom.

KSU and ISU have certainly earned their place in the college football hierarchy...

K-State won the Big 12 last year.

(09-01-2013 02:37 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 10:52 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  No, I believe the B12 is the one that lays claim to having the Power Bottom.

I didn't know San Francisco played in the Big 12.

I think San Francisco is more of a baseball town, everyone is either a pitcher, a catcher or both.

(09-01-2013 04:17 PM)Wedge Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 11:08 AM)bitcruncher Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 10:52 AM)10thMountain Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 07:48 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 02:46 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Western Kentucky 35
Kentucky 26
Final

but GTS, isn't the SEC the strongest conference top to BOTTOM? I mean, losing to W Kentucy isn't something an SEC would do - much less 2 years in a row...

No, I believe the B12 is the one that lays claim to having the Power Bottom.

KSU and ISU have certainly earned their place in the college football hierarchy...

K-State won the Big 12 last year.

And then the whole team graduated...

(08-31-2013 08:43 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(08-31-2013 08:27 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  Northern Iowa 21

Iowa State. 14





Texas. 7

New Mexico State 7

If Iowa State loses that one after Iowa lost to Northern Illinois 30-27....what an embarrassing day it will be for those two programs.

What's embarrassing about losing to a better team?

Never understood how the Iowa teams get embarrassed by the local directional schools so frequently

(09-01-2013 10:06 PM)10thMountain Wrote:  Never understood how the Iowa teams get embarrassed by the local directional schools so frequently

Maybe the "local directional" is just better...

(09-01-2013 07:48 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 02:46 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Western Kentucky 35
Kentucky 26
Final

but GTS, isn't the SEC the strongest conference top to BOTTOM? I mean, losing to W Kentucy isn't something an SEC would do - much less 2 years in a row...

You, like many others, are confused about the SEC. You have LSU, Alabama, Florida, and one (MAYBE TWO) other team(s) each year that round out as the SEC teams to beat. This is why Clemson and Louisville got props last year. And Clemson, not losing much talent, is right back in the swing of things, though neither LSU or Florida were really tough teams last year.. Alabama wasn't either, but ND really just sucked THAT bad.