(08-12-2013 12:39 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote: I was perfectly willing to accept undisclosed reasons as an answer as I believe the coach doesn't have to answer to the fans about some decisions he makes. But since he chose to waive that, right, he should be a little clearer.
I can't believe the reporters didn't call him out on the vagueness.
How does removing Williams change the culture?
He says Williams didn't get In Trouble, so why was he kicked off.
What is about removing Williams and not other players changes the culture of UAB?
Why was this decision to change the culture made 3 weeks before the first game, unless there was some catalyst to cause the change.
Makes less sense now since he cleared things up.
I think he's in a tough spot. You're right. He doesn't really owe anyone an explanation about why he did what he did. But he can't literally say nothing, because it's obvious the kid's not out there anymore and isn't going to be back.
At the same time, if you (if I can go all second-person for a minute)
specifically state the reasons, then it looks like you're kicking the kid when he's down and that doesn't help him or the program. So you just leave it as "undisclosed." But when you leave it that way, minds (like ours) start to wander into areas he never intended. Was it drugs? Was it grades? Some other criminal issue? And the perception becomes far worse than the reality, which isn't fair to the kid at all. So you say it
wasn't those things, but you still don't really want to say exactly what it was because, again, it probably just comes down to the fact that you think he's not worth having around because of his terrible attitude, and saying that doesn't really help anybody.
So yeah...this doesn't really help us understand. But I don't think it was meant to; I think he just wanted to make it clear what it wasn't and leave it at that. I don't know if the reporter(s) tried to call him out or not, but if that's all he's going to say about it there's really not much they can do.