An unusually fair write up from team neocon.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/35...han-strong

I've faded out on NR the last few years, but I don't think it has ever sought to be the voice of the neoconservative camp, à la Commentary or the Weekly Standard. NR is open to neocon points-of-view, but also to libertarian and "paleo" views as well.

From the 1950s to the Bush/Cheney years (and still today, I guess), NR sought to fill an ecumenical role on the Right -- "Fusionism", in the term of former NR editor Frank Meyer.

(07-26-2013 07:02 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  An unusually fair write up from team neocon.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/35...han-strong

Sure I missed the discussion about this earlier. I was not surprised at all, and was surprised that people were surprised that the numbers we call are public information.