Miami has been below the average ACC attendance both of the last two seasons - their only two years of "the Golden era". Didn't feel like looking back further than that.

(08-21-2013 03:57 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  Miami has been below the average ACC attendance both of the last two seasons - their only two years of "the Golden era". Didn't feel like looking back further than that.

We are you so obsessed with Miami's attendance?

We [sic] are you so obsessed with me?

Two wrongs don't make a right, but I think the NCAA needs to save some face and move on from the Miami investigations.

When it comes to the bowl games lost, 2 is likely fair, along with those losses under normal penalty players could have left without consequence. That did not happen. I totally disagree on schollies, The U should be hit for a minimum of 5 a year for 3 years. All coaches mixed up in this should be sanctioned.

(08-23-2013 07:32 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  We [sic] are you so obsessed with me?

I told you a long time ago that I was gonna call you bull**** at every turn... so I do.

So, I answered you... why are you obsessed with Miami's attendance?

Talked to a few folks about a variety of things seems that Swofford believes profoundly that Miami will not have another bowl ban added on to what they have already done. Also something should be coming out soon everyone is surprised it's took this long it's been 10 weeks or so since Miami met with the NCAA. The usual guidelines for a reply or verdict by the NCAA is 8 to 13 weeks

(08-21-2013 03:57 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  Miami has been below the average ACC attendance both of the last two seasons - their only two years of "the Golden era". Didn't feel like looking back further than that.

That's nice, dear.