(06-14-2013 11:53 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 11:50 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 11:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 09:45 AM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 09:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  So, 27 posts over a red siren on the partisan drudge report. Anybody have a legitimate source we can debate? Or should we just continue tapping our fingers?

Seriously? I mean, it's only on like every news site out there right now (and has been since late yesterday afternoon). I haven't checked TPM, MJ, or Ezra Klein's column yet. I'm sure they're still cooking up a way to blame Republicans.

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-steps-milita...42046.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/world/...1&_r=1&hp&
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424...Europenews

Blow me. You guys run for the hills everytime Obama farts.

This must be the grown-up discussion you've been saying you want, but others just won't let you have.

Treating you like you treated me. Don't like it? Don't respond to me.

But I'm enjoying watching the mental breakdown you've been having lately.

(06-13-2013 05:55 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  So the Drudge Siren says that the US is getting involved in Syria including a no-fly zone.

I guess the scandals will be hitting close to home in the next few days.. Time for a diversion.

We should stay out of it. Let your buddy Notintheyahoo deal with Syria.

(06-13-2013 07:38 PM)Smaug Wrote:  McCain is a fool.

Going into Syria would be a terrible idea. With whom do ally ourselves, the side that hates our guts, or the side that hates our guts?

And you won't be able to blame McCain (although that might not stop you from trying) if we do. It'll be all O's.

I thought McCain was from Arizona not Alabama?

(06-13-2013 07:54 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-13-2013 07:38 PM)Smaug Wrote:  McCain is a fool.

Going into Syria would be a terrible idea. With whom do ally ourselves, the side that hates our guts, or the side that hates our guts?

And you won't be able to blame McCain (although that might not stop you from trying) if we do. It'll be all O's.

Neutralize the Syrian Chemicals and leave. We don't ally with any group. Take the Storage Depots, shoot anyone that encroaches on the perimeter, neutralize the weapons, pack up, go.

As for the things already loose, hopefully whoever has it will mishandle and kill themselves.

So you are FOR sending troops in?

(06-14-2013 12:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-13-2013 07:54 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-13-2013 07:38 PM)Smaug Wrote:  McCain is a fool.

Going into Syria would be a terrible idea. With whom do ally ourselves, the side that hates our guts, or the side that hates our guts?

And you won't be able to blame McCain (although that might not stop you from trying) if we do. It'll be all O's.

Neutralize the Syrian Chemicals and leave. We don't ally with any group. Take the Storage Depots, shoot anyone that encroaches on the perimeter, neutralize the weapons, pack up, go.

As for the things already loose, hopefully whoever has it will mishandle and kill themselves.

So you are FOR sending troops in?

More like a raid, not an invasion. It could be as simple as seizing a Depot and destroying all the Chemicals while inside their Bunkers.

(06-14-2013 12:25 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-13-2013 07:54 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-13-2013 07:38 PM)Smaug Wrote:  McCain is a fool.

Going into Syria would be a terrible idea. With whom do ally ourselves, the side that hates our guts, or the side that hates our guts?

And you won't be able to blame McCain (although that might not stop you from trying) if we do. It'll be all O's.

Neutralize the Syrian Chemicals and leave. We don't ally with any group. Take the Storage Depots, shoot anyone that encroaches on the perimeter, neutralize the weapons, pack up, go.

As for the things already loose, hopefully whoever has it will mishandle and kill themselves.

So you are FOR sending troops in?

More like a raid, not an invasion. It could be as simple as seizing a Depot and destroying all the Chemicals while inside their Bunkers.

In other words, yes.

(06-14-2013 08:12 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  ?

Which is it? We have to go in or lose credibility or We are going in to Wag the Dog. Can't be both.


He boxed himself in and Torch................ Come on MAN!!!!! If I had religious zealot idiots running around me. Just witnessed Quadaffi getting the scabbard up the tail pipe. Saw what happened to Mubarak. I'd gas them too.

It doesn't have to be an either/or. It is in the realm of possibility that it could be both.

(06-14-2013 12:20 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-13-2013 07:38 PM)Smaug Wrote:  McCain is a fool.

Going into Syria would be a terrible idea. With whom do ally ourselves, the side that hates our guts, or the side that hates our guts?

And you won't be able to blame McCain (although that might not stop you from trying) if we do. It'll be all O's.

I thought McCain was from Arizona not Alabama?

Run along, Robs. Adults are talking.

(06-14-2013 12:34 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:25 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-13-2013 07:54 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-13-2013 07:38 PM)Smaug Wrote:  McCain is a fool.

Going into Syria would be a terrible idea. With whom do ally ourselves, the side that hates our guts, or the side that hates our guts?

And you won't be able to blame McCain (although that might not stop you from trying) if we do. It'll be all O's.

Neutralize the Syrian Chemicals and leave. We don't ally with any group. Take the Storage Depots, shoot anyone that encroaches on the perimeter, neutralize the weapons, pack up, go.

As for the things already loose, hopefully whoever has it will mishandle and kill themselves.

So you are FOR sending troops in?

More like a raid, not an invasion. It could be as simple as seizing a Depot and destroying all the Chemicals while inside their Bunkers.

In other words, yes.

Robert:
Since you don't have the income to attend a MLB, NBA, NHL, or NFL event, you won't have to worry about being in a stadium/arena if a Chemical Weapon is detonated inside, exposing thousands to lethal levels of a nerve agent.

But maybe you have friends or family that do attend.

You really want these weapons unsecured?

(06-14-2013 01:01 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:34 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:25 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-13-2013 07:54 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  Neutralize the Syrian Chemicals and leave. We don't ally with any group. Take the Storage Depots, shoot anyone that encroaches on the perimeter, neutralize the weapons, pack up, go.

As for the things already loose, hopefully whoever has it will mishandle and kill themselves.

So you are FOR sending troops in?

More like a raid, not an invasion. It could be as simple as seizing a Depot and destroying all the Chemicals while inside their Bunkers.

In other words, yes.

Robert:
Since you don't have the income to attend a MLB, NBA, NHL, or NFL event, you won't have to worry about being in a stadium/arena if a Chemical Weapon is detonated inside, exposing thousands to lethal levels of a nerve agent.

But maybe you have friends or family that do attend.

You really want these weapons unsecured?

I genuinely believe he does, as long as "conservatives" are the targets.

Positive Rep me or I'll never let Prince Albert out of the can.

(06-14-2013 01:01 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:34 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:25 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-13-2013 07:54 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  Neutralize the Syrian Chemicals and leave. We don't ally with any group. Take the Storage Depots, shoot anyone that encroaches on the perimeter, neutralize the weapons, pack up, go.

As for the things already loose, hopefully whoever has it will mishandle and kill themselves.

So you are FOR sending troops in?

More like a raid, not an invasion. It could be as simple as seizing a Depot and destroying all the Chemicals while inside their Bunkers.

In other words, yes.

Robert:
Since you don't have the income to attend a MLB, NBA, NHL, or NFL event, you won't have to worry about being in a stadium/arena if a Chemical Weapon is detonated inside, exposing thousands to lethal levels of a nerve agent.

But maybe you have friends or family that do attend.

You really want these weapons unsecured?

Have your circle jerk buddy Notintheyahoo do it.

(06-14-2013 01:06 PM)ImMoreAwesomeThanYou Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:01 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:34 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:25 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 12:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  So you are FOR sending troops in?

More like a raid, not an invasion. It could be as simple as seizing a Depot and destroying all the Chemicals while inside their Bunkers.

In other words, yes.

Robert:
Since you don't have the income to attend a MLB, NBA, NHL, or NFL event, you won't have to worry about being in a stadium/arena if a Chemical Weapon is detonated inside, exposing thousands to lethal levels of a nerve agent.

But maybe you have friends or family that do attend.

You really want these weapons unsecured?

I genuinely believe he does, as long as "conservatives" are the targets.

Positive Rep me or I'll never let Prince Albert out of the can.

Well, as long as it is NASCAR...

Yeah, you want Syrian unity, put Israeli boots on the ground.

Robs, you're not even trying.

(06-14-2013 07:47 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I remember Wag the Dog comments when Clinton went after Bin Laden with cruise missles. I understand why the game is played but you can't on one hand say Obama boxed himself in and he has to go in or lose credibility and the next day post Wag the Dog time.....



Call him the world's worst chess player. Call his administration neophytes and it's rookie hour at 1600 but you can't claim Wag the Dog.

Clinton was accused of "wag the dog" when didn't go after OBL when he had the chance. He was too involved in the aftermath of Clintongate. You’ll remember him getting his knob polished in the Oval by a WH intern. The poor Billy only got caught because he splattered on the intern’s dress.

(06-14-2013 01:10 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Yeah, you want Syrian unity, put Israeli boots on the ground.

Robs, you're not even trying.

Well, given this country is run by Israel, our boots on the ground would have the same effect.

(06-14-2013 01:35 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:10 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Yeah, you want Syrian unity, put Israeli boots on the ground.

Robs, you're not even trying.

Well, given this country is run by Israel, our boots on the ground would have the same effect.

Our boots on the ground probably would have the same effect, but Israel is running America?

Now who's wearing a tinfoil hat?

(06-14-2013 01:36 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:35 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:10 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Yeah, you want Syrian unity, put Israeli boots on the ground.

Robs, you're not even trying.

Well, given this country is run by Israel, our boots on the ground would have the same effect.

Our boots on the ground probably would have the same effect, but Israel is running America?

Now who's wearing a tinfoil hat?

No tin foil hat here. If Israel has a problem with a country or group, it is inevitable that we go after that group or country in some way. THey let us use our soldiers for their dirty work.

(06-14-2013 01:41 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:36 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:35 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:10 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Yeah, you want Syrian unity, put Israeli boots on the ground.

Robs, you're not even trying.

Well, given this country is run by Israel, our boots on the ground would have the same effect.

Our boots on the ground probably would have the same effect, but Israel is running America?

Now who's wearing a tinfoil hat?

No tin foil hat here. If Israel has a problem with a country or group, it is inevitable that we go after that group or country in some way. THey let us use our soldiers for their dirty work.

This is you, isn't it?

(06-14-2013 01:45 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:41 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:36 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:35 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-14-2013 01:10 PM)Smaug Wrote:  Yeah, you want Syrian unity, put Israeli boots on the ground.

Robs, you're not even trying.

Well, given this country is run by Israel, our boots on the ground would have the same effect.

Our boots on the ground probably would have the same effect, but Israel is running America?

Now who's wearing a tinfoil hat?

No tin foil hat here. If Israel has a problem with a country or group, it is inevitable that we go after that group or country in some way. THey let us use our soldiers for their dirty work.

This is you, isn't it?

Nope.

So, twenty years from now will we be asking when are we getting out of Syria?
Dumb.