(05-26-2013 11:04 AM)13thOwl Wrote:  

(05-26-2013 10:34 AM)Almadenmike Wrote:  

(05-26-2013 05:30 AM)13thOwl Wrote:  

(05-25-2013 08:45 PM)13thOwl Wrote:  

(05-25-2013 06:45 PM)13thOwl Wrote:  40 in Warren Millers RPI.

Now 39 at Warren Miller.

Now 35 ...

Did you mean, perhaps, Warren Nolan? I don't see any RPI projections by a Warren Miller.

[maxwell smart's voice] missed it by that much...[end maxwell smart's voice]

We're up to 34 in Warren Zevon's.

(05-26-2013 12:30 PM)smackdaddy Wrote:  

(05-26-2013 11:04 AM)13thOwl Wrote:  

(05-26-2013 10:34 AM)Almadenmike Wrote:  

(05-26-2013 05:30 AM)13thOwl Wrote:  

(05-25-2013 08:45 PM)13thOwl Wrote:  Now 39 at Warren Miller.

Now 35 ...

Did you mean, perhaps, Warren Nolan? I don't see any RPI projections by a Warren Miller.

[maxwell smart's voice] missed it by that much...[end maxwell smart's voice]

We're up to 34 in Warren Zevon's.

Gimme a break, it was a bad day in dancing school. But his hair was perfect...

If there's any justice, we'll be in the top 30 in Warren Burger's RPI tomorrow morning.

(05-26-2013 07:40 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  If there's any justice, we'll be in the top 30 in Warren Burger's RPI tomorrow morning.

You're confusing two other rating services. The one you're mentioning never existed.

It was Earl Warren's RPI, and Hamilton Burger posts his own version of a pseudo-RPI.

The more common errors are to quote Earl Weaver, who never believed in RPI, only Wayne Graham's 3-run HR philosophy, and Hamilton Beach, which of course is a blender.

A mistake worthy of video.