Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
SEC Lacrosse
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
bitcruncher Offline
pepperoni roll psycho...
*

Posts: 61,859
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 526
I Root For: West Virginia
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post: #41
RE: SEC Lacrosse
The SEC doesn't need a GoR because nobody in their right mind would leave the best football conference in the nation...
06-01-2013 05:34 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
PurpleReigns Offline
I AM...PURPLE AND GOLD!
*

Posts: 17,842
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 230
I Root For: ECU
Location: ENC
Post: #42
RE: SEC Lacrosse
Again no one said the SEC was signing a/needed GoR I was just commenting on this nugget from the initial post:

Quote:2. It increases the SEC's profile to the extent that future conference expansion would garner a higher quality school(s). Do you have any doubt that this would be a huge plus in UVA or UNC's eyes?

Why would UVA and/or UNC leave the ACC and lose all of their TV revenue for upwards of a decade and how would the addition of the non-revanue LAX help sway that?
06-01-2013 06:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bigblueblindness Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,073
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 53
I Root For: UK, Lipscomb
Location: Kentucky
Post: #43
RE: SEC Lacrosse
(06-01-2013 06:12 PM)PurpleReigns2012 Wrote:  Again no one said the SEC was signing a/needed GoR I was just commenting on this nugget from the initial post:

Quote:2. It increases the SEC's profile to the extent that future conference expansion would garner a higher quality school(s). Do you have any doubt that this would be a huge plus in UVA or UNC's eyes?

Why would UVA and/or UNC leave the ACC and lose all of their TV revenue for upwards of a decade and how would the addition of the non-revanue LAX help sway that?

Fine, you are not trolling, just stating something that no one here is contesting. I don't know anyone that regularly posts on here that believes the SEC will chase any ACC team until the back end of their GoR. So...

Yes.
06-02-2013 11:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chargeradio Offline
Vamos Morados
*

Posts: 7,484
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 122
I Root For: ALA, KY, USA
Location: Louisville, KY
Post: #44
SEC Lacrosse
South Carolina's women's lacrosse program has been delayed since November 2008 due to field space issues. Is this program still going to happen?
06-25-2013 08:23 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
vandiver49 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,589
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 315
I Root For: USNA/UTK
Location: West GA
Post: #45
RE: SEC Lacrosse
When I was exposed to lax 15 years ago at the Naval Academy, I wouldn't have guessed then that the sport would have taken off in the south the way it has. Spending 4 years in the triangle of hate that is JHU, USNA and UMD, I understand the appeal of the game, but I wonder why lax is flourishing while soccer goes into its 40th year of trying to get a toehold in the US and tennis has completely fallen of the map.

In this regard I can understand JR's position. Maybe b/c I first encountered lax while in the Mid-Atlantic/NE and that has created some bias, but I just think its popularity in the south is part aspirational and part defeatism. The elite part of it is easy to identify, while the defeatism part is a little more subtle.

In school I was 5'8", 190 lbs and while that happens to be the perfect spec for a soldier, its damn near worthless in terms of athletics. I had no problems being an intramural warrior as 'I was going pro in something other than sports'. But when I went to college lax games I was amazed by the talent these players possessed and wondered 'why the hell are they hiding out in lax instead of playing baseball, basketball, tennis or hockey?'

At the time, its impossible not to notice the fact that most of the teams were white. There is nothing wrong with that fact, especially in light lacrosse's previous stated elite roots. But not all the teams my school competed against could have been considered elite, some in fact were quite middling (the schools academic perception, not the lax teams). Thus, I've just always had this nagging suspicion talented kids that play lax, along with water polo and rugby in this country was kind of a form of self-segregation.

I guess my specific lament is with regard to basketball as the demographics for whites in MLB and NFL are around 63%. But in the NBA, whites only make up 20% of the league. Now, in MLB the fact that blacks only make-up 8% of the league, down from an all time high of 17-19% is considered a major crisis. But the fact that the NBA has gone from about 40% white to 20% in about the same time frame is apparently not a cause for concern.

IMO, it's not a question of talent, as any of the guys I saw playing lax could have been the next Pistol Pete or Tom Chambers, but more of a question of willingness. That is what truly concerns me.

(this rambling diatribe has been brought to you by a black guy who is simply concerned for the game he loves)
06-27-2013 08:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bigblueblindness Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,073
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 53
I Root For: UK, Lipscomb
Location: Kentucky
Post: #46
RE: SEC Lacrosse
Good points, vandiver. From what I can tell, top level sports are becoming much more specialized, especially regarding body types and availability to resources. I think part of the reason tennis is dropping off in mass popularity is that it takes a lot of work to be any good, similar to golf. The competition is tremendous at the top levels because it is such an international sport. I played tennis for my university (Lipscomb) as we were transitioning to D1 from NAIA. To give you an idea of who we recruited, our best player was the #1 player from the state of Tennessee. In most sports, you would expect the #1 player in a state for a sport to be the best player for an SEC team. For tennis, those top SEC players have to be the best of the best in the US, or else they will come from overseas. The opportunities for scholarships and to actually play on the team are also limited to 6 players, and most schools carry 10 total players, at most. I think LAX has the mass team appeal of football for guys that do not have a football body or who are smart enough to not put their bodies through the wringer of football. Doesn't LAX carry anywhere from 35 to 50 guys?

Factor in that most schools already have a ready made LAX field because of football stadiums, and LAX seems to be a good mass appeal sport that is easy for a school to add. Baseball fields are harder to come by because they are so specialized in their use. A football field can be used for a ton of other activities.
06-27-2013 09:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
10thMountain Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,358
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation: 357
I Root For: A&M, TCU
Location:
Post: #47
RE: SEC Lacrosse
My theory is that lacrosse has appeal of hockey (they are both decedents of the same native American stick and ball games), ie high scoring, fast pace, rough contact but doesn't have a lot of the negatives: special arena/time of the year, tons of Canadians ( 03-wink )
06-27-2013 09:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,192
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7907
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #48
RE: SEC Lacrosse
(06-27-2013 08:17 AM)vandiver49 Wrote:  When I was exposed to lax 15 years ago at the Naval Academy, I wouldn't have guessed then that the sport would have taken off in the south the way it has. Spending 4 years in the triangle of hate that is JHU, USNA and UMD, I understand the appeal of the game, but I wonder why lax is flourishing while soccer goes into its 40th year of trying to get a toehold in the US and tennis has completely fallen of the map.

In this regard I can understand JR's position. Maybe b/c I first encountered lax while in the Mid-Atlantic/NE and that has created some bias, but I just think its popularity in the south is part aspirational and part defeatism. The elite part of it is easy to identify, while the defeatism part is a little more subtle.

In school I was 5'8", 190 lbs and while that happens to be the perfect spec for a soldier, its damn near worthless in terms of athletics. I had no problems being an intramural warrior as 'I was going pro in something other than sports'. But when I went to college lax games I was amazed by the talent these players possessed and wondered 'why the hell are they hiding out in lax instead of playing baseball, basketball, tennis or hockey?'

At the time, its impossible not to notice the fact that most of the teams were white. There is nothing wrong with that fact, especially in light lacrosse's previous stated elite roots. But not all the teams my school competed against could have been considered elite, some in fact were quite middling (the schools academic perception, not the lax teams). Thus, I've just always had this nagging suspicion talented kids that play lax, along with water polo and rugby in this country was kind of a form of self-segregation.

I guess my specific lament is with regard to basketball as the demographics for whites in MLB and NFL are around 63%. But in the NBA, whites only make up 20% of the league. Now, in MLB the fact that blacks only make-up 8% of the league, down from an all time high of 17-19% is considered a major crisis. But the fact that the NBA has gone from about 40% white to 20% in about the same time frame is apparently not a cause for concern.

IMO, it's not a question of talent, as any of the guys I saw playing lax could have been the next Pistol Pete or Tom Chambers, but more of a question of willingness. That is what truly concerns me.

(this rambling diatribe has been brought to you by a black guy who is simply concerned for the game he loves)

Vandiver I think your suspicions are grounded in a new growing form of discrimination that has less to do with race and more to do with socioeconomic standing. The reality right now is that the middle class of America is under total assault by corporate America. Retirement accounts are being annuitized (may pay a nice monthly stipend to the retired, but your children will never inherit the principal as the banking institution absorbs it, or in the case of privatized non-profits the parent organization). Because of the tax breaks that big box stores lobby for and receive Mom & Pop start the day almost 15 points behind their bigger competitors just on taxes due. This doesn't even include buying in volume. Mom & Pop survived against the big chains until the tax advantages were granted. With the destruction of private business and the absorption of lifetime savings disguised as annuities coupled with the rise in ad valorum taxation to make up for the declining sales tax bases that corporate tax favors have created the middle class is slowly being sucked dry. Sociologically what does this have to do with lacrosse?

There is pressure on to move from the middle class to the corporate upper class. Parents will want their children to imitate the lifestyles of the super wealthy in hopes that their kids will find a way into it. It's the same reason all poor people spent every last dime trying to get their children educated so that they could make what was once the American dream....the middle class, preferably upper middle class.

That is also why I have frequently stated that football realignment is just a symptom of the economic consolidation taking place in the country and indeed the world. If you want something really frightening to chew on, because you and I can't contribute to politicians what corporations do, our protests over the present situation will not even be heard. These people work off of privilege not ability and they are extremely exclusionary. And some of them have already expressed a very scary thought that the new rich will be finding a way to have 2/3rds less population in the future thereby creating a more sustainable planet for their children.

Privilege and herd thinning has been an inspiration for every atrocity that those who have believed themselves to be superior have ever perpetrated upon society. Whether communistic zeal, nazi arrogance, religious fervor, or out right racism, the perpetrators have all had one thing in common, enough power to think themselves above reproach. Corporate America is there today. Watch out! And sadly these people come to power always under the guise of success and progress and when any remaining moral compass is gone and they feel the power the trouble starts.

In this country it started with the definition of white collar crime and special prisons in which to protect these sociopaths. We were once a democracy. In a democracy ideally criminals receive the same treatment regardless of class and citizens are afforded the same protections and have the same rights regardless of class. When the pretext for this is no longer even considered necessary you are no longer a democracy but at minimum a meritocracy and likely much worse.

I think lacrosse is rising in popularity only because it is a symbol of the rich and powerful to which a public, still largely unaware of what has already begun to transpire socially, hopes to have their children aspire.

Note: I don't hate lacrosse as a sport, but I despise the exclusiveness it has come to represent. And, I recoil every time someone on this board speaks glibly about how lacrosse attracts major donors and that is why it good to have the sport. That sentiment means that the exclusivity mentality is already in place.
(This post was last modified: 06-27-2013 03:51 PM by JRsec.)
06-27-2013 10:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
georgia_tech_swagger Offline
Res publica non dominetur
*

Posts: 51,420
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 2019
I Root For: GT, USCU, FU, WYO
Location: Upstate, SC

SkunkworksFolding@NCAAbbsNCAAbbs LUGCrappies
Post: #49
RE: SEC Lacrosse
The SEC should probably sponsor soccer first. I remember when I was attending chicken-land how bizarre it was to see C-USA logos on the field.
06-27-2013 11:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Gamecock Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,979
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 182
I Root For: South Carolina
Location:
Post: #50
RE: SEC Lacrosse
(06-27-2013 11:14 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  The SEC should probably sponsor soccer first. I remember when I was attending chicken-land how bizarre it was to see C-USA logos on the field.

It's strange to me too. South Carolina and Kentucky are the only SEC schools with soccer I think
06-29-2013 06:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
USAFMEDIC Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,914
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 189
I Root For: MIZZOU/FSU/USM
Location: Biloxi, MS
Post: #51
RE: SEC Lacrosse
All this being said, I think it is time we drop the social status and economics on the field of sports. Instead of banishing Lacrosse as a rich mans' game, lets make it a game for everyone. That starts with the universities spending a little money to make it available to everyone.04-cheers
06-30-2013 12:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DawgNBama Online
the Rush Limbaugh of CSNBBS
*

Posts: 8,375
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation: 456
I Root For: conservativism/MAGA
Location: US
Post: #52
RE: SEC Lacrosse
(06-01-2013 05:02 PM)PurpleReigns2012 Wrote:  I'm not even trolling, just stating facts. ACC schools have signed GoR and if they leave the ACC they won't get TV money for almost a decade. Not worth it for them to move, same with B12.

Sheesh, a decent thread about sport I haven't even heard that much about, and it gets derailed!! Now I see where the complaints are coming from!!! 03-hissyfit 03-banghead 04-chairshot


Getting back on topic, 07-coffee3 , I see Clemson and Virginia Tech also have teams. Hmm. Very interesting.

(06-30-2013 12:34 PM)USAFMEDIC Wrote:  All this being said, I think it is time we drop the social status and economics on the field of sports. Instead of banishing Lacrosse as a rich mans' game, lets make it a game for everyone. That starts with the universities spending a little money to make it available to everyone.04-cheers

I agree, and soccer needs to come on board as well, IMO. I used to play soccer, and I can tell you that is not an easy sport to play!!! It takes some real skill to play that sport, and it demands good physical conditioning. It's kinda like combining football with hockey, but on grass and with much less protective gear!!!
(This post was last modified: 06-30-2013 03:15 PM by DawgNBama.)
06-30-2013 03:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
USAFMEDIC Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,914
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 189
I Root For: MIZZOU/FSU/USM
Location: Biloxi, MS
Post: #53
RE: SEC Lacrosse
(06-30-2013 03:08 PM)DawgNBama Wrote:  
(06-01-2013 05:02 PM)PurpleReigns2012 Wrote:  I'm not even trolling, just stating facts. ACC schools have signed GoR and if they leave the ACC they won't get TV money for almost a decade. Not worth it for them to move, same with B12.

Sheesh, a decent thread about sport I haven't even heard that much about, and it gets derailed!! Now I see where the complaints are coming from!!! 03-hissyfit 03-banghead 04-chairshot


Getting back on topic, 07-coffee3 , I see Clemson and Virginia Tech also have teams. Hmm. Very interesting.

(06-30-2013 12:34 PM)USAFMEDIC Wrote:  All this being said, I think it is time we drop the social status and economics on the field of sports. Instead of banishing Lacrosse as a rich mans' game, lets make it a game for everyone. That starts with the universities spending a little money to make it available to everyone.04-cheers

I agree, and soccer needs to come on board as well, IMO. I used to play soccer, and I can tell you that is not an easy sport to play!!! It takes some real skill to play that sport, and it demands good physical conditioning. It's kinda like combining football with hockey, but on grass and with much less protective gear!!!
Yep. It was the only thing I was decent at in school. It takes a lot of work, and big lungs.
04-cheers
07-01-2013 01:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chargeradio Offline
Vamos Morados
*

Posts: 7,484
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation: 122
I Root For: ALA, KY, USA
Location: Louisville, KY
Post: #54
SEC Lacrosse
How many high schools play field hockey in the SEC footprint? That would allow for both men's and women's lacrosse, men's and women's soccer, and football to all exist in a Title IX-governed world. Essentially, every SEC school would offer the following:

Football (Men)
Indoor Volleyball (Women)
Field Hockey (Women)
Gymnastics (Women)
Rifle/Rowing/Equestrian (Women)
07-01-2013 10:40 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.