Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
UCF won the bowl appeal
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
the1sttransport Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 597
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 44
I Root For: Tolerance
Location:
Post: #21
RE: UCF won the bowl appeal
(04-21-2013 01:04 PM)HerdZoned Wrote:  
Quote:• Reduction of five initial (from 25 maximum) and five total (from 85 maximum) football scholarships for three academic years.

Try a reduction of 30 scholarships in a 5 year period. And down to 67 total scholarships (2005/2006). For what UCF got caught doing, you got a slap on the wrist.

Nah, no it's not
04-21-2013 04:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
st932253 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,899
Joined: Dec 2004
Reputation: 143
I Root For: Knights
Location: Orlando, Florida
Post: #22
RE: UCF won the bowl appeal
Here's a relevant fact: UCF run ruled Marshall today to win the series.
04-21-2013 05:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WinOrLoseEAGLE Offline
Banned

Posts: 820
Joined: Nov 2003
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #23
RE: UCF won the bowl appeal
(04-19-2013 11:14 PM)st932253 Wrote:  Rare thing to happen with the NCAA. Knights bowl eligible in 2013

WTF IS a "ucf"?
04-21-2013 06:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
KnightLight Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 27,664
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 700
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #24
RE: UCF won the bowl appeal
(04-21-2013 01:04 PM)HerdZoned Wrote:  
Quote:• Reduction of five initial (from 25 maximum) and five total (from 85 maximum) football scholarships for three academic years.

Try a reduction of 30 scholarships in a 5 year period. And down to 67 total scholarships (2005/2006). For what UCF got caught doing, you got a slap on the wrist.

No clue which NCAA Infraction Penalty you are talking about...but if you are talking about the NCAA's findings from 2001 that instituted the following penalties, then your above statement is wrong, WAY wrong:

3. The university will reduce the number of initial counters (scholarships) available in football by five in each of the 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 academic years. This limits the institution to 20 initial football counters during each of those three academic years under current legislation. [The committee noted that the institution has averaged 23 initial football counters during the past four years.]

4. The university shall further reduce the total number of football counters available under Bylaw 15.5.5.1 to 80 during each of the 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 academic years. [Note 1: The
institution self-imposed a limit of 83 counters in 2002-03 and 84 in 2003-04. The institution has averaged 84 football counters during the past four years.] [Note 2: The decision to reduce the institution's counters in football by a total of 15 over three years was based upon information submitted by the university in which it was documented that Marshall over awarded football grants by at least a total of 15 over the course of the 1997-98 through 1999-00 academic years.
This overage resulted from inclusion in the calculation of athletically related financial aid the wages paid to nonqualifers who worked for the athletics representative.]

5. The university shall reduce the number of total counters in men's basketball by one during both the 2002-03 and 2003-04 academic years, which will limit the institution to 12 counters each of those two years available under Bylaw 15.5.4.1. [Note 1: the institution has averaged 13 counters in men's basketball during the past four years. Note 2: The decision to reduce the institution's counters in men's basketball by a total of two over two years was based upon
information submitted by the university in which it was documented that Marshall over awarded men's basketball grants by at least a total of two over the course of the 1998-99 and 1999-00
academic years. This overage resulted from inclusion in the calculation of athletically related.

Complete NCAA Infraction Report for Marshall (and stated penalties)
http://media.herald-dispatch.com/adverti...report.pdf
(This post was last modified: 04-22-2013 08:44 AM by KnightLight.)
04-22-2013 08:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GCEagle Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 771
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 49
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: The Dirty Burg
Post: #25
RE: UCF won the bowl appeal
[Image: spidermandividebyzero.jpg]
04-22-2013 10:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gdunn Offline
Repping E-Gang Colors
*

Posts: 30,539
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2490
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: In The Moment

Survivor Champion
Post: #26
RE: UCF won the bowl appeal
(04-20-2013 08:10 AM)MU ATO Wrote:  Merica 12
SUMBITCH
[Image: merica-29.jpg?w=500]

03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao03-lmfao
04-22-2013 11:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.