RE: The Minor Sports & The Athletic Budget
But the Green golf center is less than 10 years old, no? Unless I'm in a time warp (which may be the case considering Brooks [see other thread]).
As to tennis, I'm not talking about earlier than 10 years ago. My retort was specifically in the past 10 years, which is what you wrote. You wrote "...and the community has chosen not to fund minor sports". I think the Green golf center and the *continued* support for tennis shows that, for those two sports at least, the community has *continued* to support those two minor sports. I'm not comfortable discussing particular donors, as most of those folks are friends of mine, and I really don't think this forum is a proper place to divulge personal contributions. (But since you already named some names, and you clearly have some knowledge, you'll also know that the couple you mentioned has had "other issues" to deal with, too.) And let me say that plenty of my friends and contacts still support tennis. Is there some bit of pushback? Well......yes, but it's spotty, and, truth be told, Yaser has had to look at things more from a business perspective than he used to. Too long a story and too complex to go into.
Green is different as all that was very public.
Now, if you want to consider futbol, softball, and baseball, we all know the very public "community" support, as General Shale, Thomas, etc., have in large part built the futbol and baseball fields (I just can't call them "stadia".) We also know that student funds have been a big part of those projects, too. But it's simply inaccurate to say that in the last 10 years that "...the community has chosen not to fund minor sports".
|