The unofficial online home for fans of the Old Dominion University Monarchs. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

Interesting to see where we rank. Remember that out football spending will increase with the added scholarships and other expenses related to FBS.

(03-08-2013 02:12 PM)RowdyRoost Wrote:  Just a fun little comparison (2011 numbers):

TOTAL ATHLETICS
1. UCONN - 63,828,624
2. USF - 43,574,401
3. SMU - 42,632,627
4. Cincinnati - 39,577,731
5. Temple - 38,937,885
6. UCF - 37,311,652
7. Old Dominion - 34,375,037
8. East Carolina - 32,404,673
9. Houston - 32,335,742
10. Memphis - 31,581,175
11. Tulsa - 31,128,157
12. Rice - 30,256,637
13. Tulane - 27,952,840
14. FIU - 27,428,277
15. UAB - 26,865,298
16. Western Kentucky - 25,770,262
17. Marshall - 24,020, 593
18. UTEP - 23,878,288
19. Middle Tennessee State - 23,155,761
20. North Texas - 20,402,052
21. Southern Miss - 19,770,938
22. UTSA - 19,679,379
23. FAU - 18,652,156
24. Louisiana Tech - 17,022,758
25. Arkansas State - 13,276,502

FOR REFERENCE
Texas - 129,234,974
Florida - 111,007,311
Michigan - 100,973,238
Alabama - 98,280,539
North Carolina - 78,271,704
UNLV - 52,529,971
San Diego State - 38,503,669
Boise State - 26,862,366


FOOTBALL BUDGET
1. Temple - 16,961,995
2. UCONN - 14,445,521
3. UCF - 13,636,867
4. SMU - 13,163,600
5. Memphis - 12,983,962
6. USF - 12,609,350
7. Cincinnati - 12,594,857
8. Rice - 11,144,518
9. Tulsa - 9,835,357
10. East Carolina - 9,211,773
11. Tulane - 8,993,439
12. Houston - 8,250,249
13. FIU - 7,867,972
14. Middle Tennessee State - 7,629,932
15. UTEP - 7,466,686
16. Southern Miss - 7,357,252
17. UAB - 7,337,254
18. Marshall - 7,133,258
19. FAU - 6,886,602
20. Louisiana Tech - 6,079,541
21. North Texas - 6,085,738
22. Old Dominion - 5,936,486
23. Western Kentucky - 5,883,389
24. UTSA - 5,140,135
25. Arkansas State - 4,341,626

FOR REFERENCE
Alabama - 36,918,963
Texas - 25,896,203
Michigan - 23,640,337
Florida - 23,045,846
North Carolina - 16,688,376
San Diego State - 11,748,674
Boise State - 8,537,612
UNLV - 6,947,976

Thanks for sharing this '78.

Interesting to see budgets. I wonder where revenues stack up. Tulane for instance must be in the red big time. Given their gate revenue....in that attendance is way down from years ago. Maybe their is more to the picture in that sponsors and donors do step up......as well as revenue is gained from TV and other BCS schools paying for Tulane to visit.

(03-10-2013 07:19 PM)gilla Wrote:  Thanks for sharing this '78.

Interesting to see budgets. I wonder where revenues stack up. Tulane for instance must be in the red big time. Given their gate revenue....in that attendance is way down from years ago. Maybe their is more to the picture in that sponsors and donors do step up......as well as revenue is gained from TV and other BCS schools paying for Tulane to visit.

School don't report deficits to the government database (or at least I've never seen one)

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/co...54955804/1

ADDITIONAL SITE FOR COMPARING........

APPRECIATE THE SHARE 78...

Our budget is heavily weighted with infratstructure payments (facilities) rather than operating costs. But that's OK. It shows we can generate the revenue to afford that level of expenses. The Ted will be paid off in 4 more years. That will help pay for Foreman Field upgrades. As other facilities get paid off, team operating budgets can increase.