(02-28-2013 11:06 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 10:14 AM)Smaug Wrote:  Why is the White House trying to strong arm Bob Woodward?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-b...2978.story

Nixon would be proud.

They aren't.

Either you're intentionally obtuse or stupid.

I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.

No you weren't. You even admitted your failure of comprehension two posts later. I specifically mentioned the House of Representatives and you said. " All of those representatives are up every two years?" Own it.

Repeat this line whenever you want to criticize others on their understanding of basic civics:

I'm stupid, I shouldn't judge others, and I have failed at basic comprehension of civics many times over.

(02-28-2013 11:11 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  No you weren't. You even admitted your failure of comprehension two posts later. I specifically mentioned the House of Representatives and you said. " All of those representatives are up every two years?" Own it.

Repeat this line whenever you want to criticize others on their understanding of basic civics:

I'm stupid, I shouldn't judge others, and I have failed at basic comprehension of civics many times over.

And I explained to you that I was referring to Congress in general. Really, if you don't think I know I vote for my house representative every two years, you're a f'n moron.

No you didn't.

Stop the insanity.

(02-28-2013 11:14 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  No you didn't.

Stop the insanity.

Stop the stupidity. You're displaying it.

(02-28-2013 11:09 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:06 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 10:14 AM)Smaug Wrote:  Why is the White House trying to strong arm Bob Woodward?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-b...2978.story

Nixon would be proud.

They aren't.

Either you're intentionally obtuse or stupid.

I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Sorry son, your timing sucks royally!

You lose. Good day sir!

Conservatives Regret Taking Woodward’s ‘Threat’ Story Seriously

(02-28-2013 11:14 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  No you didn't.

Stop the insanity.

Ok Mach are you really accusing rebs of not knowing the congressional election cycle (house and Seante) so you can try to look like you're winning an argument?

(02-28-2013 11:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:09 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:06 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 10:14 AM)Smaug Wrote:  Why is the White House trying to strong arm Bob Woodward?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-b...2978.story

Nixon would be proud.

They aren't.

Either you're intentionally obtuse or stupid.

I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Sorry son, your timing sucks royally!

You lose. Good day sir!

Conservatives Regret Taking Woodward’s ‘Threat’ Story Seriously

So, the words of the guy who was threatened don't carry so much weight, now?

When did lefties stop believing Bob Woodward? When he started tilting at your sacred windmill?

(02-28-2013 11:22 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:14 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  No you didn't.

Stop the insanity.

Ok Mach are you really accusing rebs of not knowing the congressional election cycle (house and Seante) so you can try to look like you're winning an argument?

He is accusing Rebel of not knowing because he didn't know. Mach is not just trying to look like he is winning, HE IS WINNING!

(02-28-2013 11:47 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:09 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:06 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 10:14 AM)Smaug Wrote:  Why is the White House trying to strong arm Bob Woodward?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-b...2978.story

Nixon would be proud.

They aren't.

Either you're intentionally obtuse or stupid.

I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Sorry son, your timing sucks royally!

You lose. Good day sir!

Conservatives Regret Taking Woodward’s ‘Threat’ Story Seriously

So, the words of the guy who was threatened don't carry so much weight, now?

When did lefties stop believing Bob Woodward? When he started tilting at your sacred windmill?

Read the e-mails....or continue to be damned fool. Your choice.

(02-28-2013 12:51 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:47 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:09 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:06 AM)RobertN Wrote:  They aren't.

Either you're intentionally obtuse or stupid.

I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Sorry son, your timing sucks royally!

You lose. Good day sir!

Conservatives Regret Taking Woodward’s ‘Threat’ Story Seriously

So, the words of the guy who was threatened don't carry so much weight, now?

When did lefties stop believing Bob Woodward? When he started tilting at your sacred windmill?

Read the e-mails....or continue to be damned fool. Your choice.

I read them. I guess my problem is that I read them the same way Woodward did. You know, the guy saying he was threatened?

Why can't you cons ever just admit you're wrong? It's really not that hard.

(02-28-2013 12:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Why can't you cons ever just admit you're wrong? It's really not that hard.

So, Brit Hume agreeing with you makes you right?

How many points do you concede on this board, Toms?

(02-28-2013 12:55 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 12:51 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:47 AM)Smaug Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 11:09 AM)Smaug Wrote:  Either you're intentionally obtuse or stupid.

I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.

Sorry son, your timing sucks royally!

You lose. Good day sir!

Conservatives Regret Taking Woodward’s ‘Threat’ Story Seriously

So, the words of the guy who was threatened don't carry so much weight, now?

When did lefties stop believing Bob Woodward? When he started tilting at your sacred windmill?

Read the e-mails....or continue to be damned fool. Your choice.

I read them. I guess my problem is that I read them the same way Woodward did. You know, the guy saying he was threatened?

Yes, you and he read them as people that are paranoid of the government.

(02-28-2013 01:01 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 12:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Why can't you cons ever just admit you're wrong? It's really not that hard.

So, Brit Hume agreeing with you makes you right?

How many points do you concede on this board, Toms?

And Erick Erickson?

And to answer your second question. About 1,000% more than you apparently.

(02-28-2013 12:19 PM)RobertN Wrote:  He is accusing Rebel of not knowing because he didn't know. Mach is not just trying to look like he is winning, HE IS WINNING!

I didn't know that I voted every 2 years for my congressman from the 10th district prior to this election, Paul Broun, or the 12th district the past election? I didn't know I was passing by all the Gdamn campaign signs? Are you a trying to be a retard? Or is it just your natural state of existence?

(02-28-2013 12:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Why can't you cons ever just admit you're wrong? It's really not that hard.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Seriously??? The guy who can't admit Obama has ever made a single mistake really just made that comment?

Wow, thanks for the laugh! Seriously, you are one funny guy!

(03-01-2013 05:29 AM)Razor Ramon Monarch Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 12:58 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Why can't you cons ever just admit you're wrong? It's really not that hard.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Seriously??? The guy who can't admit Obama has ever made a single mistake really just made that comment?

Wow, thanks for the laugh! Seriously, you are one funny guy!

Ask him about the Cowboy Church saga.

http://www.csnbbs.com/showthread.php?tid=609873

Do we need to change the name of this thread from whether Obama is out of his mind to which posters are?