(02-27-2013 12:25 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 12:20 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 12:16 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:44 AM)Smaug Wrote:  Well, that's a relief.

Not that it will matter very long since you guys want to destroy and/or eliminate the Post Office.

"You guys" again.

I'm beginning to think you might have Tourette's, Robs. Maybe you should look into it.

BTW, I don't want to destroy and/or the Post Office. It's own obsolescence is doing that pretty efficiently without my help.

The incompetence is just speeding it along.

I purposely put it in there just to piss you off. It seems to have worked.

You couldn't piss me off on your best day, Robs. You're simply not that important to me.

Rueful amusement would better characterize your impact on me, Robs. That's when I think about you at all.

(02-27-2013 12:24 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 12:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 12:16 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:44 AM)Smaug Wrote:  Well, that's a relief.

Not that it will matter very long since you guys want to destroy and/or eliminate the Post Office.

No, we want to make is self sufficient. Raise stamps to $.75 and eliminate Saturday delivery. Increase charge for fliers and mailers to reduce the amount of BS. End overnight delivery, leave that to FedEx and UPS that can do it without losing money.

Just a few ideas.

As I said. You want to destroy the Post Office because what you are suggesting would do exactly that.

More revenue, less workdays, reduced costs.... Yep the definition of destroy.

(02-27-2013 12:46 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 12:24 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 12:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 12:16 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:44 AM)Smaug Wrote:  Well, that's a relief.

Not that it will matter very long since you guys want to destroy and/or eliminate the Post Office.

No, we want to make is self sufficient. Raise stamps to $.75 and eliminate Saturday delivery. Increase charge for fliers and mailers to reduce the amount of BS. End overnight delivery, leave that to FedEx and UPS that can do it without losing money.

Just a few ideas.

As I said. You want to destroy the Post Office because what you are suggesting would do exactly that.

More revenue, less workdays, reduced costs.... Yep the definition of destroy.

He really should read 1984. He's already living it.

(02-27-2013 12:46 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 12:24 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 12:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 12:16 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(02-27-2013 11:44 AM)Smaug Wrote:  Well, that's a relief.

Not that it will matter very long since you guys want to destroy and/or eliminate the Post Office.

No, we want to make is self sufficient. Raise stamps to $.75 and eliminate Saturday delivery. Increase charge for fliers and mailers to reduce the amount of BS. End overnight delivery, leave that to FedEx and UPS that can do it without losing money.

Just a few ideas.

As I said. You want to destroy the Post Office because what you are suggesting would do exactly that.

More revenue, less workdays, reduced costs.... Yep the definition of destroy.

If I am reading this right, you are saying that .75 stamps would bring in more revenue. Fail. Stamp sales would drop dramatically because of decreased usage. THus increasing the need for more cuts in days and personnel. Essentially destroying the Post Office. But keep on listening to talking points and stay uninformed.

Robs, you're familiar with this internet thingy? It's all the rage.

That is as big a reason as any the Postal Service is going the way of the dodo.

Going back 140 years, I can probably hear you blaming mean ole conservatives about the demise of the Pony Express.

Why do you hate this country so much?

Mr. President, could you please provide me with a list of "Shovel Ready Projects?"

Mr. President, in light of your ongoing support of drone attacks and the Guantanamo Bay facility, among other things, will you be looking to return your Noble Peace Prize?

Mr. President, why do you not enroll your children in District of Columbia Public Schools system?

Mr President, we worry about kids and sex – so we have sex education in school. We educate kids about driver safety, drugs, healthy lifestyles and a host of other things that we have concerns about so kids learn safe practices to employ in their life.

So if Americans are so worried about kids and guns and what that future may hold, then why don’t we teach basic gun safety in schools?

Mr. President - why do you have such a compunction toward lying, and do you do it in your sleep?