(01-28-2013 05:47 PM)blazerwkr Wrote:  I don't put any value on Rivals or Scout as they're subscription based services. More subscribers mean higher stars plus more info on players & stars don't mean anything as I've seen 2 star recruits become first rd NFL draftees by the time they graduate & 5 stars become burger flippers.

This^ We have taken guys from bigger schools to only see their stars drop the next week. Just last week we had a player flip from MU to Cindy, and he increased a star like 2 days later. Stars are bullshi+.

Scout is way behind on Tech's recruiting. We have 16 commits, not 10.

(01-28-2013 11:52 AM)Cougar Paws Wrote:  http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9...=2&yr=2013





Of course UH has by far the top recruitng class in CUSA.

Those rankings don't really mean much to me. I'm glad UH appears to be doing well, but I've seen too many 4-star recruits end up being complete duds when they start playing college ball. There are also countless hidden gems that don't really start developing until they start getting the improved college coaching.

I didn't realize UH was to ever play another FB game in CUSA meaning none of those recruits are of any concern to me. Take it over to the BE board for comparison (and hurry before they change the conference name and you don't know what board to post on).