(01-12-2013 08:10 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-12-2013 04:22 PM)DawgNBama Wrote:  

(01-11-2013 08:38 PM)HerdZoned Wrote:  [quote='goherd17' pid='8823159' dateline='1357953368']
[quote='UofMemphis' pid='8822801' dateline='1357948489']We won't share a conference with MTSU...

why are u scared because they beat you in football complete bs. again its the my school is superior to your school and i will not lower myself to play you or be in a conf with you

They have always acted like that tawards Middle. It's not like they have the status of Tennessee or something. Reminds me of TCU and SMU
or how some TCU and SMU fans have treated UNT. But then again, I think the real reason UofMemphis doesn't want back in is because he knows that USM would own his Tigers in football once again. That's ok, I love you too UofMemphis.

Put another way: "Memphis won't be allowed to return to CUSA because MT is the future, and Memphis is like a good mullet with parachute pants: they were awesome in the 80s."

(01-12-2013 09:14 PM)TruBlu Wrote:  

(01-12-2013 08:10 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-12-2013 04:22 PM)DawgNBama Wrote:  

(01-11-2013 08:38 PM)HerdZoned Wrote:  [quote='goherd17' pid='8823159' dateline='1357953368']
[quote='UofMemphis' pid='8822801' dateline='1357948489']We won't share a conference with MTSU...

why are u scared because they beat you in football complete bs. again its the my school is superior to your school and i will not lower myself to play you or be in a conf with you

They have always acted like that tawards Middle. It's not like they have the status of Tennessee or something. Reminds me of TCU and SMU
or how some TCU and SMU fans have treated UNT. But then again, I think the real reason UofMemphis doesn't want back in is because he knows that USM would own his Tigers in football once again. That's ok, I love you too UofMemphis.

Put another way: "Memphis won't be allowed to return to CUSA because MT is the future, and Memphis is like a good mullet with parachute pants: they were awesome in the 80s."

That's cute coming from a NIT team...Can't wait to play UConn, Cincy, Temple, USF, UCF, etc...over playing MTSU, FIU, FAU, UTSA, UNT, etc.

(01-12-2013 09:14 PM)TruBlu Wrote:  

(01-12-2013 08:10 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(01-12-2013 04:22 PM)DawgNBama Wrote:  

(01-11-2013 08:38 PM)HerdZoned Wrote:  [quote='goherd17' pid='8823159' dateline='1357953368']
[quote='UofMemphis' pid='8822801' dateline='1357948489']We won't share a conference with MTSU...

why are u scared because they beat you in football complete bs. again its the my school is superior to your school and i will not lower myself to play you or be in a conf with you

They have always acted like that tawards Middle. It's not like they have the status of Tennessee or something. Reminds me of TCU and SMU
or how some TCU and SMU fans have treated UNT. But then again, I think the real reason UofMemphis doesn't want back in is because he knows that USM would own his Tigers in football once again. That's ok, I love you too UofMemphis.

Put another way: "Memphis won't be allowed to return to CUSA because MT is the future, and Memphis is like a good mullet with parachute pants: they were awesome in the 80s."

Wow, big talk right there.

It would be more likely that we would take the ex CUSA schools back and jettison the Sun Belt crowd should the nBE implode. That is still a possibility.

(01-13-2013 07:57 AM)TU 1978 Wrote:  It would be more likely that we would take the ex CUSA schools back and jettison the Sun Belt crowd should the nBE implode. That is still a possibility.

Anything can happen, but I'm reasonably confident that it won't come to anything close to that, but how would you get the water back on the other side of that dam once the flood gates have been opened?

UNT, MTSU, and La Tech aren't some start-up programs that are just now fielding football teams. They are very well established on the football landscape and I can't see any conference saying "oops, my mistake....sorry." The programs that will be new to FBS could potentially expect some hiccups in the process. I especially can't see Brit, who is a believer in an organized process in realignment, turning already invited programs away.

(01-11-2013 05:53 PM)MinerInWisconsin Wrote:  

(01-11-2013 05:41 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  I saw that on the realignment board... If that were to come about, you want to talk about a whole NEW set of dominoes? Cause I'd wager anybody wanting to move "after" that would be paying ZERO Exit/entrance fees with C-USA/BE.

Not saying it will happen but if this turns out to be true, UConn and Cincy to the MWC for FB would almost certainly bring Houston and SMU to the MWC too. That would leave the nBE with 7 for now, 8 when Navy joins, if they do. Wow.

Just bring UCF, USF, Temple and Memphis to C-USA for a nice round 18 and call it a day.

You will end up with two 18 team leagues. Throw in semi-final games and a championship game.

You can kiss the Big East goodbye.

(01-13-2013 05:15 PM)ATTALLABLAZE Wrote:  

(01-11-2013 05:53 PM)MinerInWisconsin Wrote:  

(01-11-2013 05:41 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  I saw that on the realignment board... If that were to come about, you want to talk about a whole NEW set of dominoes? Cause I'd wager anybody wanting to move "after" that would be paying ZERO Exit/entrance fees with C-USA/BE.

Not saying it will happen but if this turns out to be true, UConn and Cincy to the MWC for FB would almost certainly bring Houston and SMU to the MWC too. That would leave the nBE with 7 for now, 8 when Navy joins, if they do. Wow.

Just bring UCF, USF, Temple and Memphis to C-USA for a nice round 18 and call it a day.

You will end up with two 18 team leagues. Throw in semi-final games and a championship game.

You can kiss the Big East goodbye.

Again, if the NCAAs allow it.. we've been rejected for this proposal once before...