(12-09-2012 03:15 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  

(12-09-2012 01:54 PM)catdaddy_2402 Wrote:  Hard to get excited about a low payout bowl in a baseball stadium in a cold weather city, especially when we are losing our premier non-BCS bowl.

its a low pay bowl right now because its bigeast 4 vs big 12 7 if bigten and acc both put there 4th or 5th team in it the payout would double

Is this the same kind of assurance you cheerleaders were making about the Orange Bowl or is this a different kind of assurance you are pulling right square out your ass?

(12-09-2012 10:18 PM)stever20 Wrote:  blah blah blah blah blah blah

In the future do all of us on this board a favor and just post this:

Quote:Whatever would be best for the ACC I am posting the opposite

It would save your pathetic ass a lot of typing, and it would save us a lot of time skimming what we already know your broken record ass is going to say.

It should say a lot that I am not in any way a fan of the ACC and I find you repetitive and annoying.

(12-09-2012 10:04 PM)catdaddy_2402 Wrote:  

(12-09-2012 02:51 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  Don't worry CatDaddy...this bowl is for the northern flank teams...although if Clemson was invited I bet your wife would love to go to NYC at Christmas time.

Care to put money on it?

My wife was born in Green Bay, WI, and her family still lives there. We have been up there once after October the entire time we have been married. My wife wants nothing to do with snow and cold.

Her loss...NYC at the Holidays is awesome. Hope she enjoyed sitting in the warmth of FL last year watching WVU put 70 on her adopted team.

(12-09-2012 11:08 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  the orange bowl info was legit but deal got cheaper since bigten champ and sec champ were forbidden from appearing in the orange bowl because pac 12/big 12 didnt want to to play gang of 5 or couldnt get a guaranteed slot for themselves when sugar was hosting semi.

In other words the boasting that you and other cheerleaders did prior to the deal being announced was hot air. Kinda like y'all telling us that adding Syracuse and Pitt was going to get our TV payout right there with everybody else because y'all bring in huge tv markets.

Quote:The pinstripe has wanted the bigten since its inception and bigten couldnt make it work last time because of other bowl tie ins and the pinstripe is the yankees they always have the money

See above. I have learned my lesson about you Yankee folks. Y'all couldn't find your ass with two hands, a map, a flashlight, and three clues.

(12-09-2012 11:14 PM)catdaddy_2402 Wrote:  

(12-09-2012 11:08 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  the orange bowl info was legit but deal got cheaper since bigten champ and sec champ were forbidden from appearing in the orange bowl because pac 12/big 12 didnt want to to play gang of 5 or couldnt get a guaranteed slot for themselves when sugar was hosting semi.

In other words the boasting that you and other cheerleaders did prior to the deal being announced was hot air. Kinda like y'all telling us that adding Syracuse and Pitt was going to get our TV payout right there with everybody else because y'all bring in huge tv markets.

Quote:The pinstripe has wanted the bigten since its inception and bigten couldnt make it work last time because of other bowl tie ins and the pinstripe is the yankees they always have the money

See above. I have learned my lesson about you Yankee folks. Y'all couldn't find your ass with two hands, a map, a flashlight, and three clues.

You talk a lot of sh!t from your computer...Adding Pitt and Cuse did add money to the contract. The ACC didn't exactly have any leverage. You are the board's little chickenhawk badmouthing and boasting all over the place.

(12-09-2012 11:57 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  

(12-09-2012 11:14 PM)catdaddy_2402 Wrote:  

(12-09-2012 11:08 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  the orange bowl info was legit but deal got cheaper since bigten champ and sec champ were forbidden from appearing in the orange bowl because pac 12/big 12 didnt want to to play gang of 5 or couldnt get a guaranteed slot for themselves when sugar was hosting semi.

In other words the boasting that you and other cheerleaders did prior to the deal being announced was hot air. Kinda like y'all telling us that adding Syracuse and Pitt was going to get our TV payout right there with everybody else because y'all bring in huge tv markets.

Quote:The pinstripe has wanted the bigten since its inception and bigten couldnt make it work last time because of other bowl tie ins and the pinstripe is the yankees they always have the money

See above. I have learned my lesson about you Yankee folks. Y'all couldn't find your ass with two hands, a map, a flashlight, and three clues.

You talk a lot of **** from your computer...Adding Pitt and Cuse did add money to the contract. The ACC didn't exactly have any leverage. You are the board's little chickenhawk badmouthing and boasting all over the place.

Sure it did. It didn't add what you and the rest of y'all said it would add, however.

Just like you and the rest of the dumb*** Yankees claiming the Orange Bowl deal would match the Sugar/Rose deals.


Reckon y'all overestimated the value that Pitt and an almost Canada basketball school would bring to the ACC.

(12-09-2012 10:27 PM)catdaddy_2402 Wrote:  

(12-09-2012 10:18 PM)stever20 Wrote:  blah blah blah blah blah blah

In the future do all of us on this board a favor and just post this:

Quote:Whatever would be best for the ACC I am posting the opposite

It would save your pathetic ass a lot of typing, and it would save us a lot of time skimming what we already know your broken record ass is going to say.

It should say a lot that I am not in any way a fan of the ACC and I find you repetitive and annoying.

+1

He needs to stick to posting on the realignment board.

ooooooooooooooookkkkkkkkkkkk

Catdaddy

I agree and disagree with your points. Where I agree is, people that move from the north to the south would rather not come home for a few weeks in the winter. Going from 50/60/70 degree weather to 10/20/30 degree weather plus snow isn't fun at all. I know from experiance. So of course a Clemson, GT, or FSU fan wouldn't want to go to NYC for a Bowl game.

Here's where we differ, a BC/Pitt/Cuse vs PSU in a baseball stadium in NYC would generate tons of interest. Heck, how bout ND vs PSU in NYC. A game like BC vs Indiana wouldn't generate that same kind've interest tho. But we can't be counting on a PSU, Michigan, Nebraska, Wisky, or OSU to be in that game every year.

As for the OB, even I thought the OB would be on a much closer playing field as the Rose & Champions(Sugar). I was obviously wrong. Its very apparent that the ACC & OB needs far better negotiators when it comes to working on TV Deals.

1. The Pinstripe Bowl is an intriguing matchup for the northern schools in the ACC. There's nothing wrong with playing in NYC at the home of the most famous baseball club on the face of the Earth. It's within driving distance for our northern flank. It's probably also helpful that we aren't ******* who are scared of the cold.

2. I thought we'd get more on the Orange Bowl deal. It's sad that we couldn't get what the other conferences did and I thoroughly expected that we would.

3. Pitt and Syracuse need to get their football programs going. I think we're both on the right track at this point in time. Time will tell.

(12-10-2012 11:29 PM)ndlutz Wrote:  1. The Pinstripe Bowl is an intriguing matchup for the northern schools in the ACC. There's nothing wrong with playing in NYC at the home of the most famous baseball club on the face of the Earth. It's within driving distance for our northern flank. It's probably also helpful that we aren't ******* who are scared of the cold.

2. I thought we'd get more on the Orange Bowl deal. It's sad that we couldn't get what the other conferences did and I thoroughly expected that we would.

3. Pitt and Syracuse need to get their football programs going. I think we're both on the right track at this point in time. Time will tell.

Cuse is outselling WVU over 2 to 1 on ticket sales right now to the Pinstripe Bowl.

WVU hopes to sell/distribute their official allotment of 5000 tix and Cuse is close to selling out their official allotment of slightly over 10,000 tix. Note: The Big East has an allotment a tad over twice as large.

(12-09-2012 04:10 PM)catdaddy_2402 Wrote:  

(12-09-2012 03:15 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  

(12-09-2012 01:54 PM)catdaddy_2402 Wrote:  Hard to get excited about a low payout bowl in a baseball stadium in a cold weather city, especially when we are losing our premier non-BCS bowl.

its a low pay bowl right now because its bigeast 4 vs big 12 7 if bigten and acc both put there 4th or 5th team in it the payout would double

Is this the same kind of assurance you cheerleaders were making about the Orange Bowl or is this a different kind of assurance you are pulling right square out your ass?

ITS COMMON KNOWLEDGE PAYOUTS AND HIGHER BOWL SLOTS GO HAND IN HAND

(12-09-2012 11:14 PM)catdaddy_2402 Wrote:  

(12-09-2012 11:08 PM)Chris02M Wrote:  the orange bowl info was legit but deal got cheaper since bigten champ and sec champ were forbidden from appearing in the orange bowl because pac 12/big 12 didnt want to to play gang of 5 or couldnt get a guaranteed slot for themselves when sugar was hosting semi.

In other words the boasting that you and other cheerleaders did prior to the deal being announced was hot air. Kinda like y'all telling us that adding Syracuse and Pitt was going to get our TV payout right there with everybody else because y'all bring in huge tv markets.

Quote:The pinstripe has wanted the bigten since its inception and bigten couldnt make it work last time because of other bowl tie ins and the pinstripe is the yankees they always have the money

See above. I have learned my lesson about you Yankee folks. Y'all couldn't find your ass with two hands, a map, a flashlight, and three clues.

NO IF YOU HAD A CLUE AND ACTUALLY RESEARCH BEFORE OPENING YOUR TRAP YOU WOULD SEE THAT ORIGINALLY THE PINSTRIPE WANTED BIGEAST/BIGTEN MATCHUP BUT BIGTEN ALREADY HAD A FULL SLOT OF BOWLS SO THEY PASSED AND BIG 12 ACCEPTED