Navy replaces admiral leading Mideast strike group

The wrong guy is being blamed. obama needs to look in the mirror.

Haven't you learned, it's never his fault.. It's either the last administration or a Navy Admiral or General or The Republican controlled house or the Republican campaign politicizing of a situation.

When does he man the f*ck up and say, Yea I screwed the pooch on that one.

Less than Zero leadership from this Maxist Clown. Only place you find him in on the View or Letterman.

(10-27-2012 01:54 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Navy replaces admiral leading Mideast strike group

What does this have to do with Libya (read Benghazi)?

And please stick with facts please for a change, huh?

(10-30-2012 12:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2012 01:54 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Navy replaces admiral leading Mideast strike group

What does this have to do with Libya (read Benghazi)?
And please stick with facts please for a change, huh?

So, let's see...

We're going to take a bunch of actions that are questionable at best.
We're going to sit on the facts to hide them from you, at least until after the election.
And if you criticize our actions, we're going to attack you for not waiting for the facts to come out.
And you're totally okay with that.

(10-30-2012 12:43 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-30-2012 12:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2012 01:54 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Navy replaces admiral leading Mideast strike group

What does this have to do with Libya (read Benghazi)?
And please stick with facts please for a change, huh?

So, let's see...

We're going to take a bunch of actions that are questionable at best.
We're going to sit on the facts to hide them from you, at least until after the election.
And if you criticize our actions, we're going to attack you for not waiting for the facts to come out.
And you're totally okay with that.

Progs belief: Partisan ideology > Security and economic health of the nation.

(10-27-2012 01:54 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Navy replaces admiral leading Mideast strike group

Big O in big trouble.

(10-30-2012 12:43 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-30-2012 12:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2012 01:54 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Navy replaces admiral leading Mideast strike group

What does this have to do with Libya (read Benghazi)?
And please stick with facts please for a change, huh?

So, let's see...


We're going to take a bunch of actions that are questionable at best.
We're going to sit on the facts to hide them from you, at least until after the election.
And if you criticize our actions, we're going to attack you for not waiting for the facts to come out.
And you're totally okay with that.

I hope the Big O gets re-elected so we can impeach his azz...

The little professor always thinks he is the smartest guy in the room...

If the Dems keep the senate, an impeachment is a waste of time, no matter how richly deserved.

(10-30-2012 12:51 PM)No Bull Wrote:  The little professor always thinks he is the smartest guy in the room...

And that has never made a damn bit of sense to me. At what is this idiot smart in? As for professor, he was NEVER a professor. He was a guest lecturer and only on one amendment to the US Constitution, the 14th, something he had nothing to do with, nor did his Kenyan daddy. He didn't even come to the mainland till he was a f'n adult and his education, since grade school in Hawaii and throughout college, were ALL lily white schools. He wasn't slumming it in any HBCU like Alcorn or Paine. That was beneath him.

(10-30-2012 12:43 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(10-30-2012 12:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-27-2012 01:54 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Navy replaces admiral leading Mideast strike group

What does this have to do with Libya (read Benghazi)?
And please stick with facts please for a change, huh?

So, let's see...

We're going to take a bunch of actions that are questionable at best.
We're going to sit on the facts to hide them from you, at least until after the election.
And if you criticize our actions, we're going to attack you for not waiting for the facts to come out.
And you're totally okay with that.

Look dipshit. The dude posted a story saying this guy has been blamed for something that happened with Libya and was removed from his command for that reason with ZERO evidence.

Is that what you want from my side...posting bogus claims with zero evidence?

Your partisanship is showing...and it ain't pretty.

(10-30-2012 03:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Is that what you want from my side...posting bogus claims with zero evidence?

Nah. Two weeks was enough.

(10-30-2012 03:25 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(10-30-2012 03:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Is that what you want from my side...posting bogus claims with zero evidence?

Nah. Two weeks was enough.

Touche.

"So what did happen in Benghazi the night of Sept. 11 when Woods, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and two others were killed? The best way to establish the facts would be a detailed, unclassified timeline of events; officials say they are preparing one, and that it may be released later this week. That's a must, even in the volatile final week of the campaign. In the meantime, here's a summary of some of the basic issues that need to be clarified."

Even the libs are demanding an explanation....