Bull_In_Exile
Eternal Pessimist
Posts: 21,809
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 461
I Root For: The Underdog
Location:
|
RE: "Mentions of Richard Mourdock's rape comments by network
(10-25-2012 10:08 AM)DrTorch Wrote: (10-25-2012 09:20 AM)AtlanticLeague Wrote: must be nice to be a christian god, you have all the power with none of the accountability.
Accountability to whom? If you've got a problem w/ Him, feel free to confront him on it. You wouldn't be the first.
AL's just a troll... Let him go he has no interest in understanding the finer points of Christian Theology he just wants to bash it and get a rise out of people.
|
|
10-25-2012 10:20 AM |
|
DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
|
RE: "Mentions of Richard Mourdock's rape comments by network
(10-25-2012 10:20 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: (10-25-2012 10:08 AM)DrTorch Wrote: (10-25-2012 09:20 AM)AtlanticLeague Wrote: must be nice to be a christian god, you have all the power with none of the accountability.
Accountability to whom? If you've got a problem w/ Him, feel free to confront him on it. You wouldn't be the first.
AL's just a troll... Let him go he has no interest in understanding the finer points of Christian Theology he just wants to bash it and get a rise out of people.
True, but it's funny that he thinks he's clever with a retort that mirrors a foundational Biblical principle, spelled out in the origins documented in early Genesis...the book that is routinely criticized for being primitive.
The paradox here is amusing.
|
|
10-25-2012 10:41 AM |
|
UConn-SMU
often wrong, never in doubt
Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
|
RE: "Mentions of Richard Mourdock's rape comments by network
(10-25-2012 10:06 AM)RobertN Wrote: (10-25-2012 09:56 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote: (10-25-2012 09:53 AM)DrTorch Wrote: (10-24-2012 09:09 PM)Machiavelli Wrote: Saw this on my facebook so I thought I would share here. Truly disgusting what that nutjob said.
Mentions of Richard Mourdock's rape comments by network (as of 2PM): CNN (22), MSNBC (15), FOX (ZERO)."
Yep, fair and balanced reporting. SMDH. "We don't report, so you can't decide."
Why? This is hardly a big issue. And I can't decide b/c it's not my election. You really think the local media didn't cover it. Your complaint is moot. In fact it should be a criticism of CNN and MSNBC.
Agree completely. This is an Indiana issue. The leftist media wants to deparately make it a national/Romney issue. Fail.
THis is where you and Bull_in_crap are wrong. If he is elected it IS a national issue because he helps creating/passing this nations laws.
Who they send to Washington is up to the people of Indiana - not you or me. And the media's pathetic attempt to hang this guy around Romney's neck is pitiful. It won't work.
|
|
10-25-2012 11:05 AM |
|
uofmcamaro
Hall of Famer
Posts: 18,320
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 415
I Root For: Consistency
Location: Memphris
|
RE: "Mentions of Richard Mourdock's rape comments by network
So let me get this straight...you are getting your info from facebook?
|
|
10-25-2012 11:08 AM |
|
AtlanticLeague
All American
Posts: 3,783
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 110
I Root For: UMD / W&M
Location: DC
|
RE: "Mentions of Richard Mourdock's rape comments by network
(10-25-2012 11:08 AM)uofmcamaro Wrote: So let me get this straight...you are getting your info from facebook?
I thought that was supposed to be a good idea:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/23/state-dept-emails-from-day-libya-attack-show-al-qaeda-tied-group-on-radar/
|
|
10-25-2012 11:39 AM |
|